this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
365 points (97.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27046 readers
1243 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ccunning 45 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Buying E10 fuel (a mixture that contains 10 percent ethanol) from a hose that also supplies E15 fuel (a mixture that contains 15 percent ethanol) must buy at least four gallons to protect customers following behind. Ethanol is hard on engines and less efficient than regular gasoline. E15 can even cause engine failure in smaller or older engines. So if you’re using a blender pump to buy E10 that sells both E15 and E10, the residual amount of E15 left in the hose from the previous customer could cause significant damage to those smaller and older engines—unless you purchase at least 4 gallons.

Source

[–] billiam0202 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hold the fuck up.

Customer A buys 10 gallons of E15.

Customer B buys 1 gallon of E10 from the same pump.

Customer C buys 1 gallon of E10 from the same pump and puts it in his chainsaw. If that gallon ruins Customer C's chainsaw, it's legally Customer B's fault? What the fuck?

Forcing B to buy more gas than he might want, to protect the customer after him, because of the customer that came before him, is some horseshit.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The gas companies bought a law to exempt themselves from liability.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Story of everything…

[–] billiam0202 0 points 7 months ago

Maybe these climate change purveyors should be forced to separate E10 and E15 dispensers.

[–] ripcord 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

This fucking law right here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Legally customers C fault. He needed to buy 4 gallons and fucked himself.

[–] Mango -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why is it bad to have rules which prevent harm to everyone?

Nobody is forcing anyone to buy anything. You ever see a 2oz bottle of Coke?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't prevent harm to everyone it just allows gas stations to use a single pump and shift the liability onto consumers.

[–] Mango -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you can't see the practicality, that's on you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Boo. If you're gonna troll, at least make it interesting.

[–] papalonian 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is forcing anyone to buy anything.

In the given example, is the gas station not forcing Customer B to purchase more gas than they may want or need? What if I have a chainsaw with a 1 gallon fuel tank? Now I need to not only buy more gas than I can use, but a container to safely store it in. (It's also illegal to dispense gasoline to/from an unauthorized container!) Now if I use my chainsaw once or twice a year, I also get to dump out that extra gasoline because it's gone bad by the time I need to use it again.

[–] Mango -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you have an ethanol chainsaw? Maybe an ethanol weed whacker? Got some links to these small ethanol motors?

[–] billiam0202 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

E10 and E15 mostly aren't ethanol. They're 90% and 85%, respectively, gasoline, with the rest being ethanol.

[–] Mango 0 points 7 months ago
[–] ripcord 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's a pretty stupid comparison. These aren't prepackaged containers, and that's a pretty key part of the terrible point you were trying to make.

[–] Mango 1 points 7 months ago

Ok then, try to book an attorney for 10 minutes only.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 14 points 7 months ago

This seems like it's flipped around backwards. The picture says you have to pump more than 4 gallons if you are getting E15, but the explanation seems to explain why someone pumping E10 would want to pump more than 4 gallons.

I bet the real reason is that someone could pump a couple of gallons of cheaper E15, knowing they'd actually receive E10, leaving the next person to actually get that gas.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ok, that makes sense, but why a federal law?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why force companies to buy pumps that blend when you can force all liability onto the customer?

Gas stations can get away buying cheap blending pumps and if it breaks someone's older car just shrug and say it must have been the previous customer's fault, we're not liable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

"We don't care about service and quality. Oh, and we make it be your problem."

[–] Everythingispenguins 2 points 7 months ago

It's probably administrative law associated with DOT regulations. So yes it is a law but not quite in the same way you think of when Congress passes a law. Instead Congress passed a law that said DOT we give this agency the power to regulate these specific things. Go create a working committee and create some regulation. Administrative law is a bit more like civil law than criminal law. In general violation is just fine and they are handled by administrative law courts. Part of what makes them so different is they do not fall under the justice department they are contained within whichever agency has jurisdiction over that area of regulation. They've been affirmed to be functionally the same as federal courts, but can only sanction the guilty party in the exact manner the regulation says. Otherwise when the case is concluded and a party is found guilty is then referred to a federal court for sanctions.