this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1312 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5714 readers
3899 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 124 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Pretty sure they will find a way to look good on paper while still doing more harm than good

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 months ago

"In order to adequately test our new carbon capture system, obviously, we had to dump a couple trillion more tons of carbon into the atmosphere. Which, yeah, granted, does make it all that much more upsetting that the system didn't actually work."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They'll all buy credits, problem solved!

[–] thesporkeffect 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we rebrand normal taxation as Non Fungible Energy Credits??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

"We changed the legal definition of carbon and have saved the planet"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

They already do! It's called carbon credits

[–] Agent641 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They will probably overdo it, probably with iron fertilisation of the ocean, and start a fucking ice age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bet they're too dumb and poor to even know how to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Only people with really big penises and lots of money know how to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Oh, well...

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 24 points 3 months ago

They can't even remove micro plastics from the environment and even my peasant testicles can do that

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (13 children)

Step 1 - Take carbon from atmosphere

Step 2 - Compress carbon into diamonds

Step 3 - ???

Step 4 - Profit!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Swap steps 1 and 3.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

They'd still do more harm

[–] beebarfbadger 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They still haven't decided the pissing match over who can profit the most off pumping the atmosphere full of CO2.

[–] BeMoreCareful 4 points 3 months ago

They will urinate us to the stone age.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Reading the word 'billionaires' and then 'removing ... from our atmosphere', my brain wasn't computing.

'Billionaires removing oxygen to sell back to us' would make sense.

[–] FlyingSquid 10 points 3 months ago

Removing oxygen from billionaires isn't the worst idea either. Maybe by sending them down to the Titanic or off to Mars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That's a doctor who episode

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Gotta sneak it in the side... let's try "who can build the largest/most diamonds from atmospheric carbon".

[–] Cryophilia 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] dejected_warp_core 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a start. Honestly, industrial grade diamonds - the small ones with poor optical quality that go into abrasives, saws - would be even better. And that would side-step the elephant in the room: upsetting the DeBeers diamond cartel.

That said, we need a staggering amount of renewable energy to pull this off, but it's doable. And as far as sequestration goes, the only tech we have that's anywhere near as good is turning CO2 into plastic and permanently burying it in landfills. That's how important this is.

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 3 months ago

I think biochar production is pretty effective and scalable. Check this company out: https://bioforcetech.com/

[–] NewAgeOldPerson 3 points 3 months ago

Oh. It's a thing. I thought it was an onion type site for a few moments.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, because someone would remove all the carbon and all the plants world die.

[–] iAvicenna 3 points 3 months ago

imagine atmospheric carbon becoming a delicacy. fuck....

[–] Diplomjodler3 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But then the line might go up more slowly for a while! Everything must be sacrificed to the line!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe it’ll be a new “line go up” metric and replace the existing line with a better one..?

Wishful thinking, I know.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is only one chance to end world hunger, as soon as its solved nobody else can do it! Imagine the prestige!

[–] hswolf 3 points 3 months ago

Sadly, even that wouldn't work, they would just start sabotaging each other and no one would accomplish it, and once again the suffering would fall on the impoverished

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

We already could end world hunger if we stopped feeding so much of our crops to other animals https://awellfedworld.org/issues/hunger/feed-vs-food

[–] masquenox 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, it wouldn't.

They'd come up with dodgy and dangerous schemes that would probably just cause more damage. And that would just be before they found a way to monetize it all...

Does the liberals on here not have the foggiest clue how capitalism works?

[–] BluesF 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely! Look at what happened to Mr I Want To Go See The Titanic Personally. That was with his own life on the line! Not to mention his teenage son! Please god don't trust the rest of our fucking lives to these maniacs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They'd do what they do with green washing currently; measure what they took out, but not how much the put in doing it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dexa_scantron 8 points 3 months ago

Neal Stephenson wrote a great novel about this. Check out Termination Shock.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I'd rather see a posting match over who can pay the most taxes.

[–] pivot_root 7 points 3 months ago

Elon, probably: "You're all trying to undo your carbon emissions while I'm making electric cars to lower my carbon footprint. If it's not clear who’s the winner, it's because you're too focused on being a pedo."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

They'd find a way to fuck it up

[–] profdc9 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 14 points 3 months ago

Depending on where you live, that may be the best option.

[–] Anticorp 4 points 3 months ago

No help. Only hurt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

That's just going to take resources away from other things. Such as keeping fossil fuel plants open as clean power gets diverted to carbon removal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Make it the new currency.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

They are now confused. How will that increase their meaningless high score number?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

New contest! See which billionair can remove the most billionaires from the earth. Last one standing gets to live. Ok, well maybe at least a movie.

[–] Reverendender 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They came up with a device to do this at scale, however it IS powered by orphan blood.

[–] Agent641 2 points 3 months ago

If only there was an easy way to mass produce orphans!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›