this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
811 points (99.6% liked)

Bluesky

423 readers
18 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 318 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So.... unstable government with increasing internet censorship.

[–] Soup 105 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Right? Like “turns out it’s just…” implies that the U.S. isn’t 50 states in a trench coat where the federal government changing hands means there isn’t the constant major changing of policy every few years from center-right fence-sitters to chaotic-evil fascists and back again.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

and back again

Except, this time, it can last decades.

Remember the 40 years of Progressive Democrats (like the FDR era) dominating politics? This could be like that, but reversed.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

The Regressive Era

[–] untorquer 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Back again? No. Center-right fence sitters do not move the status quo. They preserve it wherever it lands.

[–] Soup 4 points 1 month ago

I mean fair but there are some positives, at least. Even the bad democrats will do, or at least not outright kill, some good stuff.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well the trench coat...I was about to say a fairly recent addition but some states are younger than that. There was a time when we said "The United States are..." rather than 'The United States is..."

We are, after all, the world's oldest surviving Federation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Nothing like a little blue balls to kick start another civil war.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 130 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is essentially internet censorship.

[–] brlemworld 99 points 1 month ago

It is ~~essentially~~ internet censorship.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Emerald 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oooh you've been caught with a secret link! I went to select those emojis and YouTube opened lol

[–] Kbobabob 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Only a secret for some I guess.

[–] Cliff 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Which client/webinterface is this? Asking for a friend...

[–] Kbobabob 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/-9R-2X9Bl5w

Keep Your Parents Off the Internet. Aged very well...

"The Internet is an outstanding pornography delivery vehicle."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

An error occurred. Please try again later. (Playback ID: x9uBXw9Cu8LEmnOJ)

Not sure why but I can't play this one for some reason.

Also, parents back then: "Don't believe everything that's on the internetz!" Parents now: "Did you know that 'insert wild conspiracy bullshit'?!"

[–] Snapz 41 points 1 month ago

Now go find which members of Congress bought a bunch of VPN stock before these bans went into effect.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It just makes me think that neocons will come after vpns soon.

[–] SmoothLiquidation 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So many businesses use vpns in their day to day operations. There would be a huge push back from companies with money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They'd just carve out an exception for corporations but ban private use.

[–] SmoothLiquidation 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you vpn in to work from home, from you isp’s pov it looks the same as if you used a “private” vpn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not if your company has to register the IP address range of the VPN connections they use. ISPs could whitelist registered IP address ranges and block all other known VPN addresses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They can try, we see how compliant the US was during Covid. Imagine that, but now the resistance is on both sides. VPN bans is gonna cause riots.

[–] pivot_root 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With the FCC unable to enforce net neutrality, they don't even have to ban VPNs. Just hide some legislation inside an unrelated bill to give $250M to internet providers on the condition that they throttle VPN connections to 100 Kbps*, which those greedy fucks will happily accept.

*Likely worded as a stipend to improve the infrastructure, but only as long as the infrastructure is not used to aid terrorism™.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] Duamerthrax 36 points 1 month ago
[–] disguy_ovahea 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Same thing happened when Abbott started this whole thing in March of 2024

Texas VPN

[–] SirSamuel 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if they saw a surge when Disney raised their price twice in a year, or Prime started showing ads.

I know my ISP saw a spike in traffic from Switzerland to my house around the same time.

Weird.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper 3 points 1 month ago

For me it's the amount of traffic between my seedbox in the Netherlands and my home

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Nice cover story for people living in fear of Musk's Presidency

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...doesn't proton claim they don't analyse user data?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To do this graph you don’t have to have any user specific data. Just total amount of new accounts every day per country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, but the "it's just porn, lol ¯\_(ツ)_/¯" conclusion?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Most likely conclusion due to porn sites having to restrict access from some conservative US states.

[–] FlexibleToast 24 points 1 month ago

You can find that from the news. The recent change is that many of the big sites are blocking the southern states because they have enacted laws that would require getting IDs to verify age. The sites don't want to handle that PII.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

... seems like both tbh.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Sign ups to VPNS that Hide You Online ACKTUALLY ONLY happen in the Freest Places in the World!

[–] FlashMobOfOne 8 points 1 month ago

They had a really good signup deal a few months ago: $75 for two years of service.

Love it.

[–] Sam_Bass 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah porn isn't the most censored internet thing is it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"It's just porn"? What does that mean? Are people sending porn over email or something?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Signups for ProtonVPN

Republican states have banned or blocked porn sites. People are using VPNs to bypass.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Oooh, I misread. Thanks.

[–] Cort 27 points 1 month ago

Many US States have new laws that require porn sites to verify age and most porn sites don't want to make themselves a target for Cyber attacks (searching for identity documents) so they deny access to any IP address in the state with that law.

The vpn is just to Make it look like you're in a state that doesn't have these censorship laws

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Are people sending porn over email or something?

I like to fax dick pics to land lines that decide to attach a fax machine to them.

Fax is like uhhhhh e-mail for rotary phones.

load more comments
view more: next ›