this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
550 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19283 readers
1910 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The House GOP's new rules package aims to weaken minority party influence while advancing a pro-corporate agenda.

Key provisions include shielding the House speaker from bipartisan accountability and fast-tracking 12 GOP bills without allowing amendments, including measures to sanction the International Criminal Court (ICC) and protect fracking.

Democrats, led by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), criticized the package for ignoring economic and social issues like inflation and housing while prioritizing tax cuts for billionaires.

Republicans plan to offset these costs by slashing social programs, sparking warnings of further congressional dysfunction.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leadore 9 points 16 hours ago

They did vote for it and they are going to get what they voted for, good and hard.

[–] Jimmycakes 7 points 18 hours ago

They actually did vote for this with open eyes

[–] AnthropomorphicCat 9 points 19 hours ago

You guys are so fucked lmao

[–] hark 4 points 16 hours ago

The responses here reaffirm to me how sweet this setup is for the rich. You've got two parties owned by the rich, with one willing to give a few minor concessions to the peasants, and the masses are stuck between them, but you better vote for the somewhat less bad party or else it's all your fucking fault that everything is bad. Seriously, is the strategy to demand the majority vote for a single party until the end of time? You've got to see how that's impossible under this system. It's a way to shift the blame off the broken system and to make it an issue of individual responsibility. Reminds me of people who bash the poor as lazy people who just need to "get a job".

[–] WrenFeathers 5 points 17 hours ago

They did with absolute certainty.

[–] inclementimmigrant 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They absolutely did vote for this and sat on their asses and also didn't vote and voted for this.

Fuck you Americans, you wanted it, now we all get your shitty choices.

[–] FunnyUsername 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey man i didn't vote for the assholes

[–] inclementimmigrant 9 points 1 day ago

Too damn bad that's not how democracy works. You'll take what the idiots give us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

Sadly, because of the US's imperial nature, it's not just going to affect them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Most Americans did vote for this. Now enjoy what you sow.

[–] iAvicenna 23 points 1 day ago

yes. yes, they did.

[–] Bibbiliop 108 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But they did vote for this. Whenever I saw Trump speak, he always emphasized on how he will do tax breaks to the big corps. He never proposed a solution on how to help the working class people.

[–] laserm 6 points 20 hours ago

His idea on helping working class is blaming it all on immigrants.

[–] ours 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His idea of "helping the working class" consists of tariffs that don't work the way he says they do and a very likely catastrophic mass deportation program.

And people did vote for those somehow.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 3 points 1 day ago

Some of it yes, but the leopards face eating feast wouldn't exist if they actually got what they thought they were getting. They're just idiots.

[–] Fades 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Less than half of all eligible voters voted. Yes, non voters essentially voted for Trump but it’s not the same thing as literally voting for and endorsing the dumb demented fat fascist.

The majority of eligible voters are just morons that have been successfully distracted and confused (because they’re so dumb).

There is value in the distinction, even tho that value may be quite small in context

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Non voters are even more dumb than Trump voters... at least Trump voters understand the very simple fact that there is power in voting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

but it’s not the same thing as literally voting for and endorsing the dumb demented fat fascist.

In a two party political system it is. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Less than half of all eligible voters voted.

According to Ballotpedia it was 63.7% of eligible voters, which is a very good turnout by US standards.

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2024:_Analysis_of_voter_turnout_in_the_2024_general_election

Still means that only about a third of eligible voters voted for Trump, but, y'know, that's really quite a lot.

[–] Treczoks 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just like Hitler. He got 33%.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's like a magic number for people. You can often find at least 25-30% of people that'll agree to something in politics/views no matter how terrible it would be for them, and the GOP has them locked down.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago

Yes they did vote for it. They chose to ignore it because it was less important to them than [insert single issue] and they have blinders bolted onto their faces.

[–] Nightwingdragon 189 points 2 days ago (18 children)

"The American people did not vote for whatever the hell this is,"

Yeah, actually, they did. Millions of Democrat voters stayed home. Every single state shifted right.

McGovern added, "and you better believe that Democrats will not let Republicans turn the House of Representatives into a rubber stamp for their extremist policies."

You're in the minority party. Republicans have control of all 3 branches of government, and many state governments shifted right.

Simply put, what the fuck are you going to do about it? Democrats have exactly zero power outside of sitting back and watching.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

I mean, there's always options, though if things start getting out of hand I suspect it'll be narrowed down to some rather extreme options

[–] AbidanYre 95 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Democrats have exactly zero power outside of sitting back and watching.

And yet they'll still somehow get blamed for everything that's coming.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 80 points 2 days ago (29 children)

A whole lotta dipshits voted for lower egg prices, or stayed home, voted their useless protest vote or outright voted for donvict, because "genocide joe" or whatever.

But we are all going to get this instead, I guess. It's not like many normal Americans were not warning them...Gaza and egg prices will be unaffected by donvict, maybe made worse by his fumbling idiocracy.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] PugJesus 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, the American people did.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›