this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
748 points (99.2% liked)

News

23599 readers
2912 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
748
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by MicroWave to c/news
 

Summary

Reddit is removing posts linking to Luigi Mangione’s manifesto, citing its longstanding policy against content related to violent acts.

The manifesto, tied to the suspected killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has sparked online fascination and debate.

While Reddit allows discussion of the manifesto within its rules, posts linking to its full text—shared on Substack by journalist Ken Klippenstein—are being removed, angering users.

Critics accuse Reddit of selective moderation, as some sympathize with Mangione’s frustrations over the U.S. healthcare system, which has come under renewed scrutiny after the incident.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 184 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Supposedly his manifesto, we don't even have enough souces to confirm nor deny its legitimacy because mainstream media doesn't want to talk about it.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 days ago (6 children)

A defense attorney on tictok made a really convincing argument about the wording being inconsistent with a well educated author. She pointed out examples of convoluted language that read more like an average person trying to create what they think a smart and highly educated person would write. I am now convinced that the manifesto was planted.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Possibly.

Unless there's an independent, non-government funded, reputable handwriting expert to examine the writing, and compare it to any known writings he made (example: his handwriting in school assignments), I'm gonna be sus of this.

[–] ccunning 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You know our president elect graduated from a “prestigious” school, right?

I’ve had enough bosses with degrees to know they’ll give them to any old dumbass (especially if they have the right ‘profile’ or connections)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m well aware that everyone with a degree from a fancy school isn’t smart or capable. In this case, we’ve seen many examples of the guy’s writing. Moreover, he was valedictorian at his prep school and got an advanced degree in computer science. I think it’s reasonable to conclude that he is smart and well educated.

[–] DokPsy 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't exactly equate to constantly writing well. I've met many engineers and scientists (computer or otherwise) who couldn't give 2 shits about proper English unless it was specifically for a grade, sending to clients, or publication.

Educated doesn't mean that you stop writing informally. It just means you're able to write formally.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For language skills, I think being valedictorian at a competitive prep school is more relevant, since that would require more high quality writing (and discussion of writing) on a consistent basis than any CS program at any level. Regardless, it’s true that no credentials are going to guarantee that someone will never write crap. In this case, we do have examples of casual writing from the suspect (goodreads, twitter) and they generally avoid the kinds of things that the lawyer noted in her video (contradictory language, overly wrought prose). Even if her analysis wouldn’t apply to every person who managed to graduate from an Ivy, to me, in this case, it 100% rings true.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, and not to mention tonally discordant, I couldn't get a sense of a single writing voice or style. It bounces between looks-like-maybe-formal to completely informal and back in the span of a sentence or two.

Now, it being handwritten and if he wrote it in a hurry, maybe that could account for it, not really any time or ability to proofread, but I have my doubts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge 39 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And as far as Manifestos go, it's really more of a postcard.

[–] Today 19 points 5 days ago

Yeah, they keep calling it a 3 page manifesto. One of the people interviewed said it's just 3 pages with writing on them, not like paragraph after paragraph for 3 pages.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Kids these days, not even an entire book-length manifesto like they used to write. SMH My Head 🙄

[–] [email protected] 98 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Considering reddit now has shareholders to answer to, and also considering u/spez is a greedy little pig boy, this tracks and should be of no surprise to anyone.

[–] ninjabard 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Exusia 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IAmTheZeke 23 points 5 days ago

Silly greedy pig boy

[–] [email protected] 85 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The site that hosts literal snuff videos from wars?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Those just glorify the military industrial complex - this event broke the cardinal rule of being effectively anti-capitalist.

[–] blady_blah 4 points 4 days ago

The original Iraq war coverage back in the 90's was all about glorifying the military industrial complex. Videos of smart bombs finding targets from 20,000 ft. Clean and neat. THAT'S glorifying out military and sanitizing our wars.

[–] kava 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Those just glorify the military industrial complex

watching a soldier's legs get blown up by a drone with 3 dead soldiers around him pick up his rifle and shoot himself in the head isn't really what I would call a show of glory

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

It absolutely is. A well balanced person finds such an image revolting (especially if they've seen the resulting damage up close) - but there's a significant number of people who watch that and get gratification from it... sometimes in the form of twisted delight from the novelty - sometimes in a form of dominance/power tripping "Look what 'we' can do to those 'terrorists'".

