this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
552 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19224 readers
3086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20 128 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wasn't one of his wives dying of cancer at the time he was cheating on her?

[–] dhork 87 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yup. According to Wikipedia:

According to L. H. Carter, Gingrich's campaign treasurer, Gingrich said of Jackie: "She's not young enough or pretty enough to be the wife of the President. And besides, she has cancer."[269][270] Newt has denied saying it.[266]

That was his first wife he cheated on. But his second wife got the same treatment:

Gingrich filed for divorce from Marianne in 1999, a few months after she had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.[280]

He met his current wife because she was a House staffer, and carried on another affair while impeaching Bill Clinton over... well. you know. That marriage has lasted 20+ years.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich

Isn't it always the case that the most vocal people about moral issues are also the ones with the longest "Personal Life" section on Wikipedia?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As a man that stuck with a partner after they got diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Fuck newt gingrich

[–] comador 68 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thats a name I could do without hearing ever again. One of the main proponents of the "my way or go fuck yourself" politics that we are now stuck with...

[–] CharlesDarwin 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, I had to laugh when a lot of future magabrainz, but who called themselves teabaggers at the time, were telling each other and anyone else that would listen that Obama was so "divisive". What they really meant was that Obama was a nKLANGer, as well as being uppity, oops, I mean, "arrogant", as they would update it.

Meanwhile, for anyone that cared to look would easily know that the two people most responsible for any division in the country were Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich. Newt actually had classes on sowing division.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

You missed the opportunity to call Obama a Clanker with your censorship. Roger-Roger.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

AT LEAST. He may have already cheated on his third wife and it simply hasn't been made public.

[–] ilinamorato 34 points 1 month ago

who has been caught cheating on 66% of his wives

FTFY.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

didn't he die already and why not

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hell: "We already took henry kissinger! Bitch, talk to heaven or keep him yourself! "

[–] mmcintyre 30 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't bet that he ain't cheated on all his wives.

[–] makyo 19 points 1 month ago

Thanks Newt, please do spread the message that women don’t need to vote like their husbands

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

66% that we know about.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reminder that newt ended Office of Technology Assessment if you ever wonder why a South African apartheid nepo baby has so much power in America newt is your answer.

[–] banshee 5 points 1 month ago

Whoa! Thank you for sharing - did not realize that

[–] peopleproblems 18 points 1 month ago

I'm with y'all, I'm more disappointed that he's still stealing oxygen. At least Rush and Kissinger had the decency to finally kick it before fascism became so goddamn close to reality

[–] CharlesDarwin 16 points 1 month ago

This really is highly triggering stuff for a certain kind of "man".

[–] Lost_My_Mind 10 points 1 month ago

I'm pooping right now, and straining. So I misread the headline as

Gingrich, who has cheated on all 66 of his wives, rails against Harris ad telling woman to ‘lie’ to husband

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Fuck you Newt.

[–] LEDZeppelin 9 points 1 month ago

That’s Rich coming from Ging

[–] idiomaddict 9 points 1 month ago

He went on to say that the modern Democratic party lacks the qualities of presidents it once housed, including former President Kennedy.

Speaking of infidelity…

[–] thesporkeffect 7 points 1 month ago

It's just crazy to me that he found at least 3 women interested in having sex with him. He has the sexual energy of a rotten pumpkin. Just completely unfuckable (but apparently not?)

[–] Snapz 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Relatively high percentage of those wives he cheated on were dying of cancer at the time as well, yes?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Coincidence? Or is the guy radioactive and toxic to be around?

[–] pyre 4 points 1 month ago

one cancer, one MS

[–] b3an 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe weak Republican men who control their wives lives SHOULD have their wives taking control of something that is their own. Like their bodies. Or their right to vote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

He knows what he's doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Weird that this is the counter-narrative out there instead of pointing out that the shitstains are fine with terrorizing their wives so that they’d NEED to lie

[–] AidsKitty 0 points 1 month ago

Yes the people they chose to marry.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 1 month ago

The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Hill:

Wiki: reliable - The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication's contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources.


MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4965914-newt-gingrich-slams-harris-ad/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support