this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
802 points (99.6% liked)

Bluesky

201 readers
364 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 312 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So.... unstable government with increasing internet censorship.

[–] Soup 100 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Right? Like “turns out it’s just…” implies that the U.S. isn’t 50 states in a trench coat where the federal government changing hands means there isn’t the constant major changing of policy every few years from center-right fence-sitters to chaotic-evil fascists and back again.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

and back again

Except, this time, it can last decades.

Remember the 40 years of Progressive Democrats (like the FDR era) dominating politics? This could be like that, but reversed.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

The Regressive Era

[–] untorquer 6 points 3 days ago

Has been since Reagan.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well the trench coat...I was about to say a fairly recent addition but some states are younger than that. There was a time when we said "The United States are..." rather than 'The United States is..."

We are, after all, the world's oldest surviving Federation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Back again? No. Center-right fence sitters do not move the status quo. They preserve it wherever it lands.

[–] Soup 4 points 3 days ago

I mean fair but there are some positives, at least. Even the bad democrats will do, or at least not outright kill, some good stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Nothing like a little blue balls to kick start another civil war.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 128 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is essentially internet censorship.

[–] brlemworld 99 points 4 days ago

It is ~~essentially~~ internet censorship.

[–] Snapz 41 points 3 days ago

Now go find which members of Congress bought a bunch of VPN stock before these bans went into effect.

[–] Duamerthrax 36 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Emerald 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oooh you've been caught with a secret link! I went to select those emojis and YouTube opened lol

[–] Kbobabob 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Only a secret for some I guess.

[–] Cliff 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Which client/webinterface is this? Asking for a friend...

[–] Kbobabob 3 points 3 days ago

Sync for Lemmy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/-9R-2X9Bl5w

Keep Your Parents Off the Internet. Aged very well...

"The Internet is an outstanding pornography delivery vehicle."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

An error occurred. Please try again later. (Playback ID: x9uBXw9Cu8LEmnOJ)

Not sure why but I can't play this one for some reason.

Also, parents back then: "Don't believe everything that's on the internetz!" Parents now: "Did you know that 'insert wild conspiracy bullshit'?!"

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It just makes me think that neocons will come after vpns soon.

[–] SmoothLiquidation 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So many businesses use vpns in their day to day operations. There would be a huge push back from companies with money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They'd just carve out an exception for corporations but ban private use.

[–] SmoothLiquidation 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you vpn in to work from home, from you isp’s pov it looks the same as if you used a “private” vpn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not if your company has to register the IP address range of the VPN connections they use. ISPs could whitelist registered IP address ranges and block all other known VPN addresses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They can try, we see how compliant the US was during Covid. Imagine that, but now the resistance is on both sides. VPN bans is gonna cause riots.

[–] pivot_root 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

With the FCC unable to enforce net neutrality, they don't even have to ban VPNs. Just hide some legislation inside an unrelated bill to give $250M to internet providers on the condition that they throttle VPN connections to 100 Kbps*, which those greedy fucks will happily accept.

*Likely worded as a stipend to improve the infrastructure, but only as long as the infrastructure is not used to aid terrorism™.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago
[–] disguy_ovahea 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Same thing happened when Abbott started this whole thing in March of 2024

Texas VPN

[–] SirSamuel 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if they saw a surge when Disney raised their price twice in a year, or Prime started showing ads.

I know my ISP saw a spike in traffic from Switzerland to my house around the same time.

Weird.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper 3 points 3 days ago

For me it's the amount of traffic between my seedbox in the Netherlands and my home

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Nice cover story for people living in fear of Musk's Presidency

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

...doesn't proton claim they don't analyse user data?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To do this graph you don’t have to have any user specific data. Just total amount of new accounts every day per country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, but the "it's just porn, lol ¯\_(ツ)_/¯" conclusion?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

Most likely conclusion due to porn sites having to restrict access from some conservative US states.

[–] FlexibleToast 24 points 4 days ago

You can find that from the news. The recent change is that many of the big sites are blocking the southern states because they have enacted laws that would require getting IDs to verify age. The sites don't want to handle that PII.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne 8 points 3 days ago

They had a really good signup deal a few months ago: $75 for two years of service.

Love it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Sign ups to VPNS that Hide You Online ACKTUALLY ONLY happen in the Freest Places in the World!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

... seems like both tbh.

[–] Sam_Bass 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah porn isn't the most censored internet thing is it

load more comments
view more: next ›