this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
915 points (92.0% liked)

News

23261 readers
4985 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Run, you fucking piece of shit. Go go go gogogogogogog!

My niece told her grandmother about her fear of getting murdered at school. Feel that fear, asshole.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay 177 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wait, you mean he wasn't suddenly transformed into a good-guy action hero with a gun? I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

[–] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This event only marks the beginning of his metamorphosis.

In the future, when an unsuspecting minority youth mistakenly knocks on his mansion’s gate, the transformation will be complete.

[–] JustZ 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not until they reverse to back down the driveway and try to leave will it complete.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm starting to think that the gun lobby might be lying to us...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I would love to be wrong, but it's too bad one of the injured or killed weren't connected to the governor. That seems to be the only time some people give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They still don't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_baseball_shooting

The only difference is they were a lot faster to admit it was an act of terrorism. No efforts to limit the access to firearms to prevent it in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (6 children)

They'll just say more guns and you know it.

[–] ceenote 57 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"Clearly, the 800 police officers that were there weren't enough. 1,600 cops would have made those villains think twice!"

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble 35 points 8 months ago

As the saying goes, when seconds count the police are minutes away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TenderfootGungi 12 points 8 months ago (7 children)

If you had a gun would you pull it? There were likely hundreds of guns there. But there was also hundreds of police officers ready to take down anyone with a gun.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

At least two of the shooters were taken down by unarmed bystanders who immediately tackled them to the ground.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 8 months ago (4 children)

So the solution to getting republicans on the side of gun control is just… shooting at them? I can get behind that.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 85 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I mean, it worked for the Black Panthers, and they weren’t even trying to get gun control laws put in place.

For the unaware, modern gun control laws basically started with the Black Panthers. During the civil rights movement, peaceful protests would get violently busted by the cops. But people quickly noticed that heavily armed protests would have the cops politely watching from across the street. (Turns out, cops are way less likely to fire into a crowd when the entire crowd can immediately return fire.) So the Black Panthers started arming themselves, to keep the cops from shutting down their protests.

When Republican lawmakers realized that the cops weren’t going to shut down the heavily armed protests on their front lawns, they got really fucking sweaty, really fucking fast. So conservatives pushed the Mulford Act, which was (at the time) the most restrictive gun control law the country had ever seen. It was authored by Ronald Reagan (yes, the same Reagan that the right upholds as a paragon of conservative values) and endorsed by the NRA, (yes, the same NRA that lobbies for looser gun control in the wake of mass school shootings.) All because the wrong people had guns.

The goal of the Mulford Act was to criminalize gun ownership, so the cops could bust individual protesters after the fact, instead of needing to break up an entire protest as it was happening. And it basically set the stage for modern gun control laws. The cops would follow individual protesters home, and kick in their front door while they were having dinner with their family the next evening. This is ironically what led to the Black Panthers becoming so militant, as they implemented anti-espionage tactics to protect the group. Code names, so busted members wouldn’t be able to positively identify other members by name. Segmented information, so a busted member (even a high ranking member) wouldn’t be able to compromise an entire protest. Randomized meeting locations, so cops couldn’t set up stings ahead of time. Etc, etc… It took them from “the people who really like guns and peacefully protest with them for self defense” to “a full blown armed guerrilla-protest group.”

[–] derphurr 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"I don’t see any peaceful way to disarm America’s whites. There’s only one thing that’s going to save this country from itself. Same thing that always saves this country from itself. And that is African-Americans. And I know the question a lot of y’all have in your minds is, should we do it? Fuck yeah, we should do it.”

“No matter what they say or how they make you feel, remember, this is your country, too. It is incumbent upon us to save our country. And you know what we have to do"

"Every able-bodied African-American must register for a legal firearm. That’s the only way they’ll change the law.”

-- Dave Chappelle (2019)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Fuckin jowls must have been all kinds of flappin.

[–] ChicoSuave 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like a basset hound in a hurricane

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BetaBlake 12 points 8 months ago

Once he picks up enough speed they flatten out like plane wings and he's able to get some air and fly away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkSurferZA 53 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that he wasn't the good guy with a gun?

[–] RGB3x3 23 points 8 months ago (38 children)

They never are. And by "they," I mean everyone who carries a gun for "protection," and by "never," I mean that the good guy with a gun almost never actually stops shootings.

