Habahnow

amazing. Thanks evan. Can't believe how happy I am with this simple change

Yeah this seems like BS and a waste of funds. We don't have enough housing for them so they're just going to move around somewhere else.

I don't think most ever said only Joe could win. I, and others, believed that Joe had the best chance at winning. It's looking like we were wrong, which I'm happy with. Even if the very recent polling (showing her up 2 points on Trump, compared to Biden), and the large donation day hadn't happened or Kamala looked worse, I would still be happy Biden dropped out if only because once Nancy and other top democrats started to challenge Biden. its not a good look to have an incumbent being challenged in that way.

I feel like Russians posting that this is obviously false, implies to me this is actually correct.

Maybe they watched it for the original Klingons? (Brown face)

So we agree the man with 10 v8 engine cars should move to EVs or public transit rather than having 10 cars? Because he's saying fuck that.

oof, it looks like you calculated 132k with a 60 hour work week. I guess that's not exactly the worst, but at 40 hour work weeks you're making 88,400 USD. I think that's still not too bad but it definitely changes the math quite a bit. if you're living almost anywhere in the world except for the top 10 countries in income, 88,400 USD per year is pretty good.

bro, getting tickled for an hour is very uncomfortable. Maybe If I get shot in the chest, my options next time will be I live a long life without a shot to the chest?

Lol nah, just Russian bots acting like Americans. "Biden is too old, we need anybody else in order to beat Trump!", "Kamala is too black/isn't manly enough/isn't black enough/is too womanly to beat Trump!"

Or maybe they'll push the angle that " was pushed down our throats by the political elite so vote third party/Trump to teach them a lesson!"

Appreciate the context!

I'm not certain where it gets that 2500 blocks per hour which make it difficult to interpret (does that already assume getting supplies?) and it become more inefficient because I believe cave exploring is more efficient than straight mining for Diamond. Regardless, 132,000 is not bad actually.

Since I see this as, whether getting 100k now (taking into account 10% interest rate on that money per year, and the fact you can work a job) vs 132k per year in mining diamonds, I made the following table: It basically shows that if your goal is to make more money within 15 years, then the question becomes, do you make over 100k per year? If you do not, then within 15 years making diamond mining your job makes a lot of sense. Bonus, you will never be out of a job or get fired. If you can make over 100k a year or you want to make more money sooner (want to retire soon) then it starts to make more sense to just take the 100k

Dems didn't control both the house and the senate soo... Thats why Dems haven't been able to pass as many things as they would like.