this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
933 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2671 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday night spoke on the floor of the U.S. Senate:

And let me also mention something that I found rather extraordinary and outrageous. And that is just a few days ago Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the right-wing extremist government in Israel, a government which contains out-and-out anti-Palestinian racists.

Netanyahu issued a statement in which he equated criticism of his government’s illegal and immoral war against the Palestinian people with antisemitism. In other words, if you are protesting, or disagree, with what Netanyahu and his extremist government are doing in Gaza, you are an antisemite.

That is an outrageous statement from a leader who is clearly trying – and I have to tell you, he seems to be succeeding with the American media — trying to deflect attention away from the horrific policies that he is pursuing that created an unprecedented humanitarian disaster.

So, let me be as clear as I can be: It is not antisemitic or pro-Hamas to point out that in almost seven months Netanyahu’s extremist government has killed 34,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 77,000 – seventy percent of whom are women and children.

It is not antisemitic to point out that Netanyahu’s government’s bombing has completely destroyed more than 221,000 housing units in Gaza, leaving more than one million people homeless – almost half the population. No, Mr. Netanyahu it is not antisemitic to point out what you have done in terms of the destruction of housing in Gaza.

It is not antisemitic to realize that his government has annihilated Gaza’s health care system, knocking 26 hospitals out of service and killing more than 400 health care workers. At a time when 77,000 people have been wounded and desperately need medical care, Netanyahu has systematically destroyed the health care system in Gaza.

It is not antisemitic to condemn his government’s destruction of all of Gaza’s 12 universities and 56 of its schools, with hundreds more damaged, leaving 625,000 children in Gaza have no opportunity for an education. It is not antisemitic to make that point.

It is not antisemitic to note that Netanyahu’s government has obliterated Gaza’s civilian infrastructure – there is virtually no electricity in Gaza right now, virtually no clean water in Gaza right now, and sewage is seeping out onto the streets.

It is not antisemitic to make that point.

President, it is not antisemitic to agree with virtually every humanitarian organization that functions in the Gaza area in saying that his government, in violation of American law, has unreasonably blocked humanitarian aid coming into Gaza.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy 124 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sanders is the only G in the house.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Akshually, he’s in the Senate, not the House

But yes, I concur.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

I think OP means it more as “in da houzz.”

[–] ABCDE 25 points 7 months ago

No, he is in the upper house. So akshually yourself.

[–] Gingerlegs 110 points 7 months ago (14 children)

Only sane person in government and they won’t let us vote for him.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The rich have far too much to lose.

[–] Daft_ish 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The rich have far too much

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

actually it appears as though the House voted today to change the definition of anti-semitism to include criticism of the state of Israel, so in fact it now is anti-semitic to point out those things.

source: https://lemm.ee/post/30979131

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago

The House is free to define pi as 3, that doesn’t mean it is.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

[The bill] requires the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism when enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws

This is what the bill actually does. I don't like it, but there's no reason to mischaracterize it

[–] hark 23 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Let's check out this "working definition" shall we?: https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

These can be stretched to call any criticism of israel "antisemitic", especially given what israel is doing now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] alilbee 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is getting really irritating today. This and the Boeing whistleblower death. People seem to think that just because they're on the right side of an issue, they can just make shit up or not do their due diligence in looking into things. Thanks for correcting it.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

And if you had done your due diligence by actually looking it up, you would see that it does exactly what they say, and has been heavily criticized for it since at least 2005.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Papergeist 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Its still not anti-semetic to criticize Netanyahu. Just because it's a law, doesn't make it right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's not a law that you can't criticize Netanyahu...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ultragigagigantic 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They've passed their bill... now let's see them enforce it.

Wouldn't be surprised if they go all on on it. Its not just mask off these days... it's underpants off as well.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Great man theory in action. It’s not Netanyahu. He’s a symptom of the wider bigotry in Israeli society. Read South Africa’s complaint to the ICJ. Many, many, many members of their government are in full support of this genocide. Even the citizenry majority support the “war”, they’re just mad the hostages haven’t been returned yet.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

More people should see this. Common and casual dehumanization of Palestinians, of racism. Everyone else, America, the West are useful idiots. The hypocrisy of liberal democracies is surely on display to millions globally. They not only condone and give cover, but provide weapons and try to silence anyone for calling them out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Israel is the most racist society on this planet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Without some sort of degree in world geopolitics on your end I would say this inflammatory statement is hard to believe. It might be easier to say that Israel is the most racist society within the top 30. Even then, there are some countries in the top 30 where I personally have no clue how racist they are; but at least it's closer to the truth.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That old man sounds like a real antisemite \s

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People can be hateful of their own race or culture. Not saying Bernie is, but it's far from an impossibility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chemical 39 points 7 months ago

Need more representatives like Bernie

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Meanwhile NJ might divest from a Japanese company for having cut ties with an Israeli defense contractor over the war on Gaza. We're in bizarro world folks. I pledge allegiance to the United States of Israel, else be labeled anti-semitic? Not to mention Palestinians are semitic.

[–] fluxion 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Always on point. I wonder what things would be like if we were wrapping up our second term with this man as President

[–] AngryCommieKender 14 points 7 months ago

Boeing would have assassinated him already

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Everything he (and other like-minded politicians) says makes so much sense, and often seems obvious to me. It's really depressing that a huge part of the people see him as a threat. We have the same problem in France, and in most countries I assume...

[–] TropicalDingdong 14 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Consider running Bernie. Biden's not gonna win with the stances he's taken.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Bernie is great... but that's not how FPtP voting works, and I don't think Bernie would even consider running unless Biden dropped out and endorsed him.

Bernie didn't even run in the primary, probably because it doesn't make sense to run against an incumbent.

[–] ABCDE 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Bernie didn’t even run in the primary

Who did?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Let me have the unfortunate privilege of introducing you to Terrisa Bukovinac, a forced birth democrat who is essentially running a single issue campaign. Her website is full of shock stories and hypocrisy. Would not recommend.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Basically no real possible candidate ran against Biden in the primary because the Democratic party feels like supporting the incumbent is better for the party then trying to run against them. The incumbent president has a high chance of winning a reelection, historically speaking. Notably, trump is the last President to lose his presidential reelection campaign, before him its been like 20+ years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

The video is honestly pretty good as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9-EKi8lD_E

load more comments
view more: next ›