this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
349 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2459 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 154 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (13 children)

Those that make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable. - John F Kennedy 1962

I do hope no violence happens in Texas, I really do.

Though anyone who has picked up a history book knows how this ends. And usually forced to sit as a bystander as it happens.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Yeah the problem is that the other side says the exact thing, with the difference that they aren't oppressed, they simply lost the "right" to oppress others

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Americans are at war with their history books

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is how we descend into vigilantism - when the justice system is fundamentally unjust people need to seek their justice elsewhere.

This isn't an endorsement of vigilantism either - it's fucking horrible and can be used against justice just as easily for justice.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

This is the true price we pay for our sham supreme court. It’s a strong indicator to all that justice is not done. It encourages dangerous vigilantism and violence because as you write, where will it come from then? How are the wronged to be made whole?

This is seriously dangerous territory and I’m quite concerned for where we are headed.

[–] grue 5 points 6 months ago

How's that saying go again — "The only way to stop a bad vigilante with a gun is with a good vigilante with a gun?"

[–] Sanctus 85 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Texas is undemocratic. If you can't protest you have no power as people

[–] anticolonialist 18 points 6 months ago

That's not specific to Texas, protesters are always silenced by the state when they are deemed a threat to the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Can't have a government without people to govern.

[–] Nobody 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s even worse than it seems, because the killer can pull a Kyle Rittenhouse and go on the MAGA speaking circuit and get rich.

They’re not just incentivizing killers. They’re going to make them the MAGA version of rich and famous.

[–] FenrirIII 22 points 6 months ago

The family of the person he killed need to file civil charges. Sue this asshole into destitution

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 13 points 6 months ago

How long til the killer is running for office somewhere?

[–] Blaster_M 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

...so they're encouraging the escalation of peaceful protests into actual riots... in Texas... where at least half of the pop is armed... sure, that'll go well.

[–] grue 18 points 6 months ago

Gov. Abbott is definitely teaching the lesson that anyone who tries to drive into protestors should immediately be shot and killed, because all attempting to deescalate does is get more protestors murdered with no recourse.

[–] anticolonialist 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

People need to protest using all rights afforded to them by the Constitution. The right to free speech, which they use, the right to protest, which they do, and the right to carry arms, which they need to do.

People need to address the state in the only language it knows.

[–] grue 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

and the right to carry arms, which they need to do.

The victim was doing exactly that (he was open-carrying an AK-47), which is the pretext the murderer used to falsely claim "stand your ground."

In retrospect, the tactically correct thing to do would've been for Foster to have preemptively shot Perry through the car window, citing the same "stand your ground" defense (with infinitely more legitimacy, since Perry had just been trying to run over protestors).

[–] RGB3x3 15 points 6 months ago

People need to address the state in the only language it knows.

All the state knows is obstruction and violence. So that's what they should get and deserve.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm declaring open season on Greg Abboott. Someone please let a bear into his home while he's at work.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Someone please let a bear into his home while he’s at work.

Wish granted… a large, hairy man now waits in his bed.

[–] Got_Bent 3 points 6 months ago

For Greg Abbott that might be equally terrifying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

All right, you surpassed my expectations. Well done.

[–] aodhsishaj 5 points 6 months ago

What's this all aboot?

[–] Snapz 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] jeffw 6 points 6 months ago

Freedom to hunt down anyone left of the GOP!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But look at these shiny guns, now THAT'S freedom

[–] BigPotato 2 points 6 months ago

Or, scary!, depending on who's holding it. Guns are either a god given right or the devil's playing depending on the presumed political leaning of those holding them.

[–] Coach 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Maybe asshole Abbott will find himself in the middle of one of these violent protests.

[–] billiam0202 18 points 6 months ago

Abbott would never go to a protest because he doesn't stand for anything.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

May his ass holes ever increase in number

[–] MehBlah 12 points 6 months ago

First time a protester kills one of these murderous maga fools they will do a speed run getting them to execution.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

The Deregulated Texas Oblast is turning into f'n Muscoviteville.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Remember: If you see someone with a gun, shoot on sight. It's your constitutional right to use guns to defend yourself against people with guns.

[–] PunnyName 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This sounds like protestation, therefore it's open season on Piss Baby.

Peaceful protesting only works for so long.

[–] njm1314 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Peaceful protest accomplishing anything is basically a myth anyway.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Yes, and you can tell how ineffectual it is with how much effort they are going through to stop it!

[–] Everythingispenguins 4 points 6 months ago

Are they going to offer out-of-state permits? /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't fundamentalist protestants "protesters" before?

[–] TheRealKuni 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but 1517 isn’t exactly recent memory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Apparently they already forgot what it means...

[–] Sam_Bass 1 points 6 months ago

Feeling is mutual

load more comments
view more: next ›