this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
302 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Biden administration finalized a $6.6 billion award to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) for its Arizona chip factories, securing CHIPS Act funding before President-elect Trump takes office.

TSMC plans to invest $65 billion in three Phoenix fabs, creating thousands of jobs and bolstering U.S. semiconductor production.

The funds, part of the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on foreign-made chips.

Despite Trump’s criticism of the subsidies, the agreement is legally binding, ensuring continued progress on the largest foreign investment in U.S. manufacturing history.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] credo 111 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] dance_ninja 29 points 2 days ago

As is the Republican way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Yep. Tariff will make prices high for things we don't even currently manufacture. If we do see anything getting manufactured in 4 years time and prices go down he'll say he did it.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Despite his age, wish we had Biden for another four years. He actually knows what American interests are.

[–] anon6789 42 points 2 days ago

It's a shame we've heard more about Trump these last four years than we have about the actual president, as it does seem a lot of good was done, but most people probably wouldn't know it as a pile of buffoons have been shouting over it the whole time. I don't know if there's been a single day in the last 8 years I haven't seen his name or heard his ramblings.

I'm sad to be losing the protections that have been attempted for the environment and green energy, and the realization I had yesterday that we'll be losing Lina Khan, who looked to have such a promising career helping the American people. There were a lot of flaws and oversights still, and the weak support of Ukraine and the situation is Gaza are pretty damning mistakes, but overall it felt like things had been going in a good direction from where we were with COVID and Trump.

As someone who went into the Biden presidency with extremely low expectations, I think he largely did good given with both what he had to work with, and with the expectation that something would have been done by the justice system to ensure Trump was kept out of office legally. I guess add that to the huge oversight list...

I'm left very torn on how to approach the future. If the left starts playing dirty like the right, I don't feel that will get them to stop doing it. When both sides are just resorting to dirty tricks, I don't know how we get a civil society back. At the same time, counting on norms and elected officials respecting their offices seems to be all but dead, at least if we wish to still to try combat some level of authoritarianism.

I would have much rather had a dottering old man eating ice cream and telling old anecdotes than anything coming our way though.

[–] mlg 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Taking bets on whether we'll actually see the latest litho tech chips come out of the Arizona fab or RISC-V from China fabs will overtake ARM first.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Is the Arizona factory supposed to be state-of-the art? I had heard we were more concerned with just getting any kind of chip production stateside, since most electronics don't actually use the latest chips (missiles, toasters, etc.).

[–] this_1_is_mine 4 points 1 day ago

Kind of a smart bet. But if Donnie doesn't stop China from taking Taiwan everybody's prices will go through the roof In the meantime.