this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
80 points (94.4% liked)

politics

18887 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The House GOP picked Rep. Mike Johnson as their latest speaker nominee Tuesday evening, though the Louisiana Republican so far lacks the 217 votes needed to win the gavel – the latest sign that Republicans are still no closer to electing a new speaker three weeks after Kevin McCarthy’s historic ouster.

The vote for Johnson came at the end of a tumultuous day that began when Republicans voted to elect Minnesota Rep. Tom Emmer as speaker nominee only for Emmer drop out just hours later amid stiff resistance from the right flank of the conference and a major rebuke from former President Donald Trump.

In the final round of secret-ballot voting, Johnson was elected speaker nominee with 128 votes. McCarthy received 43 votes, the next highest tally, and some House Republicans are blaming the California Republican for undercutting Johnson’s ascent. Ahead of Tuesday night’s votes, some members raised the idea of a McCarthy tag team with Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan to solve the speakership stalemate – with McCarthy returning as speaker and then making Jordan his “assistant speaker,” sources told CNN.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clearedtoland 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

making Jordan his “assistant speaker.”

Now we’re really just making sh** up…

[–] coffeedog 32 points 11 months ago

Assistant to the speaker.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 7 points 11 months ago

Anything to pretend they’re running for President

[–] Riccosuave 6 points 11 months ago
[–] jordanlund 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So will he drop out before or after being humiliated in a floor vote?

[–] jeffw 12 points 11 months ago

shoves fistfuls of popcorn into mouth

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

Another insurrectionist.

[–] LEDZeppelin 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

there's enough floppy johnsons running the country already

[–] FuglyDuck 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They know there’s a pill for floppy Johnson’s, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, there was... before Gaetz ate them all.

[–] FrostyTrichs 3 points 11 months ago

I used to think one man couldn't possibly consume all the floppy Johnson's in Washington. Then I learned of Jim Jordan.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

brave of you to wait so long before posting that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Lets see, Johnson is an ultra right, election denier, anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-Ukraine, anti-tax on the wealthy christain +++. Yep, he seems to fit all the Reich buttons.

[–] aseriesoftubes 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How many Emmers will he last?

[–] clearedtoland 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What’s the conversion for Emmers to Moochis?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

If one Mooch is 11 days and one Emmer is four hours than one Mooch is 66 Emmers. But if used together than one could easily define larger blocks of time. For example 23 days can now be defined by 2 Mooches and 6 Emmers as opposed to a fractional Mooch of 2.09 repeating.

[–] Nobody 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

McCarthy will never let it go. He’s going to compromise the speakership even more with some awful deal for a “co-speaker” with some obstructionist asshole like Gym.

He’ll go down in history as the guy who turned the speakership into a joke. A clown amongst clowns. The face of failure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I thought he said he'd never do it again? And this is the first I've heard of him being back in (but I haven't been following that closely). When'd he flip flop (or am I wrong)?

[–] woddy 5 points 11 months ago

Unless he has changed his mind again, afaik he said "I wasnt gonna run for it again but after the Israel conflict Im looking into running again because the house needs leadership."

[–] Treczoks 9 points 11 months ago

How long will he last? The time for being a speaker candidate gets shorter and shorter, what will happen when they reach singularity?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The House GOP picked Rep. Mike Johnson as their latest speaker nominee Tuesday evening, though the Louisiana Republican so far lacks the 217 votes needed to win the gavel – the latest sign that Republicans are still no closer to electing a new speaker three weeks after Kevin McCarthy’s historic ouster.

The conference has repeatedly failed to coalesce around a successor to McCarthy amid deep division within its ranks – including for Jordan who was ousted as the party’s nominee on Friday after three unsuccessful rounds on the House floor.

The politically precarious situation has plunged the House into uncharted territory as it looks increasingly unclear whether any Republican can get the 217 votes needed to win the gavel.

After winning the party nomination in a secret ballot election on Tuesday, Emmer faced swift opposition from the right flank of his conference as well as a significant rebuke from former President Donald Trump.

Leaving a GOP conference meeting Monday night, Emmer told CNN, “We have a good relationship,” when asked about Trump.

Following Emmer’s withdrawal from the race, Republican Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas warned that the GOP is at an “impasse” and said he doesn’t know if they’ll be able to resolve their internal differences and find a speaker.


The original article contains 593 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ersatz86 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

smarm·y /ˈsmärmē/ adjective INFORMAL ingratiating and wheedling in a way that is perceived as insincere or excessive

And now we have a face to go with the definition

[–] cabron_offsets 0 points 11 months ago