this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
237 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tinder Launches $499 USD-Per-Month "Tinder Select" Membership::Tinder has rolled out its promised high-end membership, a pricey $499 per month subscription dubbed "Tinder Select," which includes unique perks like the

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] funnystuff97 228 points 11 months ago

This is all absurd, obviously, but:

The new subscription can be stacked with a Plus, Gold or Platinum subscription for access to more features, the company notes.

$499 and you don't even get everything there is to get? You still have to pay for more? What in the fuck?

[–] eager_eagle 213 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can subscribe to a hooker for less and have more sex

[–] Udonezo 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] MegaUltraChicken 23 points 11 months ago

Shit they could probably include travel to an area with legal prostitution and still come out ahead.

[–] roboticide 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I'm kind of surprised that not a single state has yet.

Like the states that legalized weed have made a bonkers amount of tax money while the others continue to lose out to other states or the black market. And oh look, suddenly way less drug crime.

Legalize it, regulate it, then tax it. The Netherlands figured it out. Kind of surprised Nevada hasn't taken their shot. A state could legalize it and watch their tourist and tax revenues skyrocket while likely lowering human trafficking to boot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald 108 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you are at the point where paying $499+ a month looks like the only way you'll ever have a significant other or even just sex just invest that money in therapy or drugs or a super high end sex doll or a high class hooker but not in fucking Tinder. Jesus.

[–] Koraboros 8 points 11 months ago

It’s probably like millionaire match maker where you get matched more with ppl who also paid $499

[–] 1bluepixel 85 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm guessing the only purpose of this is to show you have fuck-me money. Which sounds like it might work very, very well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That plan better deliver hoes at my address

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ad4mWayn3 59 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The ability to direct-message others without matching.

So basically your privacy only goes as far as how much other people are willing to pay

[–] RickTofu 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

According to the article it'll be opt-out for "some accounts" on the receiving side. God only knows what they mean by that

[–] CopernicusQwark 7 points 11 months ago

"Tinder Select Ultra Plus" tier membership, I'm guessing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireTower 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If dating apps were barred from collecting any payments besides a one time entry fee perhaps they'd stop all these anti customers practices.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Good luck getting that to happen. Could probably happen in the EU if it hasn't already, but in the US, you'd have better luck winning a SLAPP suit against the Cult ("church") of Scientology in an area where they are legally allowed to file them against you.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago

Well that's not dystopian at all

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 30 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Can we start a fediverse dating app?

I'm currently visiting the Ambien walrus writing this so forgive me if this idea is screwy, but I'd love to create a new space.

[–] rororo 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It would be 99% dudes. Oh wait

[–] blue_zephyr 7 points 11 months ago

Jokes on you, I'm into that shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lonnie123 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I'll start one for you for a meager $498/month

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re massively underestimating the amount of effort required to keep sketchiness off of a dating platform

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sucricdrawkcab 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm glad I was, continue to be and plan on being married to miss this nonsense.

[–] Alpha_Dog_ 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stupidmanager 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah. Few decades married over here too... Until last week. Still not paying for crap like this, but damn was that same joke not funny on Monday.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The "I'm that desperate" batch.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh not even that. Back when I used Tinder in 2019, and you were a guy, you pretty much had to buy Tinder gold or whatever it was.

Tinder limit your swipes, intentionally showed you dead profiles, and some other shit I forget.

Same with older people. If you're older, Tinder costs more.

Tinder is a predatory app. They benefit from you NOT finding a match.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Harpsist 24 points 11 months ago

For 500$ it better work as a ma'adam in a brothel.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

It just sounds like identifying rich sucker's to be plucked like apples and slaughtered like fattened calves by the trickier woman of tinder.

[–] brygphilomena 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

members can choose to display their status with an exclusive SELECT badge on their profile.

Now I ain't say she a gold digger...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This reads like a subscription to bang.

[–] StarManta 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, that would actually be worth the money. This sounds like a subscription to feel like even more of a loser when you still fail to get laid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The news was first reported by Bloomberg, and follows parent company Match Group’s earlier confirmation that Tinder would expand its membership options to include a new, high-end product catering to Gen Z users sometime this fall.

Tinder says that less than 1% of users will be allowed to gain access to this premium product, and members can choose to display their status with an exclusive SELECT badge on their profile.

Inspiration for this members-only club within Tinder comes from Match’s July 2022 acquisition of another high-end dating app, The League, which could cost users up to $1,000 per week.

In addition, Select members’ profiles will be shown unblurred in the Like You grid in the app for up to seven days, even if they don’t pay for Tinder Gold or Platinum subscriptions.

The company doesn’t detail how this technology works or how it rates these so-called “exceptional connections,” but one might imagine they include other Select members or those other users liked the most.

To apply for Tinder Select, users must have at least four photos, five interests, a bio with a minimum of 15 characters, show a relationship intent, be photo-verified and, importantly, have way too much money to spend on dating apps.


The original article contains 514 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] snekerpimp 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Local Asian massage parlor is like $150 plus tip for full service.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 7 points 11 months ago

Oh, that is just awful. I for one will never go anywhere near which location again?

[–] _number8_ 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i can't wait until the app bubble implodes

[–] MindSkipperBro12 10 points 11 months ago

ANY day now…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

IAC/Match Group owns this space and at this point the cash grab is so openly brazen. I hate it. Part of the reason i've folded on online dating and dating in general.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks 11 points 11 months ago

There are people so desperate for a fuck that they will pay this money. Will it solve the problem that the number of (real, existing) women on such platforms is lower than the demand? Probably not.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As someone who's never used it, what features are there that get paywalled? I have a very naïve idea about what it is like.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Last time I used it, things like seeing who liked your profile and super liking other profiles (normally you get limited number of those and they indicate that you're really interested), and seeing who viewed your profile.

One major issue is that Tinder is full of bots. The company doesn't sanitize it cuz it's in their interest to have men feel like there are more women on it than there actually are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

This has to be a joke right? Right?

[–] alienanimals 8 points 11 months ago

Fuck Tinder

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why do I remember this exact thing existing in like 2016?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

It's sad that there are people lonely enough to pay for this.

[–] Mannimarco 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's to keep those filthy poors out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›