this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
224 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers
6350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SelfProgrammed 93 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

A grift in broad daylight.

The "requirements":

  • a Bible that is bound by leather or material like leather
  • has the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights
  • is the New King James version of the Old and New Testament
  • has no commentary
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

has the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights

Why does a bible need these things?

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because Trump's version has these things

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Conservatives want a collection of things they won't read or ban. This sums it up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They’re putting these in schools to try to tear down the separation of church and state.

It fits two purposes:

  • grift for Trump payments with state funds
  • keeping kids dumb so they stay republican later
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 5 points 1 month ago

If it doesn't contradict itself it's not Republican enough.

[–] LesserAbe 4 points 1 month ago

I'm in sales and have seen the strategy discussed where if you're trying to sell a product to an institution with a formal bidding process to coach your contact to draw up requirements which only your product can meet.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

I’d respect it more if it was just said right up front, “funding to the god-emperor by stealing from our children’s education.”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Is there a known beforehand contractor to provide these with a markup? I guess there's a shade of a simple local grift too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I guess the satanic temple could print an edition that matches those requirements and undercut Trump by like a dollar.

[–] AbidanYre 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Re-affirming its status as a shit-hole state.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Giving Idaho, Florida, and Texas a run for the money.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's nice to see Oklahoma has resolved all their school supply shortages and have excess funds available. Perhaps they should issue state rebates back to the taxpayers. Edit: spelling

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[Bring] the Bible in its essential historical and literary context to Oklahoma classrooms

I don’t know what America’s founding documents have to do with the context of ~300 AD (or whenever Christian texts were first organized into the New Testament). But I can’t think of many places whose founding would be more offensive to Jesus’s teachings than Oklahoma.

[–] InverseParallax 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The whole south would be about the biggest possible fuck you to Jesus.

And if he ever came back i doubt he'd live to see trial much less his legal execution.

Bet the televangelists who demanded his death would be so upset they'd need to buy new private jets to get over it

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The South is like 30% black — majority black where I live — and the black churches organize around civil rights and charity. Jamelle Bouie recently noted that his religion professor once said, “In the black church tradition, Christians worship a Jesus who has been lynched. In the white church tradition, Christians worship a Jesus who could be forgiven for lynching"

I’m personally secular but actually living in the South, it’s more complex than election maps make it seem. People doing work in Georgia against the odds flipped it blue.

[–] InverseParallax 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why on earth would he need to be forgiven? He was clearly doing his father's work: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_Ham

Grew up in the south, I just have 0 tolerance anymore, there is so much unabashed evil, we had black GIs come back from fighting to liberate concentration camps, only to be lynched at home.

My personal experience is that redemption of the south is no more possible than redeeming the nazi party, at least not without very hard and direct work like we needed to do during reconstruction.

In the meantime this corruption is spreading and destroying the rest of the country, the cancer is metastacizing and it's too late to amputate the limb.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First of all, I have no respect for fascists. Most of them are afraid to drive into a city. They clearly own guns for fear reasons. These men are Nihilists, Donnie, there’s nothing to worry about.

But second of all, the south is not monolithic. Atlanta, New Orleans, Memphis, Birmingham, Houston, etc. are not the same as the state governments that have disenfranchised people for more than a century. Most people aren’t scum.

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lived in half those cities, but the suburbs aren't hot either.

The minority who are scum make up for it with their energy.

[–] InverseParallax 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

And you know what? They literally founded the southern baptist convention because the national triennial convention wasn't pro-slavery or racist enough, they needed Christianity to be pro-slavery racist first and foremost because it was their only true core moral value, and I haven't seen that change one whit.

Hitler wrote explicitly about Jim Crow in the south as a model and inspiration for the genetic policies Germany needed.

We have been too gentle for too long, if the south had shown any interest or intention in seeking redemption that would be one thing, they constantly double down in their pride and arrogance and demand others respect their perversion.

