this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
466 points (98.5% liked)

News

23317 readers
3596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Renters burdened by unaffordable housing costs may be at a higher risk of dying sooner, according to a new study published in the journal Social Science & Medicine.

An individual paying 50% of their income toward rent in 2000 was 9% more likely to die over the next 20 years compared with someone paying 30% of their income toward rent, according to the study from researchers at Princeton University and the U.S. Census Bureau’s Center for Economics Studies. Someone paying 70% of their income toward rent, meanwhile, was 12% more likely to die.

“We were surprised by the magnitude of the relationship between costs and mortality risk,” said Nick Graetz, a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University and the study’s lead author. “It’s an especially big problem when we consider how many people are affected by rising rents. This isn’t a rare occurrence.”

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 55 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Up next: "You can't afford rent, therefore you're at risk for premature death. So we'll be increasing how much you pay for health insurance."

[–] EmpathicVagrant 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rent is now a preexisting condition.

[–] agent_flounder 5 points 11 months ago

But be sure to sign up for a low interest rate Funeral Loan. You too can live on in the minds of your loved ones: through debt!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Extortionate landlords aren't going to be influenced by an excessive risk of premature death among extorted tenants.

Extortionate landlords are only going to care about a study that finds extortionate landlords have an excessive risk of premature death.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Do landlords offer health insurance where you live?

[–] query 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course. The more you have to spend on shelter, the less you have for everything else.

Cuts should be made at the top, not the bottom. Always. If you have to raise your rents, no you don't. You have spare properties, you're doing fine.

[–] MisterFrog 1 points 11 months ago

Isn't the the most depressing part of capitalism... Investment profits are more important to our society than preventing housing stress -_-

[–] blinks6517 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well if they’re going to die they’d better go ahead and do it and decrease the surplus population!

Seems I read that somewhere before.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 16 points 11 months ago

"Top 10 reasons why premature death and suicide are good for the economy" — MSM

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I just put the Muppet version of that movie on last night. What a coincidence lol.

[–] cheese_greater 12 points 11 months ago

Ifs goddamn social murder and nobody will be held responsible. But they should

[–] EvilEyedPanda 10 points 11 months ago

That's what corporate wants, die just before you retire so they can maximize profits.

[–] CustodialTeapot 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Next we'll need a study that proves gun rights increase death rates.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I imagine there are already dozens.

Just because something is obvious or intuitive doesn't mean we don't need science for it.

[–] Viking_Hippie 6 points 11 months ago

Yep. Social murder of the poor, minorities, and especially of poor minorities is one of the main pillars of the fucked up system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Causing physical harm to capitalists is self-defense.

[–] LufyCZ 3 points 11 months ago

This doesn't sound like it is about rent prices, but more about the income of the individual.

If you have more money, you can spend more on healthcare, higher quality food, ...

Of course if rent was cheaper people would have more money, but in absolute values (not %), I don't think the study would see as much of a difference

[–] M137 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In the thumbnail of the image, I didn't see the "u" in "housing," so I thought it said: "Hosing is a human right". Immediately though of riot control water canons... And then that it was someone very into a specific kind of submissive BDSM that has no other outlet for their need.

Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Hosing is a human right 😘

[–] Orionza 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Let's give retirees $1000 a month in social security to live on while basic rent on a junky place is $2500 a month. Then let's calculate that a 65 year old person may live to 85. 20 years. You got the funky result study above.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 11 months ago

$1000 if you're lucky. The minimum is around $50.