this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
396 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19519 readers
3573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring only two sexes, male and female, based on reproductive cells at conception, banning gender-affirming care, and limiting federal recognition of gender diversity.

Experts, including Dr. Richard Bribiescas, president of the Human Biology Association, criticized the policy as nonsensical, stating, “Clearly, this order is not fully informed by current biological science.”

Biologists noted the order oversimplifies human biology, ignores intersex individuals, and conflates sex and gender.

Critics warned it advances anti-trans rhetoric and risks legal challenges.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago

I thought he declared one sex?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Trump's new sex definitions are impossible for anyone to meet. Everyone is legally nonbinary now. https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/trump-says-americans-are-all-intersex-not-female-b31f97ffd80d

[–] frog_brawler 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine; all of this to prevent trans folks from using the women’s restroom… but now we can all use the women’s restroom by way of Executive Order. What a time to be alive!

[–] elrik 9 points 16 hours ago

I'm pretty sure now we all MUST use the women's restroom as we're all legally female.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

So they just denied the Judeo-Christian yhwh, because that being is androgyne.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ah, yes.

Trump will surely change his mind after reading their sternly written letter, because as we all know, Trump truly cares about science.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

And he can't read, at least not big words with more than 2 syllables.

[–] atx_aquarian 25 points 23 hours ago

Changing his mind isn't the goal. He constantly already does that for the highest bidder. The people who have to enforce this stuff and the courts that have to rule on it are the ones who need to be well aware of its nonsense, and the bigger of a mess that causes, the better.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

He totally reads written reports too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

As usual President Felon is talking out his ass, doing nothing for Americans, and being led by the nose by christian fascists. Someone please get that man 25 buckets of KFC. Cardiac event in 3-2...

[–] lunarul 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

conflates sex and gender

I read the order. It explicitly avoids defining gender and says that only sex should be used everywhere (which it does define, but incorrectly).

It basically says that the government doesn't care about your gender, they just want to know what's in your pants (or used to be).

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they just want to know what’s in your pants (or used to be).

At the moment of conception....

Of course that's the real poison pill of this. The real intention is to declare personhood at conception... and pave the way for the nation wide abortion ban. Making things worse for trans people, is just the decoy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If they declare personhood at conception some pregnant women should demand to be allowed to purchase a life insurance policy, and immediately sue when denied.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

The levels of chaos that can come from this are off the charts... Yeah someone can purchase life insurance on an unborn child... at the same time every miscarriage is on the board for manslaughter/homicide, basically leading mothers to prove that the miscariages were not intended or negligent. The ramifications and definitions of things are outright terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

At the moment of conception...

Doesn’t everyone start out female and then become male or stay female?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Conception is literally the point when the sperm fertilizes the egg:

Conception (or fertilization) is when sperm and an egg join together.

reference

At that point it's not anything, it's just a fertilized egg. Assigning a sex to it makes no sense at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

So everyone should be no sex then?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago

At conception, yes, there is no sexual differentiation. In humans the SRY protein is responsible for a fetus developing male sexual characteristics. The effects of this gene are expressed after week 6 of development:

SRY gene effects normally take place 6–8 weeks after fetus formation which inhibits the female anatomical structural growth in males. It also works towards developing the secondary sexual characteristics of males.

That is, at least a month and a half after conception.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Doesn't it have a complete set of sex chromosomes at that point?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

As far as I an aware, yes. But the degree did not mention chromosomes, but rather

the sex that produces the large reproductive cell And the sex that produces the small reproductive cell

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago

Executive order ‘ripped’, or maybe ‘blasted’ or whatever the latest word for ‘we made some tiny lil vid or headline saying maybe it wasn’t the best.’ I’m so sick of it. Sick of the way media portrays things. That’s it, the media has been SLAMMED by me, ripped, blasted, smoked! Whatever bullshit that basically means ‘we disagree, but have no teeth’ bleh

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

If you want to see how history is going to play out on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_10450

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about intersex people?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Everyone who does not fit into their categories, and everyone who cares about people who don't fit into their categories, needs to understand that you don't and can't fight Nazis by proving them wrong in an argument. You have to fight Nazis by fighting them. Also understand that you will be on their list of targeted "misfits" soon enough, so fight in solidarity with everyone who already is.

[–] Bytemeister 16 points 23 hours ago

Cured. Thank you Mrs. Trump for clearing that up so easily.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's such a fucking stupid argument everyone is a human just get rid of male and female and sex all together.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get rid of sex altogether? I'm already ahead of the curve

[–] ZILtoid1991 1 points 17 hours ago

I am hypersexual, and I need sex.

[–] this_1_is_mine -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck you! I am a helicopter.

[–] NocturnalMorning 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How..uh..how does a helicopter type stuff on the internet?

[–] this_1_is_mine 3 points 1 day ago

One doesn't need fingers to send text.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'll have to complete in sports regardless, no more weight classes, no woman league, no special handicaps for helicopters. Your either good enough to compete or not. Also shame on you for what your people did to Kobe.

[–] this_1_is_mine -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fair. Get on my level. Eat shit. I'm ....... a helicopter. Get hellfired. Peace.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah you're a Robinson R-22

[–] sumguyonline -5 points 22 hours ago

It is possible to give someone a concussion with only words. The key is, saying something so ghastly against what they believe and backing it up with as much fact as possible they literally concuss themselves with the fight they produce in their own mind against the encroaching reality they simply don't want to believe exists. That girl that's being mean to you when you haven't even talked to her. Tell her when she turns 30 the only men interested in her will be college guys that want to run a train. At 40 she'll need a friend to come along or they won't join. This crushes her self image of an "alpha sexual being" and forces the reality she is actually an aging mortal with a ticking clock on her ovaries. You should play with your own variation because if everyone says what I said, it loses potency. Kinda how calling them future cat ladies doesn't bite as much as it did in the 80's because everyone did it. Or calling everyone a Nazi loses potency when you do it all the time. Think along the lines of actually plausible. "When you turn 40 you better have a good education you'll need it to pay for sex", or, "you're so stupid you're definitely walking in a snow storm for groceries for you and your senior cat when you're no longer pretty enough to get guys to do it for you." Give them a chance to process, and don't even try to talk to them after, let them retreat to their friends and adapt to their new existence. They might do baby talk. Its hilarious. I hope someone verbally concusses trump. He has earned it. Idk with his age and past covid exposure if he would be fit to do more than drool... Probably work if someone had hunter biden level evidence against one of trumps kids. Messes up his dynasty.