Just look at the numbers of justifiable homicides vs the number of murders by guns in the US. The justifiable homicides are almost statistically insignificant in comparison.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Clearly he forgot to bring his Good Guy Gun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Confused_Emus 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] RedditWanderer 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't mind slower actually

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg 44 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Things to do during a mas shooting:

  1. Try to escape
  2. If you can't escape, hide.
  3. If you can't escape or hide, fight back.

Supporting gun ownership or even carrying a gun on your hip doesn't change that. All carrying a gun does for you in a mass shooting is mature the odds a little less terrible if it comes to option 3.

A handgun is imprecise, low-power, and difficult to aim accurately. On top of that a "good guy with a gun" has to care about collateral damage.

The purpose of carrying a handgun is personal defense, not civil defense. It's good defense against assault or a mugger. It's a good deterrent from someone who why's to harm you and walk away. It's not good for taking on an unhinged maniac that's fully intending to die.

Mass shooters are the suicide bombers of the US.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 100_percent_a_bot 43 points 8 months ago

"You proclaim to love the ocean, yet you flee from the tsunami.. Curious"

[Charlie Kirk.png]

[–] DevCat 36 points 8 months ago

"...Governor & First Lady Parson want to thank the Missouri Highway Patrol, KCPD, and their security officers for their quick and professional actions."

For getting our own asses out of there, while leaving everyone else to fend for themselves.

"I just ran away from a mass shooting at the Chiefs parade where I saw the Missouri governor (the gun lover below) running scared for his life next to me with an army of officers protecting him," Quaife wrote"

[–] cmoney 30 points 8 months ago

Now that we're in election season I see political ads for Republicans running for various things on TV, almost all of them show them brandishing or firing some sort of military style assault weapon. These politicians spew bullshit about protecting kids but instead are a big reason why we now have so many dead ones .

[–] recapitated 24 points 8 months ago

If only he was a teacher, then he could have saved himself and everyone around him.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (11 children)

As much as I'm on the same page as everyone here; America's gun laws need to change, are you not allowed to be afraid of the very well known thing your hobby does? Like, being afraid of being shot doesn't make you a hypocrite for liking guns.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't think anyone is honestly shaming this person for being afraid.

They are shaming him for refusing to do anything about a situation that he eventually wound up in himself, and suggesting that if he's not going to do something legislatively then he damn well better do something in person, else he has failed in his duty to care for his citizenry. Which is like saying the pot is black, honestly, since politicians don't care about the citizenry.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

The GOP had a stance of good guys with guns will defend people with said guns. So voting to have the guns present and not having one and running instead of defending the people either shows he was a coward by their stance, or not one of the good guys.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If Guns are so Safe why were people running AWAY from the Gun? Wouldn't the Gunman be the Safest person there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (9 children)

This strikes me as like implying that I'm hypocritical because I support gay marriage, but then turned down a man who hits on me because im not actually gay.

A person can be pro gun rights and at the same time still be afraid of an active shooter.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 18 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I’m hypocritical because I support gay marriage, but then turned down a man who hits on me because im not actually gay.

It would be ironic to loudly and repeatedly declare "If you don't want to get hit on at a bar, put on that wedding ring" and then get chased out of a bar by a bunch of married men slapping your ass.

A person can be pro gun rights and at the same time still be afraid of an active shooter.

A person who stakes their reputation on the phrase "An Armed Society Is A Polite Society" fleeing said armed society for their lack of politeness establishes a certain hypocrisy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Who is saying anything about hypocrisy? This is about the guy feeling the consequences for his shitty policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

But I was assured by every Republican ever that any gop politician is actually Steven Seagal in his prime and could stop any threat with their ankle holstered dual pistols and secret AR??

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

But I was assured by every Republican ever that any gop politician is actually Steven Seagal in his prime and could stop any threat with their ankle holstered dual pistols and secret AR??

Steven Seagal in his prime is admittedly a low bar.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365 18 points 8 months ago

I'm gonna need video proof that that old dude can run.

[–] TokenBoomer 17 points 8 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

How much do you want to bet this coward bought his tickets and paid for his travel to Las Vegas and the food and hotel and whatever else while there with state taxpayer money?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PeckerBrown 12 points 8 months ago

Typical GOP chickenshit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's so ridiculous that in a country where social nets are so poor people go bankrupt from going to the doctor that they expect people to suddenly act like heroes and risk life and limb when a shooter pops up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›