this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
638 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3128 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 147 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The more we know, the more this looks to me like a suicide by cop that wanted (and failed) to leave a huge thing done so people remembered him.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Which is definitely why the media is posting his picture and personal details everywhere right? To make sure other people aren't persuaded to seek fame in the same way.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The guy tried (and almost managed) to kill an ex-president and candidate for a second term. Of course the media is going to cover all the shit they can. It gives them clicks and that's all that matter.

On the other handl, apparently, the guy had some mental health issues was bullied and honestly, what other outcome can you expect if not a very fast death when you try to do what he did in the way he did it?

Either he was out of his mind and was completely delusional, or was trying to leave the world with a huge kill in his name to be remembered.

Edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I absolutely agree, but I think it's important to neither glorify nor demonize the attacker. This isn't a route we should keep open to gain fame/infamy.

[–] Passerby6497 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If there's one guarantee in this world, it's that shooting someplace up will always get your name in the news.

[–] samus12345 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Although in the US it's so common you'll be forgotten in days unless the target is somebody famous.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Good. Let’s keep running that so the famous people are the ones getting shot. Not our nations children in schools 😊

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Welcome to late stage Capitalism.

[–] pivot_root 2 points 4 months ago

You're not wrong, but it can be put even more succinctly: "But, money!"

[–] Dkarma 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He was a self proclaimed Pedo Hunter

[–] Grimy 90 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

Not even a zing, it's a sad fact

[–] Mediocre_Bard 3 points 4 months ago

That's exactly what Trump heard on that stage.

[–] lennybird 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I keep hearing this but what's the source?

[–] thesushicat 11 points 4 months ago

The only place I've seen that is screenshots of clearly fake Instagram account bios.

[–] NevermindNoMind 20 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Here is my irresponsible speculation: kid did it to get back at his dad. Dad was a republican flying trump signs in the yard, mom is registered democratic. Kid grows up wearing hunting outfits to school, trying to get on the shooting team, getting bullied (even after that time he tried to fit in by getting on the antitrump bandwagon following j6), trying to be the version of manliness his conservative father believes in, seaking his father's approval, and paying the price socially with his peers. But as much as he tries, and fails, to get dad's approval, mom is always there for him. Mom is a dem, probably secretly, with dad forcing strict "traditional" family roles (hence the signs in the yard, mom probably didn't agree with but was powerless to stop). Kid seems to fit the stereotype of young man, bullied in school, working a dead end job, few if any friends, no future to speak of, just generally mentally unstable, ripe for suicide by cop alreadt. Then something happens, dad hits mom, dad cheats on mom, dad screams at kid calling him a loser and also yells at mom for rasing a mommas boy, something like that. Kid snaps, betrayed by his father again, but also protective of his mom who was always there for him. Kid decides rather than killing his dad (either because of unshakable childhood fear, or a desire to cause more pain to his father then death would afford), he would kill something his dad loved more than anything, more than his dad loved his mom, and especially more than his dad loved him. He'd kill dad's god king Trump, and go out along with him. His dad would lose his hero, and the world would know his dad was responsible because he failed as a father, and thus his father would be the greatest traitor to the Maga movement ever.

I base this on no evidence other than the couple of facts we know about voter registrations and the yard signs and the like. Again this is just my speculation, which it is completely irresponsible to engage in right now (fun though!).

[–] [email protected] 81 points 4 months ago (2 children)

really thought you were going to end that with the source of the truma being because in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

We really need users like that on Lemmy to replicate the positive aspects of the Reddit community that are worth bringing over. Something original to here, hopefully.

[–] hemmes 10 points 4 months ago

I base this on no evidence other than the fact that in nineteen ninety eight the undertaker threw mankind off hеll in a cell, and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcer's table.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

You are right, this post was incredibly irresponsible.

[–] Restaldt 8 points 4 months ago

Your chair must have massive armrests

Seems as reasonable as most other theories

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Like you already said, you're obviously speculating, but I think you might be onto something re: the dad. Dad trauma combined with suicidal ideation...it's plausible and way more reasonable a motive than a lot of the stuff out there.

[–] TrickDacy 6 points 4 months ago

You should write.. because you basically nailed a believable story here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It very well could be that. It could also be a girl told him she'd let him touch her boobies for 10 seconds if he shot Trump.