this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
214 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Speculation has risen as to why Donald Trump has not risked violating his gag order to attack former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker following his damning testimony in the hush money trial.

Pecker, the former head of America Media, which owns the tabloid, was the first witness to take the stand in New York in the former president's falsifying business records trial,during which he discussed setting up an arrangement to help stop negative stories about Trump from coming out ahead of the 2016 election.

While under oath, Pecker said he had concerns about the legality of performing a so-called "catch and kill" by paying Playboymodel Karen McDougal $180,000 to keep a story about an alleged affair between her and the former president from coming out ahead of the 2016 election.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No shit that guy has the receipts

[–] baldingpudenda 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He's been falling asleep except for when pecker is testifying. The reporters have said his demeanor completely changed. Went from just sitting there to leaning forward or folding his arms.

I wonder if you look back at photos of him doing that, if he's being told shit he doesn't like.

[–] CharlesDarwin 16 points 7 months ago

Maybe he's trying to keep from filling his diaper, too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

That's a pretty common body posture tell.

[–] JesusSon 67 points 7 months ago (4 children)

So, would it would be safe to say Donald Trump loves Pecker?

[–] MajesticSloth 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people are saying it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Tremendous people. Much bigly. ...hamberder.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I guess we know which Pecker is bigger.

[–] MehBlah 7 points 7 months ago

I've heard he has a preference for putins pecker.

[–] Pretzilla 4 points 7 months ago

Big pecker, strong pecker, tears in his eyes

[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He still has a lot more dirt on Trump.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

Trump apparently told people in the White House that Pecker knew more than anyone in the room. Pecker said that was a joke, but we all know Trump doesn't joke.

[–] baru 6 points 7 months ago

I saw a video where they described what was said in the trial. Apparently they sometimes buy stories just to have something to use as pressure on people. I'm pretty sure that you're right, Trump is quiet because he is forced to.

[–] NeptuneOrbit 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's been long alluded that he has a safe full of Trump dirt.

[–] tburkhol 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If the dude really has been "catch-and-kill"ing DJT stories since the 1980s, it's a damn big safe.

[–] FuglyDuck 1 points 7 months ago

Shouldn’t be too hard to get a warrant to search it. Or to find.

[–] CharlesDarwin 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would be great if there was some legal way to get Pecker to spill ALL the goods on donnie. Everything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So you're waiting with bated breath for the pecker to spill.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We want the pecker to ejaculate excitedly, and spill everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

That's a risky link, for sure!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

The DA figured it out: if you want to shut Trump up, just show him your Pecker.

[–] Diplomjodler3 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What the penis guy said is true and he can prove it. There's your answer.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The lies being provably false hasn't mattered in any other context. Pecker's got something on Trump not related to the case big enough to make Trump shut up.

Edit: subject verb agreement

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd bet anything that is the case.

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 7 months ago

I mean he killed all sorts of stories for him.

He knows where the bodies are buried.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

What did the penis guy say? Also, who's the penis guy?

[–] JeeBaiChow 10 points 7 months ago

Well I guess we know who holds the power in their relationship.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Speculation has risen as to why Donald Trump has not risked violating his gag order to attack former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker following his damning testimony in the hush money trial.

Pecker, the former head of America Media, which owns the tabloid, was the first witness to take the stand in New York in the former president's falsifying business records trial, during which he discussed setting up an arrangement to help stop negative stories about Trump from coming out ahead of the 2016 election.

While under oath, Pecker said he had concerns about the legality of performing a so-called "catch and kill" by paying Playboy model Karen McDougal $180,000 to keep a story about an alleged affair between her and the former president from coming out ahead of the 2016 election.

Prosecutors argue that Trump, Pecker, and Cohen "orchestrated a cover-up to interfere" with the 2016 presidential election by concealing negative information about the Republican from becoming public.

Speaking on the LegalAF podcast, trial lawyer Michael Popok noted that Trump has so far refused to make any damning statements about Pecker, despite frequently willing to risk a fine or even jail to violate his gag order to attack Cohen.

"Trump might say he was worried about Melania, but Pecker underscored the DA's charge that influencing voters was very much behind the whole catch-and-kill plot," Goldfeder told Newsweek.


The original article contains 656 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Sounds like Putin and Pecker have the same tape.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Its well known that trump is fond of peckers.

[–] Tronn4 0 points 7 months ago

A peck connoisseur