this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
296 points (96.0% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14322 readers
87 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SacralPlexus 176 points 2 months ago (13 children)

A lot of his value is tied up in assets that aren’t liquid (real estate). Also he is probably not worth as much as he says.

But the main reason is that these “cheap crap” things you mention are probably vehicles for money laundering from foreign actors. The best example are the NFTs he was hawking for awhile. Costs next to nothing to make and foreign states can buy a ton of them to give him money without it being easy to detect. Even if it is detected it is still legal to buy silly NFTs, right? Certainly more so than a foreign government giving a candidate bags of cash for nothing.

[–] mkwt 24 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Foreign nationals, let alone foreign governments, are not allowed to give money to political campaigns in the United States. Actually illegal. Bill Clinton got in trouble for it

If you can prove that an NFT scheme was foreign campaign money laundering in court, people can go to jail.

[–] SacralPlexus 116 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For sure. But of course dude tried a coup on live tv and we are having trouble getting the justice system to hold him to account. So getting proof of the NFT scheme that I outlined as a hypothetical is probably going to be harder.

[–] PunnyName 29 points 2 months ago

Partially because the coup is coming from inside the house. Representatives, senators, and SCOTUS seats already planted.

[–] Windex007 18 points 2 months ago
[–] TheGiantKorean 12 points 2 months ago

How does one go about proving that money laundering occurred? Genuinely curious because I know it's illegal. I guess you'd need to catch someone admitting that they did it?

[–] Burn_The_Right 9 points 2 months ago

It's not campaign money. It's the "honest fruits of labor" that he "earned" by selling products. Even though every normal person can see that he's a fucking grifter, maga morons can't. So, now he has plausible deniability for any money "earned" in this "honest day's work".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snausagesinablanket 8 points 2 months ago

I see his wife has a Xmas collection for sale including NFT's.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because he's not actually a billionaire.

Lists of rich people like Forbes primarily use number approved by the individuals through various means. We know for a fact thanks to the recent fraud case in NY that the Trump Org regularly inflated nearly every number about their business, especially real estate. They regularly inflated the value of property for things like loans and underestimated the value for taxes.

Trump is well known for requesting people not question his finances in collaborative events like his Comedy Central roast where he can control it.

People with actual money doesn't care about that. And that's just the tip of the monetary iceberg. We've learned a lot since Trump decided to run for President the first time. It was probably the worst thing he could have done to keep his grifts running smoothly.

[–] snausagesinablanket 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Was he ever a billionaire?

[–] halcyoncmdr 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure he was at one point, then as he began losing money on terrible ideas, because he's an idiot, he started lashing out into any random crap he could to try and stabilize it. Taking out dozens of foreign loans with inflated numbers, and constantly ending up underwater in those, needing more to further the process, like a debt-based ponzi scheme where no one actually makes any money in the end, not even the banks.

He managed to bankrupt a casino. They basically print money, yet he managed to run one right out of business.

[–] Death_Equity 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He lost the casino because he wasn't willing to play ball with the family. He thought he could be a big shot and say what happens and found out you don't try and cut in on the business of the family without giving tribute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Now now, he's not lying lying, he's just really into "alternative appraisal and accounting methods". Kinda like that aunt who does her own research and swears by essential oils and homeopathy, but with money.

Let me give you an example. Let's say that I have a truck load of coarse sand, like 25 tons. I manage to sell a single 10mg grain of sand for 1 USD. By appraising my sand based fortune on this single data point, I could claim that a gram is worth 100 USD, thus I have 2.5 billion USD tied up in sand. We both know that I obviously can't liquidate my sand for that amount, but that doesn't matter, because all I need is to convince a bank that my appraisal is sound and then use the sand as collateral for a 100 million USD loan. Some of that loan I'll further invest in the sand business, after all it's booming. More sand equals more collateral, and seeing as one bank was satisfied with my collateral, then I will be able to get other banks in on it too. And now I can live like a billionaire, all because I have invested in coarse sand. And if the banks figure out that I'm full of it, then what are they going to do? Take me to court and look like idiots for buying into my sand appraisal? And risk bankruptcy as it's revealed that the collateral the bank has for its lending business is worthless? Better to keep quiet and prop up the sand mogul.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the man made all of his money through debt maxing and then defaulting, dude is a conman, nothing else to it.

That and the apprentice, those are the only way he has ever gotten money.

