this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
103 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19145 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
103
The Not-So-Woke Generation Z (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

Summary

Gen Z’s reputation as a reliably progressive generation has been challenged by recent U.S. election results, showing a noticeable shift toward conservative voting, particularly among young men.

Many young people struggle with financial security, psychological safety, and optimism about the future. Trump tapped into their anxieties of a frightening world that’s worsening.

Issues like inflation, financial stability, and safety now rank higher than traditional progressive causes for many young people.

Additionally, conservative influences from figures like Joe Rogan and family ties to Gen X parents may have nudged Gen Z rightward, reflecting their complex and evolving priorities.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaderick 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Trump tapped into their anxieties of a frightening world that’s worsening

No reflection on how Trump exponentially makes that worse?

So they’re stupider than we thought. Nice.

Edit: at least the ones that vote

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We are now seeing the results of Bush's No Child Left Behind.

Edit: also:

For years, Gen Z has been either derided or praised for supposedly being “woke.” Its members have been called snowflakes, mocked for performative “slacktivism” and embracing trigger warnings, and described (favorably and unfavorably) as climate warriors and gun-control activists.

Pretty sure that was us Millennials. That stuff started in the late 2000s when all the Occupy shit popped off, when Gen-Z were just kids. Meanwhile we were handing them tablets and phones to keep them quiet and giving them unrestricted access to the Internet, beginning their radicalization right under our noses. Surprise, now leftist mom/dad have a Nazi son/daughter.

[–] CharlesDarwin 20 points 1 week ago

For years, Gen Z has been either derided or praised for supposedly being “woke.” Its members have been called snowflakes, mocked for performative “slacktivism” and embracing trigger warnings, and described (favorably and unfavorably) as climate warriors and gun-control activists.

Change a few labels, and this sounds like the same stuff aimed at Gen X - called slackers and the "political correctness" hysteria really started to take off when we hit early adulthood, etc.

The more things change....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I guess it's time for a Family Ties sitcom reboot

[–] TexasDrunk 3 points 1 week ago

Sha la la la

[–] thisorthatorwhatever 2 points 1 week ago

Except the parents aren't hippies but run a Yoga studio and make podcast to stay afloat, are apolitical and don't vote. Alex's only successful venture has been to transform his parents' yoga retreat into an oligarchs brothel catering to Russian billionaires and Chinese whales.

[–] ChocoboRocket 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not voting has the same consequences, so those aren't too smart either.

Gen Z are entitled like boomers, but with almost no economic prospects outside their parents.

Which makes sense, since loads of Gen Z were priced out of a future before they could even start earning, so there's no point in giving effort

At least Trump will guarantee Gen Z nearly unlimited well paying work if they're interested in bounty hunting immigrants and tracking fertility

[–] Thrashy 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

GenZ is the generation raised by helicopter parents, whose late-Boomer-to-early-GenX parents went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that they never faced any challenges. Of course they'd have some odd ideas about how the world ought to work, after spending their entire childhood and early adulthood with Mom and Dad working strenuously to shield them from personal struggles, emotional distress, and the consequences of their actions. What remains to be seen is how those attitudes shift as the rubber hits the road and their parents lose the ability to protect them from the increasingly dire state of the world. I suspect it'll be an even three-way split between blithe entitlement, despair and withdrawal, and an impulse to step up and do something about it.

[–] CharlesDarwin 4 points 1 week ago

GenZ is the generation raised by helicopter parents, whose late-Boomer-to-early-GenX parents went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that they never faced any challenges.

Weren't the same kinds of things aimed at kids raised by Dr. Spock? In other words, the boomers?

[–] thisorthatorwhatever 1 points 1 week ago

You joke, but ... fore many white men these job prospects (cop, immigration office, jail guard) are a reality. The factories have all moved away. If you're a contractor, doing roofing or painting for example, you're competing against illegal immigrants that work under the table.

[–] very_well_lost 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld:

You don't run for president with the voters you want, you run for president with the voters you have.

Stupid or not, these are the voters we have, and Democrats need to learn how to reach at least some of them if they ever want to win another election.

[–] Makhno 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Que the dems swinging far right

[–] very_well_lost 0 points 1 week ago

Sadly, yeah... D:

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

No Child Left Behind

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lots of people just stayed home 🤷

[–] grue 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And they're even stupider.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the two most salient points here are:

  1. Podcasts

TV and radio are dead, social media is a wasteland. Podcasts are reaching young folks, especially men.

Which brings me to…

  1. Young men are in freefall

They’re doing worse than previous generations did at their age, across every metric you can imagine, and they’re also doing worse than young women.

That’s not to say we should stifle women’s success!

But if all you have to offer young men is a lecture on their unearned privilege, I think it’s not surprising that they take their business elsewhere.

Importantly: This doesn’t make them right.

But if we don’t figure this out, we’re fucked. We have to have a positive message for men who are struggling and desperate. If we don’t offer a plan, guess who will?

[–] thisorthatorwhatever 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't worry the Dem's won't figure it out, LOL. The party is stuck in 1990.

"...all you have to offer young men is a lecture on their unearned privilege..." This, ten thousand times this. But, the Democratic party really has nothing to offer men ... please don't shoot the messenger. Blue collar work is hard, it chews up the body, saying you're bringing these jobs back isn't a recipe for hope.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Crazy idea.

