this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
447 points (99.8% liked)

politics

20690 readers
5274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He said speaking up during the address was the best way “get across to a person who uses his incivility, who uses his incivility against our civility.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raynethackery 1 points 1 hour ago

More of this.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

Only democrat there with a spine. Hope the rest get replaced

[–] [email protected] 57 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Did Margie get ejected when she was behaving like a braying walrus? I didn't see anything suggesting that she was kicked out at the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

She is a POS indeed.

[–] BadmanDan 13 points 14 hours ago

That bitch so damn ugly dawg

[–] Suavevillain 67 points 20 hours ago

The only Dem who wasn't a coward. Either walk out with him or talk shit back to Trump instead just sitting there in pink outfits.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Here was how The New York Times put it:

In Mr. Green’s case, he was not only challenging the president but also defying the entreaties of Democratic congressional leaders that members attend Mr. Trump’s speech and refrain from disruptions. The spectacle of a septuagenarian heckling the president while waving his cane was not ideal for Democrats, who have toiled to land on a broadly appealing message and messenger for countering Mr. Trump.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 4 points 2 hours ago

Er. Where is this "broadly appealing message and messenger for countering Trump" that has been so toiled over?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago

This is exactly the kind of behavior I want to see from Democrats. A deeply unserious person like Donald Trump deserves to be heckled like the bad fucking joke he is.

[–] LePoisson 14 points 13 hours ago

These fucking Democrats are watching a dude successfully lie and bully his way into the presidency (not to mention that same playbook get adopted by the GOP in general) then think the answer is to be nice?

Newsflash, the voters on the other side aren't going to be swayed by a "broadly appealing message," I'd say an insignificant number of people could even be swayed to switch voting from the GOP / MAGA bastards over to the Dem sonofabitches anyways. So galvanized the troops, motivate people to vote and stop pussyfooting around.

Adopt the playbook that keeps working for your enemy, tweak it some sure, but stop thinking a milquetoast "we're the nice guys" campaign will ever work. It's failed so many times now, maybe learn a lesson?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah how's being broadly appealing working out?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago

Great for the fascists!

[–] foggy 46 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Is there some way we can show his office that the whole country is demanding their local constituents stand up like this?

Or our own local offices?

Call today, email, send this news story. Ask why your local rep didn't stand up. Show that we're demanding a fucking stand be made.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago

https://5calls.org/

Go off script. Add that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago
[–] Brunbrun6766 253 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (36 children)

Why didn't every Democrat step forward and PHYSICALLY bar him from being removed. They just sat there and let him be ejected. STAND THE FUCK UP

[–] [email protected] 19 points 19 hours ago

Sir, this is ~~a retirement home~~ congress. They might break a hip.

[–] argueswithidiots 139 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought the same thing. Then I thought about how powerful of a visual it would have been for each one of them, in turn, to cause a disruption and be escorted out. Let the cameras pan over a half filled chamber after 2 hours of meticulous protesting. That image would be in history books 100 years from now, assuming we all survive the next 4.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is an old fart. He's not going to stand up there for 6 hours speaking. If, one-by-one, every Democrat made a scene and got walked out they would've been there until midnight and Trump having gotten through almost none of his speech.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

they all dont want to be there, they just want to ride on the grift the gop started, and benfitting from the same donors.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But that would have put their corporate donations in jeopardy!

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 1 hour ago

Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.

  • Benito Mussolini
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

thats exactly that, with Klabauchers just staring at her phone.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Won’t someone think of the corporate donors!

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SHAREHOLDERS!?!?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

WE HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE POOR SHAREHOLDERS!

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they’re weaker than wet tissue paper.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

True, unless it comes to fighting progressives in their own party. Then they suddenly remember how to fight.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not saying I disagree with your premise.

However, there are some strange brew rules that come into play depending on the #of reps in attendance in the house. You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

I’m sure this was at top of mind for some of the folks in attendance.

[–] Brunbrun6766 8 points 18 hours ago

Congressional rules are meaningless. They are not the constitution. If the Democrats are going to just sit idle because of "congressional rules" then they might as well start using the constitution as toilet paper

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

That's why there's also quorum rules. There has to be a minimum of X% of the congresspeople present for anything to count and I'm 99.9% certain that all of the Dems leaving would bring the number present under that even if every single Republican was present.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

Quorum is largely meaningless in Congress, both houses assume they have quorum at all times. This allows for the pro forma sessions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 131 points 1 day ago

WHERE WERE THE REST OF THE DEMOCRATS? FUCKING SITTING. They didn't have the intestinal fortitude to be kindly escorted out like this old dude with a fucking cane; they walked Al out and their collective spine went with him. Johnson told them to shut up and they fucking did; they either sat there quietly with their stupid little signs, went to sleep, or walked out on their own. Fuck you, make me should be the order of the day! I've never been more ashamed of the democrats than this absolute display of submission with the slightest bit of bullying. Resistance my ass, resistance doesn't quietly walk itself out of the building!

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When it was happening I was hoping deeply that another Democrat would pick after he was removed to filibuster the SOTU. I suppose it's naive of me but for a moment I thought the democrats had organized an actual visible protest.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Apparently, they believe that sitting silently while waving tiny signs sent a stronger message.

Truly the greatest minds of our time.

EDIT: PINK! They also wore pink! I almost forgot! Just like everyone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Weirdmusic 84 points 1 day ago

Democratic Lawmaker ejected from House after DOING HIS JOB!!

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago

Thank you Al Green. At least you stood up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats cosplay resistance heroes while systemic collapse accelerates. Real opposition requires more than cane-waving, classic 2 behavior.

🐱🐱

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

they are basically like resistance grifters you see being posted on reddit.

load more comments
view more: next ›