It's gone too far. Georgia in 2020 was not something we can rely on to keep our secular democracy. If they had shown an ounce of contrition in 160 years, but they aren't capable of that because they're incapable of imagining ever being wrong about anything.

[–] QuiteQuickQum 3 points 1 month ago

Southerner here. It's this kind of carte blanche thinking that had left the liberals and progressives of the South fighting an uphill battle. When the major party most aligned with our values throws up their hands and withdraws all support, we are left only with our metropolitan counties trying to lead by example, however flawed we may be. I want to help my rural statesmen get the help they need so that they're above water long enough to realize the true opponent, the 1% aka the new age plantation owners. But when we only have 2-3 counties per state trying to stem the tide while weathering the onerous rulings of a gerrymandered state legislator, it's slow going. I almost left once, but that's accepting defeat. I'm not leaving this country if we take a significant rightward turn, because I'll lose any ability to right the ship. Same goes for the South.

From a Blueberry in a Raspberry pie, with love.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t live in the Bible Belt part and I agree with your views but there are more good people in the South than you’d think. It’s not like any party wins 99% to 1%. In New Orleans, I consider us more Caribbean than Southern. South Florida too. Everywhere is complex.

[–] InverseParallax 3 points 1 month ago

In the Midwest, there were also bad people.

But the good people ALWAYS stood up to them, or at least mostly didn't tolerate them.

The south tolerates scum in ways nowhere else really does that I've seen.

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll give you those points, and there were many good people in the south.

But the people who rule the south are so unimaginably corrupt and use the evil to cover it. They're using bigotry and hatred as a weapon for their economic purposes and that's a big problem.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And one day we’ll have democracy in the South. I have no intention of defending the South. But get you a copy of an old Green Book or ask black people about Boston. There are racists everywhere. There were sundown towns in Oregon. Idaho is still like 30% white supremacists. C’oeur D’alene harassed Utah’s women’s basketball team last year.

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lived in Boston for over a decade, married my wife there.

There are racists, but the difference between Boston, Indiana, and the south was that nobody would do anything because they knew the cops wouldn't help them (well, in Boston it was marginal in places).

The south, the sheriff would help cover anything up, you could just disappear or have an accident. No questions asked, it happened to people, everyone knew.

I doubt there will ever be democracy in the south, there is far too much pride, and I haven't seen it improve much in my lifetime.

The major difference now is that everybody knows how it is, whereas before people pretended it wasn't.

[–] Lauchs 22 points 1 month ago

I think it's some 3 million dollars they're going to spend on these? At least it's nice to know they will certainly be spending a similar amount on Qurans and whatnot /s

[–] just_another_person 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't there a zillion constitutional lawsuits pending on this? Even if they get the bullshit "state's rights" treatments, why isn't there a ballot vote on this yet?

[–] Viking_Hippie 0 points 1 month ago

Aren't there a zillion constitutional lawsuits pending on this?

That's probably what they're counting on: one of those lawsuits reaching an extremely fundamentalism-friendly SCOTUS that is then likely to throw away the establishment clause or at least bypass it with impressive-sounding nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Speedrun to antichrist status

[–] LesserAbe 10 points 1 month ago

Total bullshit in multiple dimensions and it should never even be considered. That said, as a former bible student turned atheist, if they're going to have bibles in school a good option would be NRSV, or the funny option would be The Cotton Patch bible.

[–] danc4498 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don’t worry, kids will make sure these bibles are not colored in and trashed in a variety of ways.

[–] alquicksilver 3 points 1 month ago

Oooh, I hadn't considered that. There will be so many dick drawings in there by the end of the first year.

[–] Zexks 1 points 1 month ago

I would hope but OK is still pretty religious.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Trump's qualify because they are naked political graft and not a religious document?

[–] ObsidianZed 4 points 1 month ago

I'd be curious to learn how much of this was specifically planned which was the reason Trump included the state documents in his version.