this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
659 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18987 readers
3270 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 147 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Plus the $2,000,000,000 that his bagboy son-in-law got from the Saudis

[–] LEDZeppelin 81 points 9 months ago

Republicans are justifying that by investigating Hunter’s laptop

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (9 children)
[–] Rapidcreek 104 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, if one of Obama's relatives got a 2 billion dollar check from a foreign country after he left office, it would still be a big story.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A tan suit was considered a "big story"

If that had happened, there would have been a republican countrywide manhunt to execute him.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Forget the tan suit, those fuckers freaked out about using a different type of mustard.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A much better type of mustard too. What kind of adult chooses to eat yellow mustard?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

The same ones who voted twice for Donald Trump and who will vote for him again this November. Won't catch them using no fancy mustard.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget "saluting with a cup in his left hand"... which is something everyone in the military does daily.

[–] Donjuanme 10 points 9 months ago

No worries about trump saluting Kim

[–] MegaUltraChicken 3 points 9 months ago

Forget the tan suit, those fuckers freaked out about using a different type of mustard.

[–] gastationsushi 39 points 9 months ago

No need to defend Jared. He got several huge loans while was Trump in office.

Here's a link to one of them: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sec-drops-probe-after-company-gives-loan-to-jared-kushners-family-firm/

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 9 months ago

To be even fairer, so did most of the things they're accusing Hunter Biden of even though he never even worked for his father.

[–] chiliedogg 15 points 9 months ago

Completely unrelated to Trump stealing classified nuclear data the Saudis were willing to pay billions to get their hands on.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 12 points 9 months ago

So did any selling off of stolen classified material

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I could swear that I was hearing about this deal while Trump was president... Its paywalled so I didn't look at the article, but maybe the deal was made prior to him leaving and the payment came later?

[–] BeautifulMind 2 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

yeah, he got paid for all the work he did while they were in office

[–] SuckMyWang 3 points 9 months ago

Plus I don’t think it’s his money, it’s just money he manages for a fee. The fee would be good on that sort of money I’m sure

[–] Fedizen 1 points 9 months ago

When was hog king hunter in office?

[–] snekerpimp 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Shock! Utter shock that a man that is under investigation for fraud and inciting an insurrection would take money from a foreign entity! How could this happen?!

/s I feel is necessary

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

He should try asking Russia for help again

[–] someguy3 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How many people/organizations/governments booked lengthy stays at his hotels and then never actually stayed a night?

[–] Fleamo 34 points 9 months ago

The Australian billionaire who leaked the nuclear sub info he got from Trump bragged about doing that. Called it a cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago

I guess we’ll just put this over there with the rest of the treason…

[–] BeautifulMind 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So much for the Emoluments clause

[–] RedditReject 28 points 9 months ago

Obligatory mention of Carter having to sell his peanut farm....

[–] carl_dungeon 19 points 9 months ago

Lock him up !!!

[–] donescobar 13 points 9 months ago

He is a savvy businessman, is breaking the law is illegal now? smh

[–] badbytes 9 points 9 months ago

Deafing silence from those who claim outrage.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Using documents produced through a court fight, the report describes how foreign governments and their controlled entities, including a top U.S. adversary, interacted with Trump businesses while he was president.

”By elevating his personal financial interests and the policy priorities of corrupt foreign powers over the American public interest, former President Trump violated both the clear commands of the Constitution and the careful precedent set and observed by every previous commander in chief,” Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, wrote in a foreword to the report.

Among the countries patronizing Mr. Trump’s properties, China made the largest total payment — $5.5 million — to his business interests, the report found.

After they won court rulings, Mazars USA, the longtime accounting firm for Mr. Trump that cut ties with him and his family business, began in 2022 turning over documents related to his financial dealings.

Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky and the chairman of the Oversight Committee, made clear he had abandoned any investigation into the former president’s financial dealings and was instead focusing on whether Mr. Biden and members of his family were involved in an influence-peddling scheme.

“Critically, even this subset of documents reveals a stunning web of millions of dollars in payments made by foreign governments and their agents directly to Trump-owned businesses while President Trump was in the White House,” the report states.


The original article contains 873 words, the summary contains 234 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Surprising literally fucking no one

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

... most of it from China.

Before or after he CONSTANTLY blamed them for covid in the most racist ways possible?

[–] fne8w2ah 3 points 9 months ago

The endgame of Citizens United.

[–] answersplease77 2 points 9 months ago

Media reports are not enough, ther should be conviction and jail

load more comments
view more: next ›