this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
331 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19099 readers
3529 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks 82 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They're all melting down...

MTG called Laura Loomer racist and demanded she take a tweet down because "president trump doesn't support racism".

They literally don't know what to do and all it took was putting a regular human barely under retirement age next to trump and her just existing.

[–] meco03211 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But she existed menacingly!

[–] JeeBaiChow 2 points 2 months ago

And approached him uncomfortably right from the start!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The scary thing is that, despite not knowing what to do, they still have a realistic chance of winning. Which is causing me to melt down...

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Genuinely surprised and disheartened to learn that Karl Rove is still alive.

[–] pyre 2 points 2 months ago

turns out turd blossom is younger than the orange turd

[–] ultranaut 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I never imagined I would agree with Turd Blossom about something but Trump has made it happen. We really are through the looking glass!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Like the Lincoln Project said, who'd have thought it was actually Donald Trump who brought us all together?

[–] Tylerdurdon 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that's pretty damning. I'm no "Hot Karl" Rove fan, but he was the preeminent Neocon strategist, and no dummy. For him to slam the orange one like that...

[–] jordanlund 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In the Wall Street Journal of all places...

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly pretty tired of the people who helped create a world that would lead to this decrying the world they created.

Nah, fuck him to next Sunday. He is saying it because its politically expedient for him. He can still eat shit. Jon Stewart has it right. They can all fuck right the fuck off.

The people behind attitudes like this are not to be trusted. When they show you who they are, believe them the first time.

The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...] 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.

That's commonly attributed to Rove and he is describing the firehose of falsehoods.

[–] randon31415 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Trump said Harris stole his philosophy and political leanings ... then one sentence later called her a Marxist.

So what does that make him then?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago

A fucking idiot.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker 5 points 2 months ago

I really wish she called him out on that. "Which is, Donald? Am I stealing your philosophy or am I Marxist?"

But ABC just moves on to another question before she can respond.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Karl Rove is a RINO" incoming...

[–] kescusay 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If they try to RINO Turd Blossom himself, there won't be enough popcorn in the world for the party fracturing that would represent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

OK well now I support that kind of fracking.

[–] vegeta 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The dog ate his prepared notes

[–] PP_BOY_ 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember, Republicans were bragging about Trump not preparing for the debate

[–] DocMcStuffin 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The dog ate his concept of prepared notes.

[–] kescusay 15 points 2 months ago

The dog ate his concept of a plan to have prepared notes.

And then JD Vance ate the dog.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And then RFK found the dog on the side of the road and ate it.

[–] SGG 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

An immigrant ate the dog who ate my book report! Trump always reminds me of a kid in front of his class trying to wing it.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 2 points 2 months ago

I bet a Haitian could get those back for him.../s

[–] Today 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] JeeBaiChow 1 points 2 months ago

He didn't win. He's avoiding another round because he got his ass beaten so bad he doesn't want it to happen again. Please america, make it happen it again in November.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

If he's lost the Holden Bloodfeast demographic he's finished.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well well well how the turntables

[–] JeeBaiChow 2 points 2 months ago

That's pretty much accurate lol.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 2 months ago

Santa Barbara Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Santa Barbara Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-harris-debate-karl-rove-verdict-b2611340.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support