this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
338 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19150 readers
3725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Larry Giberson joined the mob in the tunnel during the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TallonMetroid 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Giberson’s mother said that for her son, the 2020 election was like watching his favorite baseball team on a World Series run.

Both of them are fucking morons.

[–] Zombiepirate 48 points 1 year ago

Giberson, a political science major who specialized in "American ideas and institutions,” told FBI special agents he wanted to be at the Capitol to "support the parties that were making decisions regarding the certification of the electoral college, and that he was there to encourage what he believed to be the 'correct' certification."

Further evidence to bolster the point

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally the problem with American politics. If you make a political party your identity, any attack on the politicians becomes a personal attack.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 year ago

Well, at least with one particular party.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this guy really need the national fame with MAGA that comes with making it on NBC? I don't get it. We've already had 400 convictions. This is a random kid that pled guilty to civil disorder and got 2 months in prison.

If anything, an article should question how someone whose allocution contradicts the evidence got 2 months despite the prosecutor pushing for a year.

[–] FlyingSquid 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It feels like the same sort of encouragement mass shooters get from the media. "Want to have your name everywhere? Do something atrocious!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. It should be anonymized in the media. "400 traitors, terrorists, and bigots have faced justice for their 1/6 actions, with more convictions coming in every day" <--that is the headline we should have. Few names, few faces, just facts.

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have mixed feelings. With mass shooters part of the reason for calls for anonymity is that they’re dead. For these people they’re alive and public knowledge of their crimes can give further consequences leading into my main mixed feelings: on one hand with some people like Brock (the rapist) Turner this can be a way of society providing the punishment that a pay to win justice system didn’t provide out of privilege, but on the other hand some people support these crimes and will celebrate them and also is it right to do and does it hinder rehabilitation?

Idk I think you’re probably right, but I do think that there’s more to it than just the name in the news thing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For these people they’re alive and public knowledge of their crimes can give further consequences leading into my main mixed feelings

When it's a politically-motivated crime, shame just doesn't work as a punishment or deterrent. Instead, it's a medal to put on their chest.

Brock (the rapist) Turner this can be a way of society providing the punishment that a pay to win justice system didn’t provide out of privilege

I think exile (or its equivalent) fall under Cruel and Unusual punishment. I think we shouldn't look for mobs or media to be the forces of justice; we should be demanding the justice system to clean its act up, and holding them accountable for these miscarriages.

but on the other hand some people support these crimes and will celebrate them and also is it right to do and does it hinder rehabilitation?

This here. We can't stop these criminals being treated like heroes for attempting to replace our democracy with tyranny. We can stop advertising that they did what they did.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I want a wall of shame somewhere so that employers, social media, dating apps, etc....know where to look these people up.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

specialized in "American ideas and institutions,”

He's a poly sci UNDERGRAD he didn't and doesn't specialize in shit.

[–] agent_flounder 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he specializes in being a gullible fool.

[–] CharlesDarwin 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but he dId his owN rEsEarch

[–] eran_morad 15 points 1 year ago

sucks brah. Next time don’t be a traitor.

[–] CharlesDarwin 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So sad. Fuck around and find out. Love donnie so hard that you come out of Ivy league with a rap sheet.

[–] Salamendacious 3 points 1 year ago

You know that this will just be maga street cred for some employer

[–] AgentGrimstone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope every single one of those traitors gets prison time. Bunch of idiots.

[–] Salamendacious 10 points 1 year ago

I really want all of them to just get convicted of felonies so they can't own guns and vote anymore.

[–] FastAndBulbous 9 points 1 year ago

Shudders like Sideshow Bob.... Ergggh Princeton.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — A then-Princeton University student who yelled "drag them out" while he joined rioters trying to storm the U.S. Capitol was sentenced to two months in federal prison Wednesday, according to court records.

Giberson was a sophomore during the Jan. 6 attack, when he "participated in coordinated pushing and pulling against the police," according to a government sentencing memo, which said that at one point he even chanted “drag them out!” as rioters assaulted officers.

Giberson told the FBI that he "saw the fear" in former Officer Michael Fanone's eyes as he was dragged away by the mob.

His defense attorney said Giberson "studied the issues surrounding the 2020 [election] and concluded that state actors had interfered with the electoral process in unconstitutional ways."

Giberson's mother said that for her son, the 2020 election was like watching his favorite baseball team on a World Series run.

I feel Larry wanted to be a part of something that he was passionate about, I know he had no intent to be caught up with the wrong crowd," she wrote.


The original article contains 412 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ShitOnABrick 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He got a 2 month sentence I think the punishment fits the crime although it should be highered slightly considering he did assault a poilce officer prehaps 5 or 6 months would work prehaps maybe some compensation or a apology as well