this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
490 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

1554 readers
758 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 5 days ago (4 children)

A Reddit spokesperson, who asked to remain anonymous citing safety concerns, says that manifestos related to violent acts have “long violated our Content Policy” but that “discussion is allowed as long as it doesn’t violate other aspects of our violence policies (e.g., glorification, incitement).”

"You can discuss it, but we don't want you to read the thing you're discussing."

Someone should post the Declaration of Independence, see if that gets removed for being a "manifesto related to violent acts."

Remember the human. Reddit is a place for creating community and belonging, not for attacking marginalized or vulnerable groups of people.

Those poor, poor marginalized and vulnerable CEOs.

[–] timewarp 17 points 5 days ago

Will it matter if people just go watch a Netflix show where the good guys win & feel better?

[–] p3n 5 points 4 days ago

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Yep, definitely inciting violence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“To the Feds, I'll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn't working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but as our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allwed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's it? That's the whole thing? This is what all the censorship buzz is all about? This reads like an unremarkable angsty Reddit comment. Every single social platform is filled with countless of these.

I guess this is qualitatively different because this is him describing something he actually did after the fact rather than the meaningless posturing most other people do. At that point though, is it still even "inciting violence"? The violence was already incited. I don't see him explicitly threatening more or rallying others to do more. "Here's why I did the thing" is not the same thing as "I'm going to do the thing" or "you should do the thing, too".

The censorship of this is stupid. I hope this gets Streisand'd to the heavens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

really? it looks remarkably un-angsty to me! i'd expect someone who shoots a dude to write something way more angry, but this is just matter-of-fact "shit sucks here's why"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

they're terrified of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seems like a textbook example of why federation is better than something owned by some rich assholes

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think about famous photo of the pirate bay cofounder.

These are the people we want to manage the internet, not someone who blocks information because it pisses off their billionaire friends.

[–] buddascrayon 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile Russia and China are making their own little "internets" for their citizens to make a nice neat little box where nary a bad thought can find it's way into the public sphere. And here in the U.S. we've been fighting off such measure for over 2 decades but now the Republicans have the house, the Senate and their useful idiot, they can go to town.

It's gonna be high time to start looking more heavily into mesh networks than ever before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Spez is scared. He has pissed off a bunch of people but he hasn't denied healthcare too them so he is just a reactionary coward.

[–] daddy32 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

he hasn't denied healthcare

Unless he fired those people. America!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostysauce 3 points 4 days ago

The guy that thinks he would definitely be a leader if society were to collapse is actually a giant piss-baby? Who would've thunk it...

[–] surph_ninja 26 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Reddit also has policies against posting violence, but apparently it doesn’t count if you post Ukrainians or Israelis proudly showing off their slaughter.

Reddit allows violence, so long as it is in line with the status quo.

[–] Breezy 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There used to be subs like watchpeopledie and makemycoffin. I barely use reddit anymore but i wouldnt he suprised if there was still a part that has similar content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon 5 points 4 days ago

Reddit allows violence, so long as it isn't against the rich. ~~is in line with the status quo.~~

This is more to the point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 days ago

Israeli politicians and pundits call for violence and genocide against defenseless civilians in Gaza and nobody bats an eye but one member of a tier of people that make enough money to hire their own private army gets capped, and everyone loses their mind.

If your job requires you to ruin people's lives or cause their untimely death, it is reasonable to assume that you would need private security. I hate to victim blame (not really) but it seems to me that it was UHC CEO's own fault that he got taken out by an amateur. I'd say do better next time but...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I guess spez is asking for the UHC treatment.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Always has been

[–] LengAwaits 30 points 4 days ago (10 children)
[–] IndiBrony 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really don't think there could be a worse way to present this information 😅

[–] weeeeum 10 points 4 days ago

Make it look inconspicuous. Its just a silly meme! Theres nothing else here. What's so dangerous about a bunch of words?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] olafurp 23 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I think Reddit ToS has something about condoning or inciting violence which is being used to broadly in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Inciting violence is a crime in most of the world. Celebrating someone being dead is just considered rude by social norms. There is a huge difference.