Maybe the blue collar jobs should have a living wage?

[–] TropicalDingdong 18 points 1 week ago

Only a small portion of GenZ was incentivized to show up this election. Interpreting the fact that only right wing GenZ showed up shouldn't be treated as a condemnation of a generation. White women didn't show up for Harris either. Would we make the same condemnation?

It all comes down to the fact that Democrats offered little and less in the four years where they could have accomplished something, and when called out for that, those critical were told to shut the fuck up.

What the Democrats offered was right wing politics: their base won't vote for it. Which isn't to say that groups like GenZ or women won't show up if you actually offer them something they want to vote for.

This loss can be dropped squarely on the shoulders of the deeply toxic "Blue No Matter Who/ Blue MAGA/ You can't be critical of Democrats because you only have two choices" philosophy. It was seriously at work here on Lemmy, and moderation and prominent posters here (and across the internet) did real damage filtering down forums like c/Politics, r/Poltiics, etc to select for a narrow and now very proven wrong approach to electoralism.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

... or marketing, plain old marketing, advertising and public relations.

You can blast the airwaves with the same message over and over again eventually people just believe it ... either because they are lazy, don't care, it doesn't immediately matter to them or they just don't want to be bothered learning the details. It's the same process of convincing people to either like Coke or Pepsi.

Goebbels and the Nazi party easily mastered it in the 30s .... tell a lie, repeat it often enough and eventually it will be come true ... if you tell a lie, tell a big lie, the biggest lie you can make and everyone will believe it.

It all boils down to money and marketing ... whoever dumps the money into one party, politician, political movement will get the votes eventually and convince everyone of whatever reality they want them to believe.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Complex and evolving priorites

Incels, what will they prioritize next?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incoming Subsidy for Tesla Sex Robots

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly, if the weird "men's movement" and incels actually got their way on having great robot sex wives, and they thought that meant all the uppity real females have now been "replaced" or outsourced or whatever, would they stop being so angry? I do have to wonder....something tells me they'd still be butthurt about stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If sex robots were actually a thing...

There is a certain segment of incels that would probably be very happy with this, if it was at least somewhat socially normalized, they would probably be fine.

Thats the segment of incels that are more driven by just having no access to sex, already more or less fine with being social recluses.

Granted, that could be accomplished right now by just giving them fleshlights or something, combined with less social stigma around masterbating.

I really do think thats a non zero % of incels.

But there's also a likely much larger % of incels that are more driven by a sense of revenge for all the times they've been rejected, driven by a need to have a living thinking thing to boss around or torment, an active hatred.

Those incels would not be sated by sex robots.

....

Whats more financially / pragmatically / realistically likely in my estimation is that if an actual sexbot can ever be designed, you'd just end up with more, legalized robot prostitutes in brothels.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There is a certain segment of incels that would probably be very happy with this, if it was at least somewhat socially normalized

I think it may take a while before normalized, but then, I remember how quickly it went from extremely rude and annoying for someone to take a call on a cell phone, to constantly happening, all the time, everywhere....some norms can change pretty quickly.

But there’s also a likely much larger % of incels that are more driven by a sense of revenge for all the times they’ve been rejected, driven by a need to have a living thinking thing to boss around or torment, an active hatred.

This is exactly what I was thinking. I think a lot of them are just replaying their middle school/high school experiences and want to take that out on women. Maybe some kind of Westworld scenario might suffice for another percentage of them...

if an actual sexbot can ever be designed

I have not looked, but I would bet more than a few companies exist that have this as their business model.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have not looked, but I would bet more than a few companies exist that have this as their business model.

AFAIK all that exist are possble life sized dolls with basically internal fleshlight cavities, some talk a bit as well.

Sex is actually a very complex and delicate manuever from the POV of a robot designer.

If the female sexbot suddenly jerks or collapses, it may have just snapped your dick in half. Penile fracture and groin muscle tears are real and extremely painful and debilitating.

A humanoid robot would also probably weigh double or triple what a same sized human would weigh.

If you had the tech required to make a reliably safe sexbot, that would be the same level of tech to just actually make humanoid robots that can say, work in a McDonalds more efficiently than a human.

Its a pipe dream (pun intended) for now.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly, I think if they had something that was safe (enough? - and we are talking about putting autonomous cars on the road in greater numbers, so in the scheme of things, a malfunctioning robot might be extremely painful, but maybe not deadly) in the bedroom, they would get snapped up. Add in the ability to carry on a conversation - and I hear some people are already falling in love with chatbots - and cooking/cleaning, I think that'd be enough for a lot of these guys, assuming the stigma gets blunted over time.

Hey, if it brings down the temperature for this bunch, I'm all for it. I doubt many of them are too complicated - something that lets them bust a nut and makes a sandwich for them and remembers nearly every detail about them might go pretty far...

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 1 week ago

A significant portion of Lemmy believes that if men don’t get sex they turn Republican so maybe they’ll be normal if we get them a sex robot.

[–] mhague 2 points 1 week ago

Well nobody could be different from us. Nobody could be wired differently. If they vote for Nazi policy then they must be confused and in need of correcting. It's impossible for bad people to exist, they're all just sheep that need shepherding.

Maybe if everything is fixed and the world is perfect and our country is perfect it will fix things? Maybe the Nazis go away?

Anything to avoid facing reality and getting our hands dirty removing Nazis from our country.