this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
1036 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27003 readers
4830 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yer in one

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bosht 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard for me to believe this strictly because A) those things are fucking expensive, and B) aren't they like ....hella fucking fast??

[–] dyc3 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

They are not that fast. At least none that I've seen. I'd say they go like 10mph tops.

Quadcopters would be more efficient financially and more reliable. Probably faster too.

[–] Acters 1 points 4 hours ago

fr not encouraging anything illegal, buuut. The robot dog should only be used if the drone needs a place to stop mid way from the check point because of battery limitations or weather, as like a mobile outpost/command center to prevent easily spot able routing from places. Having the robo dog do the entire trip is quite wasteful on resources.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I was expecting this from quadcopters. I'd have thought they'd be more difficult to catch

[–] WarlordSdocy 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but this was also advertising the service, a quadrocopter wouldn't do that as good. If anything I'm surprised they are just sacrificing the robo dog considering how expensive those are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Once the cops find it, there's no stakeout-proof way to recover it.

[–] Acters 1 points 4 hours ago

Unless the robo dog doubled as a drone to make a quick getaway, it's just plainly an expensive walking mistake

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 4 points 7 hours ago

The dog was a decoy

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Untraceable drug delivery? Sign me up

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 25 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Trivially traceable. Just follow the dog (discretely).

[–] ApatheticCactus 9 points 5 hours ago

Ugh, I hate those missions.

[–] Jiggle_Physics 51 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is EXACTLY the type of thing I expected from a cyberpunk dystopia

[–] Zess 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Right? Like did the creator of this image think more policing is less dystopian?

[–] Jiggle_Physics 5 points 6 hours ago

Militarized police, criminal syndicates using robots that destroy evidence when caught, to smuggle drugs, I don't think this person knows what cyberpunk is

[–] Emerald 25 points 13 hours ago

That's awesome, I love drug dealing robo-dogs

[–] Pirtatogna 28 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

To be honest I'm more worried because of Moscow than any robot dog.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 12 points 11 hours ago

Remember to tip your police officer and you'll be fine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 90 points 17 hours ago

Reminds me of this meme

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

Bump, Ubu, bump. Good dog.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That's odd.
I think most of the time they just use dead drops, it's much safer.

Courier sticks drugs to a tree, walks away, sends a geo location of a drop to a buyer. Done.

Druggie just has to geolocate it, never meet in person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What happened to the good old days when you got into the back of a car with a shady guy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thats for like 100 or less. Or for really risky dealers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

100 what? USD? If so, I used to routinely buy around that amount back when I was a cokehead and I still did it by getting in the back of the car. Perhaps it's just different cultures. I can't even imagine myself picking drugs from a tree (?)

[–] feedum_sneedson 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Paypal? Venmo? Monzo? Or in other words, with great ease...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be uneasy with electronically transferring funds for illicit drugs, cash seems wiser.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How does the dealer get the cash without potentially exposing their location?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes, indeed. Hence the earlier, "HOW GET MONEY?" someone so eloquently asked in relation to this dead drop method. You could arrange your own dead drop for the dealer's payment I guess, or stuff the money in to the same tree. It's all a bit fraught, and requires you both to trust each other even more than a deal normally would. The system seems to be pretty flawed. Guess it works of you're happy to leave an indelible record of you transacting with this person and if you trust them to actually put the goods there rather than just take the money since you'll never see them and have no recourse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Im actually amazed that while we supposedly have robo dogs we still have photos so blurry that you cant see shit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I mean it's just matter of priority I suppose, if something is relatively cheap and effective there's no need to invest into 4k or higher quality cameras. Especially when you don't have the storage for a week of footage or few days that loop over each other. But that's just my assumption, if 4k becomes the norm and storage gets bigger and cheaper we might see good quality security footage.

[–] squozenode 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: 4k camera modules are getting rapidly cheaper, it's standard in cell phones now. Gyroscope modules used to be crazy expensive, then Nintendo ordered 400 million of them for the Wii.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

The 3 industries that will always have the money and be on the forefront of innovation:

  1. Military
  2. Drugs
  3. Porn
[–] [email protected] 26 points 16 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] janonymous 76 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly the Cyberpunk we expected. Cyberpunk has never been shy about being a dystopia.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 8 points 11 hours ago

Practically the definition of the genre. It's not typically "punk" if it's a glistening utopia.

Using robots to do conduct black market trade under the nose of the police sounds extremely punk.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In this case the dystopia is the prohibition and storm troopers, not the robot dog.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks 104 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Sounds extremely fishy. Those robo-dogs are expensive, they are slow - too slow to really act as couriers, and this is supposed to be Moscow - A city in a country under rather strict tech embagos, where you can't get them at the next corner shop.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I can't tell too much from the picture but I believe that's a Chinese robot and China will ship to Russia from what I understand. And I've seen those as low as $1600 and anyone can order them online. It still sounds fishy maybe the cops want an excuse to get their own

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not to mention the Russian police uniform doesn't look like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

I stand corrected!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

A city in a country under rather strict tech embagos

Chinese tech is not embargoed and, despite less cool videos, actually widely deployed.

load more comments
view more: next ›