this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
761 points (99.9% liked)

expectationvsreality

177 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sterile_Technique 98 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...oh that's a lot worse than 200%

[–] Subtracty 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Very scientific approach.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I worked in one as an evening job while at school 20 years ago. They took pride in this stuff back then. You were trained on how to place the fillings in just the right way to make it look like it should. You had a booklet you had to memorise on it. I remember people took pride when customers remarked "wow it actually looks like the picture".

They had area managers and secret shoppers come in and grade you on this stuff, and you'd get put on out of hours training if you failed (they would do stuff like get a group in the back just cutting all of the left over bread from the previous day, to learn to cut it at just the right angle).

Not any more, and hasn't been like that in some time.

[–] General_Shenanigans 20 points 1 month ago

I worked for Subway back in ‘99 when I was in high school. We took pride in it back then, as well. Now, the pictures still didn’t match the product back then. The steak was a relatively new product back then, and I do remember the photos being sort-of like this one: All the meat pushed toward the camera. But nobody cared. You got to watch that shit being made right in front of you. It was always status quo as far as I can remember that pictures never matched what you got at a fast food place. BUT, if you did a good job, you’d sometimes learn just how happy somebody was to get a sandwich EXACTLY the fucking way they wanted it to be.

That’s not to say there’s not something very wrong there and that a line shouldn’t be drawn, though. They’ve gotten away with it for far too long, I think. In fact, I don’t think it was ever this extreme in the manipulation. Yeah, I’m going to actually side with you on this one and say that they definitely went too far in the image manipulation department. Expectations are everything, and I would actually hate to work at Subway now if this is what people’s expectations are set at. You would probably almost never get that stoked customer that got an exactly what they wanted. In a customer service field, that’s basically a death rattle.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Very interesting

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)

When you only have so much meat to work with, it's vital to at least learn how to photograph it flatteringly.

[–] Subtracty 20 points 1 month ago
[–] Tronn4 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe they just trimmed the bread back to make the meat appear more substantial...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’ve watched videos on how they photograph food and let’s just say that this cheese is probably some coloured PVA glue or something.

Due to the time it can take to shoot food and the heat from the lights it’s not ideal (I think they should be forced to photograph the actual product and this is all absurd, but I’m just talking about this photo) to use the actual food.

I’ve seen glue in lieu of milk for cereal adverts, as one such example.

It’s pretty interesting from a technical viewpoint and you can search it up on YouTube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I like it that Subway's bread can't be considered as bread, because of the high ammount of sugar.

In 2020, it ruled that the sugar content in Subway's savory sandwich bread was above the legal limit required to be labeled "bread," according to the country's Value-Added Tax Act of 1972, which states that for a baked good to qualify as bread, its sugar content cannot exceed 2% of the total weight of flour.

[–] roguetrick 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

2 percent is frankly a little low for the bar sugar by weight to still be considered bread, but 10 percent(which is where they were at) is obviously outrageous. If you want a really aggressive rise while keeping a high hydration, adding sugar and heat can get you there. I don't think you're making bread anymore beyond 4 percent though.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

Maybe I'm too European for this, but I would never have thought of putting sugar in regular bread. Even milk buns don't have added sugar in them, unless you count lactose.

…I'll have to try this, because it sounds off to me. Like putting a dishwasher in the bathroom. Not really insane. But I'd quietly judge someone who does that.

Edit: Not great for bread.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

The only reason I would use a very small amount of sugar is to jump start the yeast. That shouldn't even take a teaspoon though, and it's only necessary when you have to get a faster rise.

The bread tastes better when you let it rise slowly though.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

every shred of meat is pictured. the rest of the bun is empty and its propped up and angled as such to make it appear 'full'.

arbys does the same thing. you have to literally pile all the meat on one edge of the bun and take the picture at a certain angle to hide the emptiness behind it.

[–] superweeniehutjrs 32 points 1 month ago

The image of a food staging crew and photographer also having an independent auditor signing off that yes that is 2.2oz of meat popped into my head. Auditor is dragged into court with scale calibration reports all over a sandwich. No matter what it is deceitful advertising.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I worked at Arby’s in the 90s, we did not have to fake the meat back then.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does that make it legal in your country?

There's no way companies should be able to abuse these technicalities. Don't you have teleological interpretations of laws - meaning laws being interpreted by considering the intent behind them?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I just want to know why the Subways in my city are now both more expensive and less tasty/filling than any other sub/hoagie options in the area.

I don't go to subway anymore because the last footlong I bought cost me $13, no drink no chips, and was skimpy as hell. The next day I went to a deli/convenience chain and bought a $10 sandwich that was longer, fresher, and thicker.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

In the past, they used their relatively low prices to gain customers and are now exploiting people who just go there out of habit or don't pay much attention to prices. A lot of the large chains are now more expensive and have worse quality than smaller stores and chains now.

[–] Hiatus 9 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Same. You can get firehouse for the same price as subway here. It's a no brainer. We still have a few quiznos around as well, which are marginally better than subway. I can't imagine why anyone would visit one anymore outside of it literally being the only option in the immediate area.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DynoNoob 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to get their meatballs subs because they were fairly cheap ($5 per footlong). It's supposed to have eight meatballs per sub. Once they gave me seven. I thought maybe the guy made a mistake and didn't think much of it. The next time I went, it was seven meatballs again. That was the last time I had Subways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tikiporch 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We need to incorporate portion veracity into food sanitation checks. Food safety guy goes in, buys all three sizes of fries, weighs them all, compares to the nutritional fact values posted by the company.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got a large fry from BK a couple weeks ago and it had less fries than my wife’s medium. BK’s response was that mine probably settled more than hers.

[–] Tikiporch 17 points 1 month ago

A nice way of saying Fuck Off, basically. No consumer protections for this kind of thing exist, at least in the USA. Other than Weights and Measures enforcing scale calibrations if you buy things by weight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

After this is over I'd like them to look into Honey Bunches of Oats cereal. The name starts with Honey and the word "honey" is used more than any other noun on the box, which is designed to look like the stuff is dripping with honey, but in the ingredients list honey is way down at the bottom between salt and food coloring.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Raisin Bran...barely a raisin in it now.

[–] LovableSidekick 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Interesting - Instead of Kellogg's I buy the non-name brand at Safeway and it has tons of raisins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weeeeum 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is why I haven't eaten fast food in years. Precisely because I haven't had good fast food in years.

All the while it's more expensive than ever. Why are execs surprised sales are dwindling?

[–] FordBeeblebrox 8 points 1 month ago

The $5 foot long was their whole ad campaign for years, now they’re running ads about LOWERING the foot long price to 6.99. The quality never improved and quantity has gone down, but still they must charge more to make line go up forever. It’s insane

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango 14 points 1 month ago

That's at least 500%.

[–] finitebanjo 7 points 1 month ago

While I think they have an excellent case here I don't think the image on the right is a fair comparison photo. They should both be lined up in the same orientation without being handled.

[–] AA5B 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When my kid was little, he had some food allergies (thankfully he grew out of them). The last time I went to subway they refused to share allergy info AS MANDATED BY LAW. That was the last time I went

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›