this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
383 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2822 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 3 months ago (1 children)

DOT’s rule also puts an end to airline runarounds by requiring refunds to be automatic, prompt, in the original form of payment, and for the full amount paid.

This is perfect. I just had to chase a few travel companies for refunds they owed me. The cancellations were the fault of the companies, not mine.

Every single one of them requires you to call some hidden phone number who tells you to download an app, and part of your refund is always disputed. It literally takes hours just to figure out how to complain.

They take your money in 5 seconds, but give it back in "5 to 7 business days".

[–] robojeb 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They take your money in 5 seconds, but give it back in "5 to 7 business days".

This is the thing that pisses me off most. After spending hours arguing when they finally relent it will be "up to 30 business days before you see your refund". I had one company take 120 days to refund my money when my venue had to be cancelled during COVID, money that I had to pay the moment I booked.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

At that point you have to complain about it to your credit card provider. They are literally taking your money. 30 days is not acceptable, let alone 120 days.

I complain once to the merchant and if the money isn't going to be refunded soon, I call the credit card company. Try not to threaten or call again. Literally just escalate at the sign of problems.

[–] AA5B 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

During COViD, I had flights cancelled on me. It was a discount carrier that first claimed “no refunds”. When I called and pointed out COViD regulations requiring it, they relented and gave me a credit for their shitty airline, expiring in a year. However after two years, I did get an actual refund … never again flying JetBlue

[–] Landless2029 87 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  • Ensuring accountability for companies that provide bad service. People shopping for products or services should be able to rely on customer reviews to assess which companies will provide streamlined service and not waste their time. The FTC has proposed a rule that, if finalized as proposed, would stop marketers from using illicit review and endorsement practices such as using fake reviews, suppressing honest negative reviews, and paying for positive reviews, which deceive consumers looking for real feedback on a product or service and undercut honest businesses.

Wait. No more fake reviews? No more supressing honest negative reviews?

I'll believe it when I see it. Let's see how Amazon/Google/Yelp handle this.

Let the lobbying commence!

[–] rigatti 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How in the world would they enforce this?

[–] almar_quigley 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That is what someone who is taking advantage of that system would ask.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 months ago (25 children)

One thing I'd like to improve the clarity on or outright declare/enforce: put a limit on the wait time allowed. Fixing chat bots, and website directions is one thing, but still being put on hold for 2 hours because the company doesn't pay for sufficient phone staff is BS.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin 66 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How about automation of filing taxes. Such a scam.

[–] NinjaTeensy 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

New direct file from the IRS is a good step forward. It is very simple but not everyone is eligible yet iirc.

[–] Landless2029 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Its so simple I'm disqualified from using it because I have a HSA.

Now pass federal universal healthcare and that'll go away so we have no issues.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is that because they don't have the info from the HSA?

I thought the point of systems like this is that they prepopulate everything they know, and then you fill in the rest?

That way it's quicker, and you dont accidentally miss something they know about and get in trouble with the IRS wasting everyone's time?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Feathercrown 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't they just open it up to everyone? I thought that was one of the Biden admin's recent wins

[–] NinjaTeensy 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's opened to all states (was certain states before) but not everyone qualifies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

A new Internet provider came to town and we jumped from Comcast. Waited up to two hours multiple times trying to get through to someone to cancel the account, and couldn't. So we just let them turn our service off. We don't have any of their hardware so there are no continuing charges. It'll be easier and less costly, considering the value of our time, to pay the collection agency.

That is fucked up. That's some bullshit I'd love to see fixed.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I have good news for you. You can just tell your credit card provider that you tried to cancel, but couldn't. They will just cancel it for you. It's a bit of a strong-arm tactic, but it works.

Whenever you need to cancel a gym, try this. They tell you that you need to come in? Nope, not acceptable or legal.

[–] Agent641 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Getting banned from the gym is easier than cancelling.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Become ungovernable.

Shit on the bench press.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's the real reason every gym has a naked old guy hanging out in the locker room with his nuts out. At some point, every man will spend decades of his life trying to cancel his gym membership - and having failed all his life, will find himself having become a desperate old man, left with no choice but to flaunt his wrinkly nutsack in the locker room in hopes of them finally kicking him out, thus freeing him from his eternal struggle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah I think we did ETF or something. I've been out of work for 5 months. Now let me tell you about trying to close an empty bank account so they will stop paying people and charging you fees...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Closing a bank account is as easy as legally possible. They are already highly regulated, and there's a lot of paperwork to protect you from having your account closed without your permission. You can literally go into a bank if you want help. That's not the same thing as a gym at all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't actually walk in. There's no local branches for this particular place. But even if I could, they can't close it while transactions are pending. And if new transactions hit, the account goes negative and then you can't close it until you bring it back positive.

I understand there are fraud concerns on both sides of that coin. But it isn't easy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

don't rely on that. I had a medical vendor charge the wrong amount (pre claim) and refuse to reverse the charge and my credit card company (well ex credit card company) refused to as well. because some sort of charge was legit they did not see the wrong amount as any issue.

[–] barsquid 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah turns out wrong amount is somehow not fraud so the credit card doesn't need to help with it. You have to battle it out in civil court instead. Enraging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Doesn’t work with Comcast ….. when I moved into my current house, I got a fantastic fiber provider that hooked me up on move-in day! However apparently the previous owners had Comcast and Comcast kept trying to collect despite me saying I have never had an account with them. 2-3 months later, they came and cut my fiber from my actual provider. Bastards wouldn’t even let me complain because now they realized I’m not a customer

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They cut someone else's fiber? That seems like a trespass or destruction of property, but probably not your property.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsquid 7 points 3 months ago

There need to be serious consequences for something like that and there just aren't.

[–] Fedizen 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Called up my health insurance the other day and they transferred me 3 times. It should not be this difficult.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we do something about the math test/Star Chamber hybrid we all have to fill out every April?

The IRS knows what we owe already. Send a bill or a check. If there's a dispute, then there should be paperwork.

[–] ganksy 32 points 3 months ago

Finally! Those republicans have been a nuisance for far too long.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

this is exactly the way. So much fighting over big issues but hey there is a lot of small stuff making life miserable and stifling progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank god, we need so much of this.

I've been chasing my bank around for almost two months now to get a problem fixed. They have obviously invested the least amount of money possible in customer service to the point where they can barely answer the most basic questions. The only progress I have seen on this problem is due to the fact that I finally figured out the right question to ask.

It is infuriating that they provide this level of support when it's obvious it isn't saving me any money - it's all just going to the C-suite and investors.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

that right question to ask thing really speaks to me. I have found across the board that places do not have employees that know the business and expect you to. What they really expect is that the software they bought will allow them to hire people that don't know what they are doing for less and the software will do the work. they want the mcdonalds registers that use icons for a big mac or such. its so not working.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Go after ISPs. We really need transparency on where they directed government grant money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] something_random_tho 12 points 3 months ago

are calling on [insert link to letter] health insurance companies

Someone needs to proofread these things.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 11 points 3 months ago

Go after introductory pricing. It's a bait and switch in my opinion and it's probably also a regressive policy too. Switching providers does get you better deals but if you can't pay early termination or installation fees you're stuck.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

This is something I can get behind!

load more comments
view more: next ›