this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1222 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5305 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 217 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's like when Sideshow Bob was running for Mayor and used ads denouncing Mayor Quimby for letting crooks like Sideshow Bob out of jail.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vance isn’t nearly as intelligent as Bob. But I did laugh at the comparison.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Vance is a Yale grad and a best selling author. It's a good example of imposter syndrome; he's better than Trump in any possible way, but lacks the intestinal fortitude to be anything but a lickspittle.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

A lot of the GOP leadership is not stupid. Some of them are very intelligent.They're just self-serving and morally bankrupt.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hillbilly Elegy was a NY Times bestseller.

You can hate on the guy, but facts are facts.

[–] maniclucky 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Except that list gets manipulated all the time. It's a known practice to order shit tons of your own book, get on the list for a week, and hand them out (or resell them) later.

[–] Windex007 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ok, I accept that, but it inevitably leads to the next question of "what metric would you accept to call oneself a bestselling authour?"

[–] maniclucky 19 points 1 month ago

By definition, bestselling is what it is. The question is "does bestselling mean they're a good author?" And that's what we have reviews for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Probably something better than "it sold more than 1000 copies in a week". Especially when the author can indirectly buy all those copies with not that much money, just to claim the best selling title

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] barsquid 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It just means it sold a number of copies, there is zero judgement on the content. Sometimes a campaign will launder money directly to a candidate by purchasing many copies of that candidate's book to give away. It is somehow legal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheBat 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hillbilly Elegy was a NY Times bestseller.

Which book isn't?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eatthecake 4 points 1 month ago

TBH, I think a lickspittle probably needs quite a bit of intestinal fortitude

[–] [email protected] 157 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"That's different! They're white!" -his inner monologue

[–] Sterile_Technique 40 points 1 month ago

He immediately whataboutism'd BLM protests, so... yeah it was outer monologue too.

[–] RedditWanderer 104 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that hypocrisy doesn't burn them. Logic doesn't matter.

You'll find conservative women against abortion who had an abortion, because "for them it was different".

You'll find them yapping about taxes and "big crime families" but when trump does it "he's just smart and using the system like everyone else".

You'll find them fed up with "giving away free stuff", when they all do sovcit shit and dodge taxes because "fuck biden or wtv".

They have upper class money, but for them it's different, "they aren't rich" and "daddy technically didn't even help".

Theyre all losers who think all their problems are caused by other people.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You'll find conservative women against abortion who had an abortion, because "for them it was different".

My favorite article was about some privileged women who were shocked when they found out that when abortion becomes illegal, they can't have abortions anymore.

Because for them, they were called "terminations". I couldn't make this up.

And then they had the gall to proclaim that they would have been the ideal people to show the importance of the matter. Of course, a matter is unimportant until it affects you, the privileged one.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/us/abortion-women-tfmr.html

Zero empathy or reflection. Kind of impressive.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

You gotta be pretty incompetent to walk directly into that. Even if you're not sure where the interviewer is going, if you ever hear the phrase "so you agree that..." you cannot agree with whatever they're saying because that phrase indicates that you're walking into a logic trap.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

so you agree that...

Giant flashing "it's a trap" sign.

Ficking idiot walks straight into it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Yeah but they get away with it because their audience only cares/is fed the stuff they agree with

Trump said the government should be allowed to take people's guns without due process (just breaking two constitutional amendments, NBD) and Republicans just had to wait a couple days and their voters forgot about it

[–] barsquid 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a trap either way. Like asking Matt Gaetz if he agrees children should not be trafficked and raped by middle-aged adults. Any direct answer to that would make him look like a pedophile.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's why you aren't a politician (along with probably many other reasons). The correct response is something like: "there are certain actions that these protesters shouldn't be taking." You just totally avoid the question and pretend like you answered it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Logic traps only work on hypocrites though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsquid 74 points 1 month ago

Pleasantly surprising to actually press even that hard during an interview. Interviews should be forcing candidates to explain themselves.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we get the actual clip?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (4 children)

CNN Post with video. Quote starts at 1:07 mark

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've never heard this guy talk so hearing his voice...

I mean, I'm not saying that I've ever talked to a couch fucker but....yeah, the voice sort of says couch fucker.

[–] macarthur_park 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s a reason that rumor spread so effectively

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The author of the tweet never even tried to claim it was true, either. When the couch thing blew up, they even specifically said that it was just a joke. You’re exactly right, though. There’s just something about Vance that makes it seem believable.

[–] Serinus 17 points 1 month ago

Well, if you've read any of his Hillbilly Elegy, it fits. He does this weird oscillation where he talks about his humble roots, and then is incredibly condescending towards anyone in a similar situation.

Apparently he's better than that now.

He could talk about how he was so desperate he fucked his couch. But then, once he had money, he was able to attract an actual woman. He still occasionally fucks a couch, just for nostalgia, but all those other people who are still fucking couches are sad and gross.

It would blend right in.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lets call it what it is. He fucks underage couches. That makes him a rapist. He's a couch rapist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He read of therapist couches and messed up the spaces in the words

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair 3 points 1 month ago

Is he an analrapist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems 6 points 1 month ago

Age of consent or not, I've never heard a couch talk, let alone consent.

It doesn't matter the type of material or the designer brand the couch is either, the couch isn't "dressed like it's asking for it." Unless it's enthusiastic affirmation, it's rape.

[–] MrVilliam 5 points 1 month ago

I've never asked so I can't say for sure that it's not impossible, but I've personally never heard a couch speak. Therefore, I'm not sure any couch is capable of consent. Ergo, all couch fucking is couch rape.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Vance's eyes look like the soul has vacated his body long ago

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

"well, you know... That happened three, ehh four years ago!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The little couch fucking shit weasel. He had an answer and it wasn’t half bad. Then he redirected to his false equivalency bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the worst part, I agree with his point that we shouldn't have blanket prosecutions...just like we shouldn't have blanket pardons.

I think a good followup would have been "Do you believe it is also possible there are BLM protestors who likewise had the book thrown at them?" Bring it back to the question of why they think their "protest" is more acceptable than the BLM protests.

But it's weird, that didn't feel like a modern Republican interview exchange to me. Yeah he's doing the soundbites but he's actually responding with...logic rather than feelings? Or at least as close to logic as a Republican candidate can get these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrewth09 36 points 1 month ago

The interview equivalent of stepping on a rake.

[–] zaft 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the fuck is with the eyeliner lol

[–] RegalPotoo 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All forms of gender-affirming care are valid and should be respected

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I respect Robert Smith wearing eyeliner. This bigoted fucker can eat shit, I'll criticize his eyeliner because it's a sign of his deep hypocrisy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm all for gay people and would never bring extra attention to them, but if I see a closeted homosexual republican doing gay shit imma give em hell cause of the double standards.

[–] Etterra 9 points 1 month ago

Is that crickets I hear? Heh wimp womb Vancey Pants.

load more comments
view more: next ›