this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
248 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19940 readers
3854 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Top Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, are criticizing Trump’s new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, warning they will raise prices for American families.

Trump is imposing 25% tariffs on most Canadian and Mexican goods and 10% on Chinese imports, prompting retaliatory moves.

Democrats argue the tariffs unfairly hurt workers while benefiting corporations. Trump acknowledged potential economic pain but defended the move.

Meanwhile, Democratic senators introduced a bill to require congressional approval for tariffs, and even business groups allied with Trump are voicing concerns.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is true, ofc, but I honestly do not give a fuck what Democrats say. lol

[–] medicsofanarchy 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Warn, shit.

Get your shit together and do your fucking jobs and put an end to this.

Edit: A lot of comments pointing out the problems with Congressional powers vs. Presidential. All good points. However, (at least up until Musk changed the passwords) Congress can refuse to provide funding for stupid or harmful executive orders, including tariffs. And yes, to put that through, they'd need a majority. Unless it only works if they do it secretly, there ought to be a way to convince red-state corporations to bring some pressure to bear on their representatives and gather the necessary votes - at least for this bs.

[–] cabron_offsets 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They can’t do fuck all without 67 seats in the Senate. Our constitution is dumb af.

[–] dragontamer 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you want Democrats to do about this? Presidency has control of tariffs, always had.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Literally just show an ounce of retaliation.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 week ago

They might show some, and the Republicans show a little, but then still have a 50/50 tie broken by "JD" "Vance" even in ridiculous cases like Hegseth.

I mean, I want a party to fight for the American people, too, but....not sure what that would really accomplish?

[–] dragontamer -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whataboutism.

That has literally nothing to do with the tariffs here.

[–] hypna 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the idea here is that, as Republicans have repeatedly demonstrated, the minority party can do a lot to simply break the government.

If the Democrats had the intestinal fortitude to be real resistance against an authoritarian takeover, they could start filibustering everything, and using every procedural trick to delay or block every Republican action until some set of demands are met. Perhaps removing Musk from every government system, or reinstating all of the DoJ personnel who have been retaliated against.

Here we see Democrats basically unanimously going along with the Republican agenda so that they can feel like "the adults in the room," rather than fighting for the life of our republic.

[–] dragontamer -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And you still don't get it.

Republicans can do that because their argument is that government doesn't work. Democrats are the party of Government can work.

It's easy to torpedo and filibuster when you don't believe in the system.

[–] CharlesDarwin 5 points 1 week ago

Exactly. The qons have no problem at all pointing a gun at the head of everything Americans hold precious and forcing concessions from everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

In addition to the other comments pointing out that the presidency has (and has always had) control of tariffs, from the article:

Meanwhile, Democratic senators introduced a bill to require congressional approval for tariffs, and even business groups allied with Trump are voicing concerns.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

a majority of their colleagues have orange & shit-stained faces, who are all-in on on fucking-up the country for diaper's string-pullers and financiers.

congress isn't gonna stop or fix a fucking thing until the voters wake the fuck up and fill the capitol with a veto-proof opposition. a veto-proof majority is also conveniently enough for congress' role in amending the constitution, and for impeachments and convictions.

[–] dragontamer 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Congress never had control of tariffs.

[–] fan0m 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just because that’s how it’s always been doesn’t meet it should be immune from change.

[–] dragontamer -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who should control tariffs?

The House is Republican

The Senate is Republican.

The Courts are Republican

The President is Republican.

It's a sweep from the top down. Good luck. Next time win some politics before complaining. For now we just gotta sit tight and take it.

Even if Biden and Co passed laws to change who controls tariffs, the Republican sweep would have given them those levers of power anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a large enough majority would have the ultimate in 'control'

[–] dragontamer -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well let's start building that majority who can actually show up and vote. And maybe next time don't weaken your own candidates.

[–] Ensign_Crab -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And maybe next time don’t weaken your own candidates.

