this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
20 points (67.2% liked)

politics

19073 readers
6280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, given his problem with Harris is that she supports abortion rights, he can just get fucked along with his opinions.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

About the only "evil" I see in her is the pussyfooting with Netanyahu. Dude is straight up a war criminal.

[–] distantsounds 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

She did say Israel will still be fully supported, which isn’t really just pussyfooting with a war criminal…it’s more enabling. I would also add fracking to the “evil” side as well. Don’t get me wrong, it is better than the alternative and the lesser of two evils, but still.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Regarding the fracking issue, what was she supposed to do there? Hillary Clinton said she was going to shut down coal mining and it was a major contributor to losing her the election as a whole. We didn't need a repeat of that.

[–] distantsounds 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tout creating clean energy jobs and training for them. We are continuing to repeat this and pass this transition off. Not addressing climate change will not gain a young voters. HRC was terribly unpopular to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think Harris could have had a more nuanced answer than, "Fracking, fuck yeah!" But it's a damn shame that, to win the electoral college you have to be all drill, baby drill.

Although that's politics... "It's great to be here in Chicken Fark, Arkansas! I know, in the past, I have been accused by my opponent of being opposed to chicken farking. But I'm here today to tell you that, if elected, I promise to fark more chickens than any president in history!"

Still voting for Harris, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think she panicked a little bit. She was asked the question, and thought, "Oh shit, this is what fucked Clinton," and didn't want to leave any doubt in WV residents' minds that she was going to take their jobs away, so she gave a clear, no-bullshit answer.

Obviously yes, it would be preferable that the overwhelming opposition to fracking from most of the rest of the country was enough to offset one very small, backwards state's fears, but that's not the country we live in right now. Maybe in the future.

[–] FlowVoid 3 points 1 month ago

Tout creating clean energy jobs and training for them

In other words, do what HRC did.

"We are going to train you for different jobs" does not inspire as much optimism as you seem to think.

[–] Myxomatosis 38 points 1 month ago

Why don’t you clean up your own house before criticizing others? Start with the pedo priests that the church likes to hide.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't put much stock in the opinion of someone who actively protects and supports child abusers as to what he considers "against life"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Things the Pope and David Miscavige have in common for 1000.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 4 points 1 month ago

If the Pope murders his wife they'll have two things in common.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Nobody asked you. Keep your creepy diddling religion out of our politics. Or start paying taxes.

[–] aseriesoftubes 30 points 1 month ago

“bOtH sIdEs!” - The leader of a religion that has a well-documented, 1000-year history of sexual abuse, torture, turning a blind eye to genocide, and actually committing genocide.

[–] givesomefucks 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So Catholics lose tax exempt...

Right?

This is the literal head of their religion getting involved

[–] jordanlund 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

He's not actually picking a side:

“One must choose the lesser of two evils. Who is the lesser of two evils? That lady or that gentleman? I don’t know,” Francis said during a press conference on the papal plane, referring to Harris and Trump. “Everyone with a conscience should think on this and do it.”

He's equating Trump's anti-immigration policy with Harris' pro-choice policy.

He's completely ignoring everything else about Trump.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

He sounds like Glenn Beck. "Who's worse - Trump or Harris? I don't know. I'm just asking questions..."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

C'mon, I mean Harris isn't perfect but the other guy has done a lot, lot, lot worse...

Ignoring the seriousness of Covid? Think how many died needlessly because of that. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trumps-policy-failures-have-exacted-a-heavy-toll-on-public-health1/

Even ignoring covid, how many died under his health policy (or lack thereof)? Possibly over 25k: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/quantifying-health-coverage-losses-under-trump/

Heck, technically he's not even anti-abortion! https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trumps-abortion-stances-republicans-2024-gop-rcna147222

For anyone who is "pro-life" in terms of all human beings being and staying alive, I should think that backing Harris should be a no-brainer.

[–] leadore 16 points 1 month ago

Let me just fix that headline: "Head of insanely wealthy organization that has sexually abused children for hundreds of years feels justified in calling someone evil."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Shut up, Frank.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Your opinion is noted.

drops note in trash

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey buddy, we all know how broken our political system is... at least this time we can get a little bit excited about one of the options. There have been worse elections.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Tell it to go away

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Why does the tribunally selected autocrat of a foreign nation intent on raping children get to tell me anything about democracy or evil?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Lesser evil pot, meet lesser evil kettle.

[–] JeeBaiChow 3 points 1 month ago

Well, as far as republicans go, they see one insurrectionist rapist convicted felon, and one liberal. Apparently the liberal is worse. They're just stupid at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Fuck off and shut up Papist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

HEY! Watch the disrespect! If there is one thing Catholics know it is being EVIL so maybe the Dope knows something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You knew about l'abbé Pierre, fucker. Know when to shut your trap and when to open it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not gonna lie. The bar is so incredibly low that, at the risk of invoking dril, at least Child Fucker In Chief acknowledges those are some pretty evil beliefs about immigrants.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Anyone else ever get the feeling Francis is just a bit dumb?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 1 month ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/09/13/politics/pope-francis-trump-harris-abortion/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support