this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
550 points (96.5% liked)

Not The Onion

11020 readers
276 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The crying "History" button at the top right sends its regards. Yes, the World Jewish Congress has published a report that demands Wikipedia add a feature to view the history of articles, see what actions were performed by whom, and "host forums and discussions within the Wikipedia community to address concerns about neutrality and gather feedback for policy improvements". It also wants to force all admins and above to reveal their real names.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 238 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Have they never been on Wikipedia before. You can already see the edits and attribution. If their information is correct they should submit an edit and offer proof. Going to be hard for them to sweep the Palestinian genocide under the rug though.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Israel has a team of people influencing the image of their state positively throughout Wikipedia. Get fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 131 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Can you not literally see the edit history of Wikipedia articles?

[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Yes, that's why this is in c/nottheonion

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] fastandcurious 124 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Bias against Israel is similar to bias against racism/genocide, there is nothing bad about this at this fucking point

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don’t like any bias in my soup please

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

You're going to eat your bias and like it!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bias is not making judgements based on facts and history.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bias is being more likely to come to a particular conclusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango 103 points 3 months ago

Gee, I wonder what some murders want with the real names of people who they don't like.

Anyone curious why privacy is so important even if you've done nothing wrong?

[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 months ago

Fuck Israel.

[–] Harbinger01173430 77 points 3 months ago (5 children)

By the almighty god that lives in fantasy land known as heaven, can those genocidal monsters shut up already?

[–] Malfeasant 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like antisemitic hate speech...

[–] LordCrom 27 points 3 months ago

You'll need to publish your full name now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago (1 children)

this PDF will probably be referenced in the “genocide denial” article in the not-too-distant future

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

The present report does not seem intended to be an academic publication, although it has already been used as a citation in the article Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But primary research isn't allowed as a source on Wikipedia...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

(someone smarter than me correct me if im wrong but) in this case it’s considered a non-primary source since the article is citing what the WJC said about Wikipedia (their criticism), not the WJC’s original research on the subject.

disclaimer have edited wikipedia maybe once in my life, only a small clue what im talking about

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] aeronmelon 100 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Balanced and Zionist in nature."

He said the quiet part out loud.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago

Balanced and Zionist

"The pancakes should be tasty and composed primarily of vomit"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago

How about you go fuck yourself instead?

[–] foggy 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No red flags here at all.

All good. Make sure those dissenters get revealed.

I just -- wtf is wrong with the world rn...?

[–] Burn_The_Right 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

wtf is wrong with the world rn...?

Conservatives.

[–] Aceticon 31 points 3 months ago (7 children)
[–] raspberriesareyummy 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

these days, unfortunately... "They are the same picture"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This'll have to do as I don't know how to post images on this client.
🌎👨‍🚀🔫👩‍🚀

Conservatism has always been a thin veil to disguise greed. It's only about "maintaining the status quo" if the status quo gets you a lot of money already, otherwise it's about reducing privileges for your own benefit and to everyone else's detriment. All the while screaming "think of the children", as some sort of justification.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Paraponera_clavata 43 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Means it's probably infected with who knows what kind of zero days.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (9 children)

The zionist scum hate Wikipedia because its hard to call it antisemitic

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago

They can always fork it and see how it goes.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm sure Wikipedia are very concerned about this official PDF and they're going to implement the recommended changes immediately.

[–] masquenox 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just love the absolutely hysterical desperation in the hasbara's every attempt to try and rescue the contrived (and thoroughly undeserved) PR image Israel once had thanks to Western media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

challenges to Wikipedia's ideals include "The Power of the Admins and Beurocrats" [sic], as well as the gender gap

I wonder what would happen if you graphed the share of biographies by birth year. It'd probably increase over time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The Israelis failed to learn the lessons from WW II, because their playbook is from the NKVD and SS. Make peace morons.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please don't do this. There is absolutely nothing strange or startling about a people who have been subjected to genocide going on to commit it (see also: Serbia).

This sort of finger-wagging is crude and insulting, and the only outcome is far-right Zionists trying to pin the Holocaust on Palestinians and claiming that Palestinian animosity towards Israel is because of a European-style irrational hatred of Jews, not its colonial and genocidal actions.

This is not a morality play.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

It is a sad day in history when the leader of the Israeli government hates his neighbour so much that he is willing to absolve the most notorious war criminal in history, Adolf Hitler, of the murder of six million Jews.

Damn. Cut right to the core, without any bluster or hyperbole - because it wasn’t needed.

[–] SteefLem 13 points 3 months ago

They did learn… there using it in smaller form.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Is there a wiki on this accusation? I’d love to read that.

[–] t3h_fool 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You know, not having read Wikipedia on Israel, and not taking a stand, those that think Wikipedia is biased could put up a simple wiki like page that lists the biases and rewrites the article in a way that they would consider unbiased. This would be in the spirit of Wikipedia. People could really decide for themselves.

[–] mvirts 8 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›