this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
370 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19152 readers
2773 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to take up a case on the abortion pill mifepristone has unnerved Republicans from swing districts.The court's decision last year to overturn Roe v. Wade limited GOP gains in last year's midterm elections and is expected to again play a major role in next year's elec...

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate 140 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Man, it must suck to feel vulnerable like that.

By which I mean the women stripped of their reproductive freedoms.

The Republicans can eat a salty bag of dog balls marinated in phlegm.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

It's important to spay and neuter our pets, but the dogs deserve to have their balls treated more respectfully than that.

[–] [email protected] 130 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, sucks being a member of the "Fuck You Got Mine" party, doesn't it? Almost as if empathy and following the science is the better paradigm...

[–] NounsAndWords 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but fear and gerrymandering win elections.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It does but generally only when there's a major looming threat and/or we are asleep at the wheel and let them spread bullshit without challenge.

What they've failed to account for is the fact that women can surprisingly vote. And women are overwhelmingly not voting for the anti woman party. I suspect even the most vocal right wing ladies are closing the curtain and choosing not to vote against their own interests. Since right wing women love to secretly get abortions, it tracks.

Abortion is the issue that the right never actually wanted to win. It made for perfect performance art. You could sing all day about it and get the Christian vote and you never actually had to do a thing but just promise you would keep fighting the good fight. Except the super religious nuts used trump to get cultist judges in place and they actually fucking did it. Now they're dealing with the consequences of their own actions. Rich Republicans never wanted to get rid of abortions. They need abortions on account of all the women they impregnate that aren't their Christian wives. Sure they can still get them but it's suuuuper inconvenient to have to send the cleaning lady on spirit airlines to a blue state.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The phrase "the dog that caught the car" has not been used enough to describe this situation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I said it yesterday, the #fascist #GOP have finally caught the car & are currently being pulled under the tire.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately they're not going to lie down and die. They're probably going to try another coup attempt.

Republicans are an existential threat to the United States.

[–] cheese_greater 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But but but GOP is run by a woman?! /s

[–] assembly 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I haven’t heard that one but I did see a clip of Anne Coulter saying women shouldn’t have the right to vote. Can you imagine that? I mean what women are voting against their own right to vote?

[–] cheese_greater 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Her name's Ronna McDaniel, K, here's the deal:

  1. Imma give you link1 to watch her
  2. You must play this (link2) simultaneously on another device via bluetooth audio to have her background music

Just trust me (Spoiler alert: she's Porky Minch's mom from EarthBound 🤣)

[–] cheese_greater 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

She also spoke out against the Texas abortion case (on the right side even o_O). Her legs are the only part of her I take seriously but I definitely would find her entertaining if he worldview wasn't so problematic

[–] SinningStromgald 6 points 11 months ago

Trump is a woman?!

[–] [email protected] 50 points 11 months ago (3 children)

"I suspect they'll rule in favor of prohibitions which is a mistake," said one vulnerable House Republican.

There’s such an easy solution to this problem. Just join the Democrats and vote to legalize abortion. You are a lawmaker, after all.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago

The party of personal responsibility does not want to be held to any level of responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There's this trope "only Democrats have agency". It's where we look at Democrats for failing to do things or making choices, but Republicans are just like automatic forces of nature. We don't hold them accountable for their actions.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That's not a bad philosophy when all you care about is the moral victory. If you care about results however, there's little use in pearl clutching and acting offended by the idea of fascists doing fascism. It's what they do. I don't blame the crocodile for eating the baby, it's a dangerous reptile that needs to be put down, but it's predictable and doing exactly what it's programmed to do. I blame the adults who sat around and assumed they could allow the baby to wander that close to the water's edge without anything happening, all the while filling its' head with pro-crocodile propaganda. Individual humans are intelligent beings with agency, groups of humans are stupid and vulnerable to manipulation. Time to get your gun and go gator huntin'.

[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s not a bad philosophy when all you care about is the moral victory.

The party abandoned that when it expected everyone to be happy with funding genocide. "Moral victory" was just the party's excuse for moral cowardice.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86 -1 points 11 months ago

Good for you, get crackin' or have fun in the camps. We have fascists to deal with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It's not that Republicans are not responsible for their actions. The issue is they can't be influenced to be less evil. They're the Borg, the Daleks, or Sauron's orc hordes. All we can do with them is try to defeat them.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 11 months ago

There’s such an easy solution to this problem. Just join the Democrats and vote to legalize abortion.

