this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
458 points (98.3% liked)

196

16845 readers
3576 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To anyone curious: It's barely bad enough to even be funny. It's not a great porn flick. Pretty basic Ron Jeremy, piss poor parody that's only really interesting because of Nintendo's actions. There's also a sequel.

There's also a fuckton of porn we'll never see. Supposedly there's stacks of Disney stuff bored animators have drawn, things for Bethesda titles that never left the office... It's wild, when you start running down the rabbit hole.

[–] lemmyman 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bethesda

Perhaps an animated edition of the Lusty Argonian Maid?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

i was hoping for sarah morgan but that'll be good too

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not to mention two millennia of porn allegedly in the Vatican Archives.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool 1 points 8 hours ago

Can you imagine all the stolen loot in that place? Treasures that some nations probably think are lost forever are sitting in the vault of the people who robbed them

[–] jaybone 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The other tablets Moses received.

[–] MeaanBeaan 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the Lord said unto the as he slid the tablet slyly to Moses "This one, this one's for you wink wink"

[–] ivanafterall 9 points 1 day ago

"About that whole 'thy neighbor's ass' bit, you've gotta see this..."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That reminds me of that My Life as a Teenage Robot "parody."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can't just say that and not elaborate. Btw, she's underaged

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’d enjoy seeing a real ideological debate on the ethicality of sexualizing a cartoon teenage robot between intelligent and informed parties and whether or not said robot can even be considered “underaged”. I’m not taking a stance, I just want to watch other people do so

[–] HollowNaught 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, at the root of it all, you've got to ask why paedophilia is wrong in the first place

Is it the individual's obsession with youth-like appearances or naivety? Not necessarily, as both of those things can fairly easily be emulated in older (legal) individuals

I'd argue it's wrong simply because of the impact you're having on the victim. You are effectively giving them ptsd for the rest of their life, destroying any childhood they may have left, even if consensual, as they can hardly be expected to understand what they're agreeing to

But a robot? Well, I don't know if this line of thought can even apply to them. On one hand, we don't know her actual age (I think); she may be entirely legal

On the other, if she can fully emulate a younger teen mind, then how is raping her any different from raping a human?

Can you even consider them equivalent, when you can wipe her entire memory?

Can you even quantify her age?

Questions for later

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’d like to hope everyone agrees it's wrong. She had "the mind of a teenager" but I think she hadn’t had sentience that long. Maybe someday they’ll make robots take a test to see if they’re ready.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What about sexting an AI that was trained last year? Would it be different if it was considered sentient or not?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I think so. You can use tools however you want.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ready? Ready for what? To be fucked?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I was leaning toward consent but sure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The title of the show literally states that she’s a teenager and people will go “would”

[–] Duamerthrax 11 points 1 day ago

The title also states she's a robot and people will go “would”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

technically, 18 and 19 are teen ages thats why there is a teen section in porn