this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
158 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19609 readers
4704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump joked about running for a third term during a speech to House Republicans at a retreat in Florida, despite the two-term limit imposed by the 22nd Amendment.

His remarks drew laughter, but they come amid a proposal by Rep. Andy Ogles to amend the Constitution to allow Trump a third term, though the measure has not advanced.

Trump has made similar jokes before, calling it "fake news bait," while GOP lawmakers like Sen. Mike Lee dismissed the possibility due to constitutional barriers.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Trump has no sense of humor. His "jokes" are punching down or attention-seeking.

I just wish nature would take its course, since that seems the only way justice will be done.

[–] [email protected] 116 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If there's something everybody should have learned about Trump at this point is: if he says something, believe him.

This wasn't a joke. He's testing the waters. If whatever he throws doesn't stick, he says it's a joke. If it does, he runs again for a third term for real eventually.

Just like a randy guy who flirts with a woman in a bar and says "Can you imagine if you and I had sex in the bathroom right now?" and if the woman doesn't say yes outright, goes "Ah ha! Just a joke..." The truth is, he really wants to have sex.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is known as Schrodinger's Douchebag.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the guy's a douchebag whether you observe him or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, that wave function collapsed a couple generations ago.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to think about trump having sex in a bar!!! What are you doing, man???

[–] orclev 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to think about trump having sex in a bar!

That sentence could have ended three words sooner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or even five words sooner.

[–] Arbiter 3 points 2 days ago

Or seven words sooner

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not a joke.

Just as it wasn't a joke when he started talking about running the first time.

Thinking he was a joker or a joke is how we got here.

[–] Dragomus 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh it's definitely not a joke, repeat it enough and people can get used to the idea.

It's how his whole campaign is built, spout outlandish things that the opposition assumes is funny and does not take seriously enough to stop it early on.

In about 2 years the Trump camp will begin making statements like "we need extra time to finish the job" ... "what say you, another term to make america even greater?" ... "A 3rd term? We can make it happen for Americans" ... "The right man for the job!"

And by the time the next election season is supposed to begin he has been given his legal mandate to stay on indefinitely and is allowed to appoint a successor when he deems necessary...

[–] douglasg14b 8 points 2 days ago

I mean, there's already a congressman that has raised legislation to amend the constitution to allow for a 3rd term...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These "jokes" are so unbelievably inappropriate for someone in that position to be making. If this was a joke then he would apologise for making such an insanely inappropriate joke but it's not a joke. He knows it, we know it.

[–] theparadox 4 points 2 days ago

While it's not nothing to joke about such things Trump is, intentional or not, a grand master of generating outrage around less meaningful words and actions while work is performed in the background that should really be getting more attention.

It might be on purpose or it might be that he's just being deployed by those manipulating things in the background. He doesn't give a shit so long as he keeping growing his power, money, attention , and fame.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago

This is Caesar putting on a crown and seeing how the crowd reacts.

[–] xenomor 39 points 2 days ago

Just fucking kill him already.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago

"Hahaha, funny right? ...unless 👉👈"

Just gotta say it at least the once - I fucking called it.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 10 points 2 days ago

Is it still a joke if they're laughing at the American people that would likely roll over and accept him running for a 3rd term (like they accepted an insurrectionist running)?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't believe the US' first dictator will be this diapered decrepit senile old scammer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the second will be JD Vance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Honestly probably better than it becoming a hereditary position and us ending up with Cokie Monster as emperor in chief.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Constitutional barriers failed once. No troglodyte-operated state GOP would even blink at ignoring further violations to put him on the ballot again and because there's no functional system to stop them once it's started, there really aren't any barriers except the limits of the human lifespan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

That's pretty much what I keep thinking. The law hasn't caught up to Trump yet and likely never will. If the rest of the GOP were watching and paying attention to other dictators, they've learned a new phrase to justify breaking all the rules: who's gonna stop us?

[–] curiouschipmunk 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Except that if they pull this off, guess who also will be able to run? Obama.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The wording is such to explicitly block Obama.

Because they all know that Obama would easily kick Trump's ass at the polls, no matter how they rig it.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 2 days ago

no matter how they rig it.

I'm sure they'd be up for the challenge. I mean, these are the Republicans we are talking about.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Nope, they worded it to exclude anyone who was president twice in a row. The only upshot is that we might die from whiplash looking at all these current events.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

If they pull this off what makes you think there will be a democracy for Obama to compete in?

[–] Chainweasel 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The wording of the bill specifically bans Obama.
According to the bill you can have more than two terms as long as your first two terms weren't consecutive.
So, you can be president forever as long as there's a gap between your first and second terms, Obama served his first and second terms consecutively so he's disqualified from having any more terms. Same with Bush and Clinton.

[–] dhork 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That bill has zero chance of becoming an amendment in the normal process. It needs a 2/3 majority in each House, plus 3/4 of the states to sign on. So the text of the bill will never, ever be relevant.

What has been happening instead is that Trump just ignores the law and Constitution when it suits him, and makes up some bullshit legal excuse, knowing that if it makes it up the SCOUTS he has stacked the deck there.

At least the two most recent rulings (immunity and insurrection) had some legal nuance that justified attention from the SCOTUS, though. Any attempt by Trump to run again, without a Constitutional amendment allowing it, should be laughed out of court. But pay close attention to forthcoming rulings on birthright citizenship. That position is equally absurd, as Trump is relying on legal theories which pre-date the 14th Amendment, so they should no longer be valid. That is bound to end up at SCOTUS soon, and if they rule against Trump (or, more likely, let lower court rulings that it is batshit crazy stand), then there is some hope that SCOTUS will rein him when he tries to run again....

I hope the Supreme Court funds its own personal security, though. If they do go against Trump on the citizenship stuff, Trump's army of pardoned insurrectionists might stage another "peaceful protest", and might determine the solution is to forcefully open up a few new seats....

[–] Ensign_Crab 8 points 2 days ago

So democrats will be running against him a fourth time, constitution be damned.

Calling it now, they're going to move even further to the right on the grounds that the alternative is trump so they can get away with it.

Again.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 2 days ago

What a kneeslapper.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 2 days ago

This feels like it's mostly up to the people in the military who are the ones actually holding the guns.

If he doesn't want it to get to that level, he doesn't have to take it there. No one's making him.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dude thinks he's putin. This isn't Russia, we have different laws on how this won't work. Dude is 78. He will be 82 at the end of this term, he would be 86 at the end of a 3rd term. The Earth will swallow him up first.

[–] grue 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This isn’t Russia, we have different laws on how this won’t work.

Really? Please explain how all our "different laws" have succeeded in stopping him up to this point.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Changing the Constitution requires a majority of Congress and the States. He can't just write a memo.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There is no way an amendment to the constitution on this would ever happen. Thebatr is very high to clear.

[–] grue 16 points 2 days ago

The Emoluments Clause is in the Constitution.

The 14th Amendment ban on insurrectionists holding office is in the Constitution.

How many more examples do you need before you understand what has happened?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Didn't we all think there was no way a convicted felon would become president too?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So they just do it without an amendment. Who's gonna stop them? The SCOTUS which has declared that Trump isn't bound by law while president? The people, who happily voted Trump into power after he tried to overthrow the previous government? Congress? The military?

Maybe one of them will, but I would be very anxious these days if I lived in the US.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

There is a whole government beurocracy that needs to be put in motion to have an election. Including election boards that are controlled by state governments. So all they basically have to do is the blue states just say no we are not having an election and then it doesn't happen.