this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
89 points (89.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
3748 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Should I be looking for a different job?

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 2 points 28 minutes ago

The resistance infiltrating the enemy base in disguise can get a lot of work done. Especially if it's long term and you don't even need to sneak around.

Even just a low level functionary who's not a nazi or a terrible person makes my time dealing with a government agency better. There's not an automatic moral imperative to bounce.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

A few months ago a german activist (I think it was Arne Semsrot) wrote a book about how low and middle positions in government agencies can work against the governments intentions in case of a extreme right wing takeover by the AFD. Though I don't know, if it was translated to english or would be 1 to 1 applicable to the USA.

[–] Madblood 6 points 4 hours ago

The answers to both of your questions are probably yes it's okay, and yes you should probably be looking for another job.
Are you morally/ethically okay with your agency's mission? With your role in it? If you are, then the new administration's policies may not be reason enough to leave. You pretty much have to work somewhere. If the answer is no, you probably would have already been looking for another job.
Should you be looking for another job? Probably, depending on what your agency is and it's mission. If TFG and Project2025 have their way, many federal government agencies will be defunded and/or privatized, and pretty much toothless when it comes to enforcement. We already saw what happened to the EPA under the first Trump administration. If yours is in danger of that you should be preparing a backup plan. I wouldn't want to give up a government job, but I would want to be ready if I got RIF'd, or if I got fed up with the bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So assuming you're an American. I hate to break it to you but your government has done way worse stuff than elect an orange guy. I seriously doubt everything done holds up to the slightest scrutiny to your moral and ethical code. The only difference is now you are aware of it. If it was me I would ask myself if I felt guilty for the work I had done already. If I did I would stop if not I wouldn't.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 36 minutes ago

The slightest effort at extrapolation makes this whole idea monumentally short-sighted.

[–] jeffw 73 points 20 hours ago

I’d say it’s more important than ever. Leaving just allows the “yes” men to get more power and gives more control to the regime you dislike/disagree with.

Resist

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Yup. Watch The Good Place, then ask again.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago

Do you feel that your “customers” are the administration or the general public? Whom do you feel that you are serving in your job? Do you feel that the directions given to you by your administration are legal and safe and reasonable? Do you feel that the directions given to you by your administration cause a disadvantage to yourself or your “customers”?

You could try to clutch at straws to justify staying in your job. You might be able to reasonably determine that your feelings for your administration don’t affect the performance of your job. Maybe staying in your job is the best way to benefit your “customers” and obstruct the administration.

Only you can decide how you feel and what is an appropriate match for your own moral and ethical position.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I work for the USPS. We took an oath to the constitution and it's very easy to understand why. The Postal Service is a necessary component of democracy as long as it remains true to what its supposed to be, which is a pipeline of information between any two points in the world. We can debate the legitimacy of that need after the internet, but there are vital services the USPS provides that the internet can't.

I don't like the direction things are going, but i still want to be a part of that. All i can do is make sure the mail I get is getting where it's supposed to be.

If you believe in what you do and that's important to you, then stick it out. If it's not, then that's fine, but you may want to get out for your mental health.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for your service

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Haha, i never served and this is just a job. It just happens to be one that i feel has some contribution to democracy and i try to hold on to that.

Thanks, though, if this isn't meant in jest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

You're a public servant. That's cool

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Delivering the mail is every bit - if not more - important than killing foreigners for oil

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you. That's a very considered response.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm serious about the mental health thing, though. I've had to develope a certain mind set to keep things from driving me nuts: incompetent supervisors and lazy coworkers. The unions really protect us, but the system most definitely gets abused and management is hamstrung to do anything about it i guess.

To me, work is a circus. People do stupid sit? I laugh and keep doing what I'm supposed to be doing.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 51 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes it is - you can continue to do good in the ways you can manage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Until they get purged for not towing the party line.

[–] halcyoncmdr 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Better to do the work they can to help until they're forced out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully they are financially stable and have good enough job prospects to just be able to find a new job of equal pay in their area fairly quickly on a timetable of 'i have no idea when i am going to be blacklisted'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also - government jobs often have to offer severance for non-performance related termination.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Unless they just rewrite those rules/regulations to avoid that.

Which is their whole plan.

[–] KeepFlying 31 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Working for the agency isn't the problem on its own. If your job requires you to do something that is against your morals, resist up to and including loudly leaving that job if that's what's required. But until then it's more important than ever to stick it out and push to make things better any way you can.

[–] dhork 35 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You work for the government, not for whatever yoyo happens to be President at any given time. You wouldn't necessarily leave a private sector job if the CEO changed.

OTOH, this administration has been making a point of wanting to make government so small they can drown it in the bathtub. Unless you work in one of the very few Project 2025 priorities, they will probably eliminate your job eventually. So keep a keen eye out for alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’d leave my job if Musk would become CEO at my job.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago

Bro I may sabotage it until I get dismissed and use that insider information to short his stock. See how elmo likes being on the losing end of stock manipulation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

Yes.

Schindler couldn't do it alone.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago

We need people like you to resist when you feel like it’s the right thing to do. You took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. As cringe as it may sound, we need you and others like you to do that now more than ever…because there is an obvious threat.

[–] theywilleatthestars 6 points 19 hours ago

See if you can gum up the works, and if you feel yourself changing, get out.

[–] spankmonkey 7 points 20 hours ago

Of course, as long as the work you do doesn't become hostile to your own beliefs. I mean, people that process social security still provide benefits to millions of people no matter who is in charge, at least until Republicans destroy it.

[–] SelfProgrammed 5 points 19 hours ago

At the very least, make them fire you. Don't quit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I know this is cliche as hell, but only you are going to be familiar enough with your position to be able to know if you can effect change, prevent harm, or if your labor won't be able to do much but perpetuate things you stand against. Id wager it wouldn't happen all at once, but eventually you may see a red line you don't want to cross. Use the time you have now to keep an eye out for a job listing that looks like a Cinderella slipper, and if you start seeing that red line coming up before that happens, then start to seriously consider whatever offers you can find that seem workable to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No one can answer that question but you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

Of course. But one can hope for insight and help in answering it, no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, thatt's a question only you can answer. But goes without saying for any job.

Ask yourself:

  • Will you be able to sleep peacefully at night knowing what job you're doing and who you're doing it for?
  • Are your morals stronger then job security you're getting?
  • Can you stay on the job and inact change from within?
  • Can you refuse certain tasks you don't feel conformable with?
  • Can you steer / influence the work that you and/or the agency does?
[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The first Trump presidency is known for the longest government shutdown in US history.

Job stability is not a given for federal employment anymore.

Other than that, I would say non-defense jobs are certainly worth maintaining institutional knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So long as you have some savings, a government shutdown is more a vacation than anything. Back pay has always been given to employees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I would not be surprised if this was repealed (if only as an effort to further purge government employees):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Employee_Fair_Treatment_Act_of_2019

Prior to this, my understanding is that back pay was given in good faith, not by actual requirements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

10s of Thousands of people motivated by not getting a week or so of pay because you couldn't get your act together is bad for reelection prospects.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

If administration does not change agency’s policy in the the way it contradicts your moral I’d say it’s ok