[–] Valmond 8 points 2 months ago
[–] Buddahriffic 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Didn't that "buy real estate for cheap above buildings so they'd have to buy it back to expand upwards" scheme also make some money? He needed some way to gain credit in the first place that wouldn't just disappear when he started defaulting on everything.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

he also got 400 million from his dad, and then also managed a block of racially segregated apartments with his dad as well, so.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The better question the media should really be asking him every single chance they get - when they aren't continuing to grill him about Laura Loomer - is, "if the economy is so bad under Biden/Harris and your supporters are living paycheck to paycheck, why do you think there is a market for $100,000 watches?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The media that he pays to provide him endless PR?

Do you really expect regime whores to do journalism?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

The media don't work for him. He works for the media. The media work for the billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

One thing that people didn't mention yet: this is the behavior that made him (stay) a billionaire. You don't get to be one by being nice and non-exploitative.

[–] Bytemeister 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Rule number one of being rich; don't spend your own money.

[–] Johnmannesca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is rule number two to never let them see you broke?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edgemaster72 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He's a narcissistic grifter. He gets satisfaction from making money and a feeling of superiority for screwing people over in the process. No amount of money will ever be enough to fill the void of his missing humanity.

[–] snausagesinablanket 4 points 2 months ago

I concur. Having a gold plated toilet speaks for itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He has to create opportunity for foreign actors to funnel money to him.

It's not illegal to sell a $1,000 watch for $100,000. That way he doesn't have to actually launder the money.

[–] snausagesinablanket 6 points 2 months ago

I have 4 unrelated email addresses on 4 separate domains and I get solicited for Trump Wine at least once a month on all of them. His spam game is on point.

[–] Holyginz 19 points 2 months ago

He's never been a billionaire lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wealth isn't the same as money in bank. Most of Trump's wealth is tied into properties. You can't pay for groceries with a skyscraper. That's why many wealthy people borrow money for everyday spending rather that liquidate (sell) their assets. This applies to pretty much every wealthy person. When someone is a billionaire it doesn't mean they're hoarding billions of cash in bank.

[–] shalafi 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they're hoarding billions of cash in bank

Lemmy's understanding of wealth right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeitstop 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Trump has a lot of wealth on paper, but a lot of it is tied up in real estate, which isn't the easiest thing to turn into cash when you need it. And a lot is tied up in stock, but since he got caught fixing the books for the Trump Organization, he can't really use that as his personal piggybank without a lot of scrutiny. And Truth Social is worth over a billion on paper but will crash if he starts to sell any of his stock, which would cause a lot of new problems right now.

Meanwhile, he is burning through money at an insane rate. I mean historically, he's lost far more money than he's ever been worth. He's always had to have new businesses and schemes to cycle through as the old ones crumble. He basically never made a profit until the Apprentice, and that actually caused problems because he'd structured his operations around losing money, leaving other people holding the bag when things go completely south, writing off the loses for tax purposes, and, well, cooking the books.

But with hundreds of millions in judgements against him, on top of the hundred million plus in legal fees, he's in a bit of a bind. He already had to put a $175 million up for bond to appeal the judgment civil judgment against the Trump Organization. If he loses the appeal, he's out not just the $175 million, but the full $489 million judgement, plus about $115k a day in interest. Plus he's got the E Jean Carroll judgments and ongoing cases because he's a dumb bastard that can't stop himself from committing defamation every time he leaves a courthouse after losing a defamation case.

While he has been funneling money from his PAC to cover his legal bills that only goes so far, and as I understand it, he can't use that for actual judgements against him. If he loses the election, he may be fighting legal battles for years to come, that PAC money will likely dry up, and if he doesn't have the cash when the court demands it, he could see his assets seized and auctioned off. If he wins the election, he can do basically anything and we're all fucked.

So to simplify this a bit, imagine that he spent almost all his money on a lot of properties without getting a single monopoly, while his opponent has hotels on the dark blue and green properties. He keeps trying to survive the gauntlet and pass go to stay in the game, and maybe he can survive by mortgaging everything, but it's much easier for him if he has the cash to pay the bill.

[–] Phegan 16 points 2 months ago

He's a grifter no matter how much money he does or doesn't have.

Also, the debate shouldn't be if trump is or isn't a billionaire. It's if billionaires should even exist.

They shouldn't.

[–] Sam_Bass 9 points 2 months ago

billionaire once, grifter since

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

grifters gotta grift

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

That's his schtick, he's actually just a billionaire cosplayer

[–] Dkarma 8 points 2 months ago

He's a liar.

[–] LEDZeppelin 5 points 2 months ago

“Supposed to be” - this is why

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Umm... Isn't that what Amazon does at a global scale?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›