this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
326 points (97.9% liked)

politics

20422 readers
5927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's worth noting that the things Trump says aren't just random nonsense; they're part of a larger disinformation campaign run by the fossil fuels industry.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Since when does this dude give a shit about whales?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since he saw one on that test he aced.

[–] dumpsterlid 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I desperately wish that somebody would ask Trump in an interview just the stupid question:

“Mr Trump, can you actually name a single species of whale that exists?”

I really don’t think he could. I think it would ruffle his feathers though, especially if you prefaced the question by stating most kids know at least 2 whales or something of the like. Set the bar super low, get him defensive about a silly dumb thing and then laugh at him when he can’t even clear it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"I've seen many whales before. They don't like windmills. I see them fly away as soon as they see a windmill. They say I'm the best at watching whales fly, did you know that?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whales? No. But he does care about being ~~king~~ president of America.

[–] SinningStromgald 5 points 1 year ago

Whales? No. But he does care about being ~~king~~ ~~president~~ dictator of America.

Let's be completely honest with ourselves now.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 1 year ago

Gotta get ambergris somewhere

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ever since saying something which is contrary to the evidence about whales became a way to annoy people who care about them.

[–] Passerby6497 25 points 1 year ago

"...many of his criticisms are untrue"

Is 'many' a synonym for 'all' now?

[–] FlyingSquid 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for stepping up to the plate there, NYT. Where were you eight years ago?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Too busy posting ghost-written opinion pieces on quiet quitting. Or is that the WSJ? I forget. They are all the same now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's RIGHT! WINDMILLS, NOT Oil Spills, drive Whales CRAZY!

[–] Subverb 7 points 1 year ago

Or ridiculously powerful military and commercial sonar and pingers.

[–] raynethackery 21 points 1 year ago

Like these people care about the whales.

[–] espentan 21 points 1 year ago

Even if it were true, I reckon the whales would rather stay away from wind farms than have the entire planet go to shit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

You misunderstood him. With "Whales" he did not mean Cetaceae, he meant fat donors.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

What's actually driving whales crazy is international shipping.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So are Maga dorks now pro Whales? They gonna protect the whales with new laws? It is such a flimsy argument that goes not further and reveals how stupidly they lie without substance.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Why make an effort lying well when your voters are just so fucking stupid?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No, they’re just anti-everything else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Well.... if you classify trump as a whale..... then yes they are driving the whale crazy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

If by "driving whales crazy" he means "creating habitat for small fishes that make up a lot of their diet" then, yes, they're crazy for wind farms.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we just get a single article, maybe weekly, listing the stuff Trump lied about it made up? It's exhausting getting the constant stream of articles about each individual lie.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, 3 lies are examined in this article, not just one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

In another time in place, this might be funny.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 3 points 1 year ago

I suppose I should be satisfied, but he can churn out three lies in a sentence, so it just doesn't feel like progress.

[–] grue 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, because if they waited a whole week to print them all at once, there'd be no room in the paper for the rest of that day's news.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 3 points 1 year ago

Well that is capitalism brought to news. New daily articles gets more clicks, and ads, than an comprehensive list. That's just the golden rule. Doesn't matter if a thing is needed or wanted, it will still be made if there is profit to be made as well.

[–] Etterra 6 points 1 year ago

Lying liar lies again.

Ftfy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If it's not clear, he just tends to spout whatever pops into his head.

[–] SuckMyWang 2 points 1 year ago

Na, trump wouldn’t just lie /s

[–] Naja_Kaouthia 2 points 1 year ago

Breaking news: water is wet. More at 11.

[–] ATDA 1 points 1 year ago

My understanding is it only effects the orange whale.