this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
323 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

9923 readers
662 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

I'll just leave this here.

[–] AshMan85 19 points 9 hours ago

Break up big tech. Regulate monopolies before the cause the second great depression.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

That's right about when I would start slacking off real hard.

[–] randon31415 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Please leave! If we fire you, we have to pay unemployment, but your replacements will be younger (less costly health problems) and will accept less pay. It's win-win-win for us if you leave of your own accord!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

I know two senior programmers at Amazon who found new jobs rather than RTO. Within 24 hours after they left they got emails from recruitment identifying them as “boomerang candidates”, offered them a decent raise, and offered full time remote work.

This is nothing more than getting people to quit and hiring back key personnel lost in the process.

[–] Etterra 2 points 6 hours ago

Time to set up effigies on gibbets for totally peaceful protest purposes.

[–] olafurp 6 points 9 hours ago

I've heard that this is the new type of layoffs big tech is doing. Massive layoffs that are required lower the stock price but people quitting is not news. So the best strategy to get rid of staff is to create a hostile work environment temporarily until you reach the right amount.

This is a really bad idea for long term health of a company. The people that stay are the ones that will struggle to find new jobs and the people that leave probably already have another job at a competing firm lined up.

It's just straight up dumb but keeps the stock price high and the CEO gets his bonus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Well... uhhh... that was Amazon's plan. I thought we were on the same page.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Any manager high up enough to be talking on a news channel doesn’t have the degree of interaction with workers to know what they think.

Source: every job I’ve ever had

[–] model_tar_gz 5 points 7 hours ago

As if they care what the plebes think.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They will do whatever they can get away with.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Melian Dialogue: "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must"

this is why collective action with 21st century employment is important. all of them could sit down. but they won't because of humans constantly failing the prisoner's dilemma.

[–] DerArzt 33 points 19 hours ago

This was always the intention.

[–] EnderMB 41 points 20 hours ago (12 children)

As an Amazon employee...the man blatantly lied about the figures for those happy to RTO. He probably got them by seeing that ~10% of corporate staff are in the remote advocacy channel, and assumed that everyone else was...happy?

Regardless, Amazon is known as a place that values data above anything else. If you are a fresh grad PM and you're caught fudging or misrepresenting numbers to suit a narrative, guess what happens to you. You are more than likely PIP'd or fired

I'd say that Matt Garman should be fired for lying about the data, but given that Jassy has a habit of lying about figures also, the rot is at the top.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh, permission to leave the plantation, thank you boss sir.

Same old slave owner personalities.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_plantation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 134 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Well yeah, driving people to quit to save money on severance from the impending layoffs is the whole point of forcing them to return to the office

[–] Valmond 36 points 23 hours ago

You don't like the anal probe? Just leave!!

(*without any additional pay or severance)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dkarma 4 points 15 hours ago

Paging Tyler durden on this mf

[–] MrFappy 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So in this instance would quiet quitting lead to the desired result? Just doing the most subpar work until they’re forced to fire you with a severance…

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Yes. Malicious compliance.

[–] NocturnalEngineer 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would continue to work from home until they fire me.

[–] Agent641 27 points 1 day ago

Would continue to sit in office applying for other jobs until they fire me.

[–] iAvicenna 27 points 1 day ago

amazon unhappy with happier employees can leave too

[–] Mango 15 points 23 hours ago (15 children)

Why is even the writer of the article lying about the reason? Everyone knows this is about real estate value propping up the stock price.

[–] Cryophilia 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why would Amazon give a shit if real estate values go down? Amazon isn't a real estate company.

[–] Mango 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Are you actually interested in the answer to that or just running in here to argue? I figure it'll save me effort if you tell me before I answer.

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Umm...good question. I think I came in here expecting to see some braindead takes and prepared to argue against them, but tell you what, I promise I'll be respectful and attentive in this thread. You sound like you might actually have a good answer to my question.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›