this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024

260 points (96.4% liked)

News

23424 readers

5201 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

260

Conservationists Say 'Bizarre' Dead Bear Incident Proves 'Terrible' Judgment of RFK Jr. (www.commondreams.org)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/news

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 79 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you haven’t read about it, do yourself a favor. I ignored it for quite a while because I don’t care, but that was a serious mistake. The whole account is wonderful.

The other thing I took away from it is that the NYPD homicide detectives (who, for some reason, were involved) sure know their stuff. They sorted out that it was hit by a car, died somewhere else (like pretty far away), and then someone moved it to Central Park. To me that was impressive.

Also, RFK Jr wants everyone to know that he was NOT drinking. Everyone else involved was drunk as shit. But not him, because he wouldn’t do that; that would clearly be a bad decision when you’re dropping a dead bear cub in a staged bicycle accident in Central Park.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Which is worse, doing stupid shit drunk, or being stone cold sober and thinking this was a good idea?

[–] ArbiterXero 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right???

Like I’d judge him if he was drunk still, because that shows spectacularly bad judgement.

But doing it sober makes it seem premeditated?

[–] SidewaysHighways 6 points 3 months ago

Sounds like something a person close to me with mental illness would do

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I think it's more a matter of drunk driving being an obvious criminal offence, while dumping a bear carcass in a park might be more in a grey zone-ish?

[–] dogslayeggs 43 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I'm less concerned about dumping the dead bear in Central Park than I am with the decision making to even have a dead bear to dump.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)

His friend hit it with her car, and he decided he wanted to take the body home and cut it up for meat.

The decision to get out of your car and start fuckin' with the dead bear cub's body, just assuming that it has no family in the area, seems to me like honestly the most serious mistake of the entire bad idea adventure.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay but to me that falls apart when it’s followed up with ‘oh I have a flight to catch I better just dump it in central fucking park’

If you knew there were plans you can’t miss, you definitely don’t have time to dress and butcher a bear.

Guy’s friends we’re all drunk but he super defininitely wasn’t? Was one of the drunk friends driving?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are we sure his "friend" isn't just him?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

His worm friend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Possibly getting brain worms might be the worst part.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Im flabbergasted about needing to put a bicycle next to it for some reason. They added that to their "plan".

These people were also full grown 60 year old adults.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 3 months ago

Bicycles: notorious bear killers.

[–] chiliedogg 8 points 3 months ago

The whole thing is a remarkable string of bad decisions. I'm a little impressed.

[–] TheLowestStone 5 points 3 months ago

One of his hobbies when he was younger was hanging out with his hawk (who may or may not have been trained to kill cops) next to a pit full of rotting cow carcasses. It blows my mind that anyone would consider someone this unhinged a viable candidate for president.

[–] RattlerSix 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I thought that said conservatives and was surprised they actually care about a person's judgement

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Wow thank you. That's what I read it as too, and I was thinking oh this is where they draw the line with this wacko?

[–] Ab_intra 3 points 3 months ago

Hint: they only do if it gives them the upper hand..

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It was the brain worms directing him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Possibly how he got the brain worms, to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I heard the worm was killed and removed. Seems to have left some spectacular damage though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

This happened like 10 years ago, so the worms were just digging in back then perhaps.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Lying liar tells the truth about something and it’s even worse for him. Fuck this piece of shit.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Jeez, is he using orange pancake makeup too? FFS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It is depressingly effective if you've got that pallid veiny translucent thing old white people get.

[–] Ab_intra 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think I saw Biden using it as well 🫣

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Lies!

Wait, really? Where??

[–] FuglyDuck 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Any one who goes on under television studio lights will be wearing pancake makeup.

Otherwise you look incredibly pale and freakish. Trump being orange has more to do with horrible make up (and possibly interactions with bronzer)

Yes. This includes your favorite beefcake action hero.

[–] Furbag 1 points 3 months ago

Trump wears an excessive amount of bronzer. Not always, but when he plans to make public appearances he does for sure. There are a few photos out there, usually of him at his golf resorts where he thinks he's safe from the paparazzi and they snap some candid shots of his pale, pallid looking skin, unkempt hair, and even eczema sores. Dude is super vain about it, but honestly, the mock-ups of him without all the work required to keep his signature look - the hair plugs, the bronzer, the TV makeup, etc. actually make him look more like his age and a bit more relatable from a... I dunno, human perspective?

[–] Ab_intra 3 points 3 months ago

Haha. It was from an interview. Also I don't say it to spread lies.. I liked the guy. I'm not a Trump sucker.

[–] Ab_intra 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's from the interview with George Stephanopoulos: https://youtu.be/0kpibhlagG0?si=Qqh0ina5bTIoPcXC

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mmm I dunno, that looks like regular “tv interview” makeup. There’s three problems with it:

it matches the color of his hands
there’s no ridiculous “raccoon eyes” or clown-face border
he’s not in public screaming about immigrants poisoning the blood of the nation

Although admittedly that last one may be subjective

[–] Ab_intra 2 points 3 months ago

🤣

[–] cowfodder 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The 4 part series that Behind the Bastards just did on him is fascinating. What a strange dude!

[–] Ab_intra 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Indeed. Like thinking that the government is planting data chips in vaccines..

[–] njm1314 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Say there are some things conservatives in the rest of us can agree on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The headline doesn't say conservatives.
I thought it did too.

[–] AncientFutureNow 2 points 3 months ago

And they are not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

that was the giveaway, huh? Not... you know, everything else that's come out of his mouth?

load more comments