this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
452 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19122 readers
2641 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We have definitely been transported to an alternate universe

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 196 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Really wild to see MTG appear to be on the correct side twice in a week. I wonder what the goal of the party is aside from distancing themselves from a losing candidate.

[–] JesusSon 170 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

I think she woke up and realized a government shutdown right before an election caused by ineffectual republican leadership might hurt them in the down-ballot. Or we woke up Sunday on the next timeline because the earth exploded, and everyone died Saturday night. It's been a crazy week and it's only Tuesday.

Edit: looks like a shutdown before the election due to ineffectual republican leadership is back on the menu boys.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I mean yeah that's sound political strategy, but you're telling me MTG woke up and possessed the self reflection necessary to realize that?

I think it's more believable that we all died.

[–] JesusSon 19 points 2 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] StrongHorseWeakNeigh 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think this is absolutely the correct interpretation of this. Shutting down the government because repubs don't want to play ball weeks before an election is only likely to hurt their chances.

[–] Brunbrun6766 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but they do this every election year, and their supporters never care

[–] chronicledmonocle 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't until their social security checks stop flowing.

[–] negativenull 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ultranaut 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly it. Shutdowns are not popular, if they shutdown the gov before the election it is going to cost them significant votes. They are already worried about the impact of Trump on down ballot candidates, a shutdown will almost certainly cost them seats. This is MTG expressing her panic because she realizes how stupid the GOP is behaving with an election about to happen.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What surprises me the most is that out of all the Republicans, it's her that realizes how stupid this is.

[–] billiam0202 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Of course she does.

She's terrified that if the Dems take the House back, she'll lose her committee seats again. Like all small-government advocates, she wants power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Or she's jealous that someone else is fucking Trump so she's causing problems.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SassyRamen 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Putin said he wants Harris to win, she took that literally 😂

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

haha. beautiful

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

She might've been hit by a stray neutrino or something? Flipped a random bit?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

LOL how many bits is MTGOS anyway...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is she trying to distance herself from the maga side of the party after seeing the polls predicting a big defeat this election?

Very strange to see.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My spitball theory is that she sees this new Loomer person coming to eat her lunch as token crazy maga lady, so she's trying to get off her sinking ship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Priority #1 is always to remain elected so that you can stay "on the take".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] themeatbridge 94 points 2 months ago (2 children)

MTG hasn't suddenly grown a ethocortical gland. She's getting polling numbers that scare her, and she wants to win reelection. Georgia is turning purple for a variety of reasons, and a government shut down would be bad for her campaign.

[–] TrueStoryBob 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen polling specifically for her district but, while Georgia is very purple (and has been since like 2014), her district is gerrymandered to hell and back to not be anything other than red. I think I saw that it's one of the deepest red districts in the country.

[–] themeatbridge 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Deep red refers to voter registrations. It's generally a very good indicator which was they will go, but this election is anything but politics as usual.

I'm not privy to her internal polling, but I'll bet she saw numbers than people in her district are concerned about Trump, see a lack of leadership in the GOP, and are considering staying home rather than show up for her. Angry people show up to vote, and if enough people say they are going to vote Trump out, then she doesn't want to be on his boat when it happens.

Another possibility is that she's testing the waters for a Senate or Governor run in 2026. She doesn't need to move towards the center if she can bash people to her right. It makes her look reasonable and conciliatory without actually being either one.

Either way, she's not doing this because of principles. She's doing it for personal benefit, because she's a conservative.

[–] grue 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but, as a Georgian, I'm pretty sure she has a 0% chance of either losing her district or getting elected to statewide office, no matter what she does.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ccunning 68 points 2 months ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That was a great explanation.

I remember hearing an interview with John Boehner on NPR (former Republican Speaker of the House) a few years ago. He was talking about the government shutdown that happened shortly after far right wing was elected in 2010. Apparently, a few of them barged into his office after the shutdown and demanded to know why the government had actually shut down.

And Boehner was like, "Um...you said you wanted it to?"

And the right wingers said, "Well we didn't think it would work!"

These are irresponsible people who think they should just get to play games in life.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

And the right wingers said, "Well we didn't think it would work!"

I recall a number of voters who voted in favor of Brexit who were interviewed and said things like "but I didn't think it would actually happen!"

I also seem to recall a similar sentiment in a case where people voted to strip funding from a local library in Michigan, then were shocked when the library had to close.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow. He really nailed it in a very simple way. Nice job.

[–] ccunning 37 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Jeff Jackson is amazing. He’s not my representative, but he’s running for state wide office(Attorney General, N.C.) this year. Don’t be surprised if you see more of him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She's seeing the potential writing on the wall and is attempting to come across as moderate all of a sudden so that when the Republican party purge of MAGA begins, she can hopefully be overlooked by it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Her voter base of Joe Rednecks don't have a passport, and stopped paying attention to the wherabouts of their birth certificate once it got them their first gun.

Voter suppression suddenly doesn't feel so good, when it puts your seat on the line...

[–] AdamEatsAss 24 points 2 months ago

Honestly this might not even be that far off. I could see a lot of people opposing requiring presenting documents to vote because they don't want the government to be able to track them.

[–] Professorozone 11 points 2 months ago

Ah, that explains her sudden interest, however fleeting, in sanity.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pretty hopeful news actually.

MTG is among the most seemingly dedicated to being a horrible, bigoted piece of shit, and yet even she is recognizing that a platform of being a horrible, bigoted piece of shit is no longer serving her.

Fuck her forever. But I'll take this specific brand of opportunism as a positive sign.

[–] barsquid 16 points 2 months ago

No it is happening because it is close to the election. Would be fucking wild to yet again convincingly prove they are incapable of governance while just weeks away. Even this hollering gibbon can see that. Any other time she would be doing the usual racist MAGA bullshit and refusing to cooperate.

[–] AstridWipenaugh 11 points 2 months ago

This is the difference between a normal racist and a high functioning racist that knows a failed state can't effectively oppress the people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seems like we've reached the point where most voters realize that virtually all government shutdowns have been the Republicans' fault.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

It’s probably because preceding each shutdown they loudly proclaim that they will shut down the government and blame the dems… and then they do…

[–] eran_morad 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] comador 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She's up for reelection? That's the only way I can see her actually going counter to her bullshit antics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The GOP has used the threat of a government shutdown many times to hold this country hostage. And when it comes to remembering who's at fault for it, most of the U.S. electorate has the memory of a crack-addled ferret. But if you have a government shutdown THIS close to an election, some of them just might remember who caused it.

[–] Chocrates 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Uh has anyone done a brain slug check recently?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InverseParallax 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ATDA 14 points 2 months ago

Either there's writing on a wall or she got hit by a brontosaurus bone and thinks she's a functioning Congressional member...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian 12 points 2 months ago

Never give them what they want in exchange for them doing the bare minimum. The Dems just need to send flyers to government workers whose representatives got them furloughed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

This headline is easy to read wrong -- my brain grouped the subject of this headline the other way at first. I read, "Marjorie rages at (Mike and calls to fund government)" rather than "Marjorie (rages at Mike) and (calls to fund government)."

load more comments
view more: next ›