this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
200 points (97.6% liked)

Psychology

387 readers
1 users here now

Come talk about psychology and related disciplines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohwhatfollyisman 71 points 2 months ago (2 children)

didn't tobacco companies once refute a causal connection between smoking and lung cancer?

what else is he going to say? that he knows he's profiting from pouring poisonous sludge into all our lives?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And, even though Big Tobacco was obviously lying, they sewed enough doubt to keep the topic as an issue of debate for decades after we knew it was dangerous.

Zuck is likely doing the same because it works.

[–] BeMoreCareful 4 points 2 months ago

Oil companies too. Honestly, the tobacco industries bullshit is pretty foundational to any communications studies.

It's something we should all keep in mind when whenever we are subject to corporate communications/public relations.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes 3 points 2 months ago

Worse. They had these big, decades-long gaslighting campaigns, selling cigarettes as "good for you" because they "calm" you down, make you look cool and lower your blood pressure, etc.

[–] MagnyusG 70 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Even if he was right, his word can't be taken seriously because of his position. He's never going to admit his product is actually detrimental.

[–] whotookkarl 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tobacco exec: it's not cancerous

Oil exec: lead additives are safe

Social media exec: no harm to your kids psychology

[–] nolannice 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sonic Team exec: we won't make you a furry

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Shit, what did I miss?

[–] arockinyourshoe 39 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

ditching facebook sure improved my mental health. wasting time is one thing, but wasting it on infuriating bullshit is just fucking stupid

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FBM is the only reason it’s still alive.

[–] TexasDrunk 2 points 2 months ago

And events. I use it to follow a bunch of places that have musical events or drinking contests. But I don't have a single friend, and I only check it once a week or so to see what's coming up.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Mark Zuckerberg is the stereotypical CEO: lying, ignorant, and indifferent about the wellbeing of humans, as long as it generates profits.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper 18 points 2 months ago

Lol everyone knows there is, even the kids

[–] De_Narm 17 points 2 months ago

"Wolf says there's 'no causal connection' between him being there and a declining sheep population."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~Mark Zuckerberg~~ The Tobacco Industry says there’s ‘no causal connection’ between ~~social media~~ Smoking and teen ~~mental~~ respiratory health.

There...fixed it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Best joke of the day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I've read dozens upon dozens of claims that social media was harmful, and always dismissed them as Karen nonsense, "think of the children" bullshit, or "kids these days" boomer ignorance.

Today, for the first time, I have started to believe there might actually be some truth to the idea.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah because it's more than a casual connection

[–] JigglySackles 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Causal, not casual. Same sentiment though, there is a proven link and of course he doesn't think that's a problem because he sells the problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I had to see the person correcting you to realise myself.

[–] Valmond 2 points 2 months ago

That got a laugh out of me so well done for that misstske, casual connection 😁!

[–] AtomicHotSauce 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The collapse of society and its ensuing extermination of his kind is gonna be cool.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I would love to believe that, but instead I can't help but believe a collapse of society would just put these people in an even higher level of control. They have the most starting resources, so they'll have an advantage starting over, and with no rules or restrictions, it will be bad for everyone else.

[–] uebquauntbez 6 points 2 months ago

He is the right one who ought to tell us! /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Emotionless Android in human skin cites results of programming sub-routine to conclude state of human mental wellbeing.

[–] Feathercrown 5 points 2 months ago

Torment Nexus creator claims the Torment Nexus is not dangerous

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True. There's a pretty direct connection.

[–] pixxelkick 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That would be what causal means mate.

[–] dustyData 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the oil industry said to the world for decades that pollution wouldn't cause climate change. Yet here we are.

[–] rageagainstmachines 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's right, there's no "casual" connection. In fact, it's a definite connection.

[–] CrayonRosary 4 points 2 months ago