Then it might pass the house and be filibustered in the Senate. Democrats could get rid of the filibuster for good, but they don't wanna.

[–] Fades 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’re coming for contraceptives next, they will have their dumb and poor labor force to carry the economy at least till the remainder of their corrupt lives

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm certain that regardless of whatever they do, they can't fuck their way out of America's population decline.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Ironically the best thing we have to counter it is immigration, but of course they're against that.

[–] atx_aquarian 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This thorn in my side is from the tree I planted.

[–] BackOnMyBS 8 points 11 months ago

It tears me and I bleed

[–] daikiki 40 points 11 months ago

"Tone deaf" is a weird way to pronounce illegitimate.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Looking at how badly the Democrats are beating the polls at the ballot boxes post RvW, they should be terrified.

Combine this with demographics & the #fascist #GOP may not even be a national party by 2028.

[–] thantik 35 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Voter suppression and gerrymandering will stop this from actually happening. They'll become smaller and smaller, and louder and louder.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Except mathematically, you can only gerrymander a given area so much before you start giving your opponent an advantage in other areas & they hit that limit around 2019. Voter suppression isn't really working for them lately either, going by the last few elections, and the anger regarding this is actually driving more people to the polls.

Floridian in a blood red county here. My kids & most of their friends are furious at the GOP & can't wait to vote.

[–] Fedizen 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

their whole goal atm is to create enough doubt that they can throw the next presidential election to the courts or the house.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, same as last election. That tactic just made them look like fools.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86 7 points 11 months ago

It doesn't matter to them how they look, so long as they're the ones wearing the crown when it's all over.

[–] CobblerScholar 17 points 11 months ago

Put the bullshit impeachment in the mix and one can certainly hope

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I've heard this same refrain for over 10 years now. The GOP isn't going away.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

They aren't tone deaf, but I do understand why establishment Democrats have a hard time understanding it.

You see, they have an actual ideological political project with goals, and they work to achieve those concrete goals, no matter what.

The festing sore that is our post-labor movement Democratic party doesn't have a larger political project other than "maintain power and influence", which is why they proactively work to co-opt or shutdown any insurgent and ideological left members.

The Democrats can't understand why conservatives would enact policies that may hurt their influence, because they don't understand that the end goal of politics is supposed to be policies, and not just maintaining your own personal fiefdoms of power and insider trading tips.

Edit: I'm talking SCOTUS, which this article incorrectly accuses of being tone deaf.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Republicans' only agenda is to hurt people and further enrich the wealthy, and you say the Democrats' only goal is power? Stopping the Republicans is a worthy goal all by itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Stopping the Republicans is a worthy goal all by itself.

It is. But I'm still frustrated that the Democrats cannot put together a coherent platform for change that has any juice in it. Things are not getting better for people and need to change, but the Dems have not strongly pushed a real platform in a while now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A) I was referring to the tone deaf Supreme Court and their larger policy project.

B) The Democratic Party's leadership is not the same as it's voters. But, the fact that you're content with their only achievement being "stop the Republicans" proves my point.

Nothing would make the Democratic leadership happier then to continue to shift the party more to the right to "pickup GOP moderate voters", because ultimately they are all diehard neoliberals. This mentality let's them off the hook for not doing anything to advance larger leftist policies that their voters want, would help the country, but hurt their donors, as well as their own stock portfolios e.g. Universal Healthcare, Pro-Act, etc.

[–] Zess 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This dude thinks Republicans care about policy 💀💀💀

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Republicans? No.

SCOTUS? Yes.

And as I said, they (SCOTUS) aren't tone deaf, they're handpicked Federalist Society religious zealots.

[–] limonfiesta 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Isn't the article talking about a "tone deaf Supreme Court"?

[–] AutistoMephisto 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe they don't, but they have goals they want to achieve, by hook or by crook. While we can all agree that "The ends justify the means!" is a shitty moral philosophy, Democrats, and liberals in particular have this problem where they over-correct to the point where thinking about the ends at all is, in some vaguely reflexive kinda way, innately immoral. And when you spend all your time worrying about how to go about things instead of focusing on what things to go about, you end up not getting anything done because you're not willing to have an actual position.

[–] DevCat 1 points 11 months ago

This is what happens when the dog finally catches the car.