this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
416 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 138 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If auditing millionaires generated a billion dollars, then it stands that auditing billionaires should generate a trillion dollars! /s

Only a little sarcastic, we should audit the shit out of them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 53 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Wogi 6 points 4 months ago

Move to enforce collections with implements including but not limited to torches and pitchforks.

[–] teodor_from_achewood 41 points 4 months ago

Thanks Joe Brandon

[–] AA5B 40 points 4 months ago

Clearly a waste of money harassing upstanding innovators and job creators. IRS needs to stop wasting money and agent’s time on harassment like this. Defund the IRS.

/s in case it’s not obvious

[–] MegaUltraChicken 16 points 4 months ago

We could probably double that haul with an audit of a couple SCOTUS justices...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

This was the low hanging fruit. The good stuff takes a little more work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I wonder how many were close to $1 mm and how many were closer or > $1 Bn?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Biden administration’s yearlong effort to crack down on delinquent rich taxpayers has yielded $1 billion, a milestone that the Treasury Department said on Thursday was the result of beefed-up enforcement by the Internal Revenue Service.

The Biden administration, which initially signed a law giving $80 billion to the agency, continues to contend with attempts by Republicans in Congress to claw back more of the money.

“Efforts to increase tax fairness and bring in revenue from high-end taxpayers who have not paid what they owe are already paying off to the American people,” Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said during a briefing with reporters.

commissioner, said that because of the agency’s larger enforcement staff, it has been able to focus on tracking down and sending letters to wealthy taxpayers who owe money.

And it has been ramping up audits of hedge funds and real estate investment partnerships and cracking down on abuse of corporate jets for personal travel.

had been too slow to resolve identify theft cases and that it was not doing a good enough job answering the phones when taxpayers called with questions.


The original article contains 453 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] veganpizza69 1 points 4 months ago
[–] anticolonialist -3 points 4 months ago

MIC seeing this as a bonus