this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
236 points (98.8% liked)

politics

20549 readers
4825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

If Democrats had some sort of plan against what's happening, they would ALL be saying this, over and over, to all journalists in every news organization and podcast.

They should lead the pushback but they look like spectators.

[–] chuckleslord 3 points 15 hours ago

... yeah, I can see it

[–] [email protected] -1 points 17 hours ago

They just plain don't care because they clearly think what's happening won't affect them.

[–] SarcasticMan 51 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Then fucking do something about it you feckless pussies. Stop with the sound bites of shit every single sane person in the United States of America already knows.

[–] jimmy90 2 points 6 hours ago

you seem like a passionate ideas man

what should they do?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 16 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

They have no power in any arm of the government which is what the Americans who bothered to vote wanted.

This is pretty much all they can do for the next two years.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago

And yet when the republicans were in the same minority situation, they have been able to block tons of major government functions, judicial appointments, and laws being passed. When the dems were in power they needed right wing compromises somehow because "otherwise the republicans would block it".

The past 40 years have literally been lesson after lesson on how to completely make the machine grind to a halt when you have an opposition party. They choose to take not one single lesson from it and not lift a single finger when it matters.

[–] Ensign_Crab 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And just like that, democrats forget that the filibuster exists. Because the filibuster is only for blocking progressive policy.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart -3 points 18 hours ago

The main thing blocking progressive policy is lack of general support.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That is false. Source: Republicans over the last fifteen years… If you were an adult when Obama was in office, you should remember this. If you’re too young, go read about it.

[–] LovingHippieCat 7 points 7 hours ago

The Republicans weren't in the minority during Obama's term except for the first 2 years when he got a shit ton done. But in 2010 they got elected to the majority in the House. They weren't a minority party except in the senate until 2014 when they managed to take it.

The reason the Republicans were able to Kneecap Obama wasn't because they were the minority party and the minority party can just do that, it was because they had power. Because the voters elected them in the midterm election with the lowest turn out in decades and that shaped the rest of his presidency.

Democrats right now don't have any power besides the Filibuster and that is definitely going to be used for legislation. But Republicans are also going to use Reconciliation to do some of their most influential legislation because that way the Democrats can't do shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They're supposed to be drumming up public opposition and resistance to Trump, in and outside of government, not just crying about it. Right now America needs them to be politicians, not legislators.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

America made them powerless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, because when they had power they did nearly nothing of value with it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

If you think Obama and Biden did nearly nothing of value I’d suggest you should pay closer attention.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Or just live outside of the US. Americans "democrats" never cared about anything but their americans bases. We're not really human to you people.

[–] AbidanYre 2 points 1 hour ago

That sounds like a problem for your own leaders to deal with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Obama is widely considered the last time the Democrats were governing for the people rather than the ultra rich (despite reneging on like half his promises), but Biden? That man failed to do the most important thing he could've done: fucking charge Trump for insurrection. And no, I'm not moving the goalposts; I just don't see value in arguing Biden's policy merits (though his biggest legacy is funding genocide in the middle east so... yeah).

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Biden did a lot of great things during his time as president.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well I don't care; Trump is now in the White House and wreaking havoc. The only thing Biden left America that isn't/won't be destroyed by god king Donald is corpses and rubble in Gaza, so whatever great things he did do (again, not accepting that statement but can't be assed to dispute it) either disappeared or will disappear in a few months.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You caring or not caring doesn’t affect Biden’s accomplishments.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 hours ago

Biden sent bombs that killed my friend in lebannon you scumbag.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you not engaging with my point? History won't care about his accomplishments.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

History already does care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The reason he will be in the history books will be leading the admin that let Trump get away.

Do you know off the top of your head, no Wikipedia, any policy of President Hindenburg other than appointing Hitler?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t even know he appointed Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point. Biden will be a footnote in history books, only famous for inflicting Trump on the world.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It’s the American voters who inflicted Trump on the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Same in Germany. I wonder why all the history books don't say "it's totally not Hindenburg's fault tho".

Biden had his role to play in the rise of Trump.

[–] TropicalDingdong 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

"Slammed"

"Pounded"

"Owned"

etc..

This is the consequence of mistaking the theater of the act for an act of theater. Appearances matter, narratives matter: but do not mistake them for the thing they represent. A flourish is necessary, but not the same as the strike itself.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 14 points 18 hours ago

The follow-up question any competent journalist should as every politician is “And therefore you will do what?”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Where's the lie though?