Condoning violence is meaningless without proper definition as it can mean many things in many contexts. That's why it's important to look at the context of each individual post or comment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (4 children)

.world did too didn’t it?

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As I understood it, they clarified that we're not allowed to call for violence and stuff like that. The manifesto itself is fine.

[–] pdxfed 29 points 5 days ago (6 children)

They locked the news post entirely because some comments weren't bootlicking. My comment was removed for saying "can't imagine why that happened" which neither "calls for nor celebrates violence" as the mod stated, the latter "celebrating" being his or her invention to broaden the scope of the censoring of comments outside the stated server and community rules.

I'm current researching alternatives and have no idea where to go. I'm pretty drained after a year on Lemmy trying to make this work. I'd look at mastodon but seems like it's more Twitter than longer form discussion and boards.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Even when dealing with bullshit like this, trying to "rules lawyer" online when a moderation group has made their stance known loud and clear rarely works out well.


Also, just in the rare case you didn't know, Lemmy is more than just .world. It's not like Reddit where you're just stuck with the Reddit admins.

You could register an account on any instance you want. The overwhelming majority of them would still allow you to interact with content from .world, but the worst the .world admins could do would be to ban you from a .world version of a "subreddit".

I've been very happy with the admin of lemmy.dbzer0.com, a former mod (I think former head mod) of the piracy subreddit that resigned with the API mess. Doesn't seem to take action lightly or capriciously, content to let the community make decisions through open discussion and polls rather than just iron fist their wishes through.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Former head mod or piracy. I built it from the ground-up in fact. Didn't resign. Got admin-removed (potentially coup-ed) because I blacked out the sub and pushed very actively towards a lemmy migration (which is why /c/piracy is thriving)

Also former top mod of /r/anarchism (x2) but I demoted myself voluntarily (x2) when I got asked nicely :D

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If you otherwise like lemmy I'd recommend dbzer0 or lemm.ee. Both are kinda large instances which ideally would be avoided, but both of them are also very fair with moderation and don't defederate from many places, which means you can decide whether or not to block one on your own. I also have heard decent stuff about .zip, so that might be worth checking out.

It does suck how many communities ended up centralized on .world, but a lot of the news related ones that are the most susceptible to over-moderation have fairly active alternatives on other instances.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Dbzer0 is where I went and after seeing all the content I wasn't seeing because world had defederated, I'm really enjoying myself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I think .world's reasoning was that it's "unreliable source" rather than "NO MANIFESTO ALOWED!!!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

A LW mod said that the manifesto would be allowed

If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

ok, so will someone post a link to it here, just for Streisand effect purposes?

[–] Supervisor194 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I confess I am surprised by the level of concern these fuckwits are displaying.

If nothing else comes from this, I hope a few conservatives/alt-right types have at least some of the veil lifted as they are constantly gaslit about what to think about this guy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Anything Shapiro is trash jfc

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Fuck Reddit!

[–] Evotech 17 points 4 days ago

Talk about Streisand effect...

[–] werefreeatlast 12 points 4 days ago

The words are upsetting their AI baby.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

But Reddit also seems to be inconsistently removing the manifesto, as we were able to find a link to the manifesto in Reddit search without much work. Reddit’s new AI-powered Answers tool also showed me information about the manifesto and where I could find it.

hehe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Yepp, they go hard even in smaller communities. Seems to be some automated system handing out warnings and bans left and right.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Slightly off topic, but yesterday at the top of my Lemmy feed there was a screenshot of a slack channel where (supposedly nyt journalists) were discussing either posting his writings or images of his face.

I went back to look for it and can't find it. Anybody know where I can find it?

load more comments
view more: next ›