Maybe next time listen to someone to the left of Netanyahu.

[–] dragontamer 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No

Next time I remember that there is no one pure enough for you fuckers even when we are facing down Donald Trump.

Enjoy Trump deporting Free Palestine protesters dumbass.

[–] Rhoeri 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They had the audacity to say this:

I voted for your pro-genocide candidate

And then feel righteous in accusing others of “genocide support” for voting for Harris.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the part about feeling righteous, full stop. Even if we are standing neck deep in the overflowing swamp created by donvict and his thugs, with millions of people being victimized, they can still feel superior because they reluctantly voted for "your candidate" that is "pro-genocide".

Sigh. Well, at least they voted.

[–] Rhoeri 1 points 1 week ago

Good point. It’s just…. Man. Their entitlement-infused ignorance is so gods-damned annoying.

[–] Rhoeri -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly this. How do they think they have a platform to speak from when they have done nothing at all to stop trump from destroying America?

[–] CharlesDarwin 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What power do they actually have? Our stupid system over-represents a minority and so the Democrats have little power.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They had the same power the trump administration is currently abusing from early 2021 through early 2023.

They decided wielding it would be impolite.

[–] Rhoeri -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So then why bother with a warning? I totally agree with what you’re saying, I just don’t get what the fuck they think they are doing….

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I totally get the frustration, believe me.

[–] Rhoeri 0 points 1 week ago

So fucking frustrating.

[–] NatakuNox 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are a Canadian or Mexican please contact your representatives and have them do a more targeted tariff plan. Target American red states directly! Oil tariffs should be universal but anything made in red states and counties should have a 100% tariff. Force industry and goods to flow through blue areas and Trump's support will crumble.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As an American stuck in a red state, I support this. However I'm also concerned this could have the unintended side effect of trump forcefully taking over blue states and moving industry there. Or else destroying industry in blue states to force countries to buy from red states.

[–] NatakuNox 1 points 1 week ago

How? The US doesn't make anything the world wants or needs at a large enough scale to make moving industry within its boarders pointless. And even if they do move to a different state it's not like people suddenly turn red just because a factory opened up. With the standards of living being so much higher in blue states and a track record of positive change people won't give that up in exchange for being more like Mississippi.

[–] givesomefucks 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Top Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, are

Doing their best Captain Obvious impression....

While desperately hoping everyone forgets we had the same political capital four years and they did Jack shit to mitigate any damage a second trump presidency could do.

Moderates can't fight fascism, because they're going to say whatever is "in the middle" of basic human decency and fascism is the best path.

[–] toomanypancakes 6 points 1 week ago

Gotta compromise you know, doesn't matter what the opposition wants, the correct path is somewhere between that and what everyone in the country wants. I am very smart and politically savvy.

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 1 week ago

The qons love a regressive tax. At least the elitist ones do.

We'll see how much the average red hat likes it. But I'm sure they'll be distracted with lots of bullshit about immigrants, wokeness, DEI, etc...I suppose if the demons running the place break things hard enough, they might give the worst-hit, but most loyal, red hats an offer for a new job, with a nice uniform, to work for the government....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hey Democrats! Stop with the warnings and actually do something. Trump has made it clear that he doesn't fucking care. Giving him "warnings" is what led to this in the first place, you feckless dimwits.

[–] GeneralEmergency 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They can't do anything. Republicans have a majority.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

They won't do anything, that's how their ratchet effect works. Let Republicans do whatever they want while they do nothing to counteract it, thereby locking those changes in place. Democrats are complicit in everything Republicans do and are useless.

[–] not_that_guy05 4 points 1 week ago

Preach.

Choir.

[–] WrenFeathers 3 points 1 week ago

Wait… there are still democrats?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Like Democrats or Republicans give a shit about our pocket book. I have yet to see them do shit to help beyond minor things.
I will give credit for Illinois Democrats for passing a weeks PTO for everyone.