It's fucking sick and I think the fact that Americans will cheer on reels of war while blushing if someone's boob is briefly visible is a deep condemnation of our society.

[–] kava 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i feel privileged to be able to see war footage. this hasn't really been possible for most of human history. you can look and see the brutality of war and what it really means to "die for your country"

i don't agree with censoring war videos. i'm glad that reddit abstains from this. i'm certain they will be banning it in the future. in think in near future we will not get any media outside of a giant firewall much like China

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Seeing those videos turned me into a pacifist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 46 points 4 days ago (3 children)

“Longstanding”

Which longstanding? Reddit for the longest time had links to all kinds of gore and violence, and still did when I last happened across some before I left. “Longstanding” must mean “since we decided to enforce an interpretation of it when we wanted to go public.”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

"The shareholders demanded we lie to keep advertisers"

[–] SculptusPoe 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Reddit has become a place where you have to fear saying anything. Bots are permabanning people from subs for dark humor and obvious hyperbole. The internet used to be a place you could go where people understood that mode of speech and didn't suspect everybody of being a homicidal maniac.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Reddit is performing propaganda for the US government (who represents the owner/wealthy class), just like most other social media or news sites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tywarth 59 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've seen people get murdered on Reddit. Why aren't they removing those videos?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you look at each wave of subreddit removals, it's only after it gets sufficient news coverage. That's why they aren't removing those videos.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Plus they're likely removing things that advertisers don't like, so if it gets less coverage, advertisers are less likely to notice and report it.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Spaz is worried that people give enough of a shit about him to target him. No one cares about Spez. He runs an internet forum. He has weird dystopian power fantasies where he owns slaves. The dude is a joke.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-for-the-super-rich

[–] Paddzr 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No he isn't.

Let's not act like bunch of idiots. It's all about money. If advertisers see posts they don't like, do you think they want to see their brand next to a post about Luigi?

WE CANNOT BE THIS STUPID. It's how they win. You might be making that comment as a gag or joke, but many clearly aren't reading it as such. The answer is ALWAYS money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Classic Reddit: "Reddit is meant to be a bastion of free speech"

2024 Reddit: "All hail corporate! Click on more ads!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

classic reddit wasn't even about any type of speech(in the comments), it was a news aggregator site. Once it became "social media" it went off the fucking rails.

[–] crystalmerchant 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Be a real shame if someone posted it here

[–] robocall 28 points 5 days ago

“To the Feds, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but has our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

[–] theherk 7 points 4 days ago
[–] venusaur 20 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] robocall 67 points 4 days ago (4 children)

“To the Feds, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but has our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but I've only seen the transcript, not the original.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tangent5280 8 points 4 days ago

I've seen it many times here.

[–] robocall 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

law enforcement has been circulating their own typed copy of the manifesto because it's based off of hand written notes. I'm not sure if any journalists have seen a photo or the original "manifesto"

Reddit and mainstream media's censorship of this story is all about controlling the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

There’s an Atlantic article by Charlie Warzel that references it to try to make his comments seem flippant. The news is heavily trying to create or avoid a narrative on this.

“When Mangione was caught, he had with him a note or manifesto of sorts, less than 300 words long. Near the beginning, it offers the following: “This was fairly trivial.” The phrase is cold, detached, and haunting. It might merely be the garden-variety bravado of a gunman. But the sentence also conjures a possibility that is much harder to sit with (and for the internet to latch onto). Of all the possible outcomes available, the least shared, argued over, and considered is one that the shooter alludes to himself—that what feels to all of us like an era-defining event may ultimately be unremarkable in its brutality, in its inability to effect change, and in how quickly everyone moves on.”

I feel like either of these interpretations is way off the mark. The phrase is more likely him suggesting that it doesn’t take a lot of work or a sharp mind to pull it off, which would be a nightmare for anyone trying to keep it from happening again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer 14 points 4 days ago

They're afraid.

Good.

[–] ccunning 21 points 5 days ago

CEOs be circling the wagons rn

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] berno 4 points 4 days ago

Spez is a cunt

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

This thread appearing on lemmy.world is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

load more comments
view more: next ›