this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1398 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

63750 readers
4024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers jailbreak a Tesla to get free in-car feature upgrades::A group of researchers found a way to hack a Tesla's hardware with the goal of getting free in-car upgrades, such as heated rear seats.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Djennik 230 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"you wouldn't download an in-car feature"

[–] maniclucky 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd do it even if I didn't want the feature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 224 points 2 years ago (15 children)

I'm amazed that it's legal for a car company to sell you something, and then after you own it, remotely disable xyz aspects of the functionality unless you pay them more. How can that be legal? I own the car, it's MINE now, how can I not use every single thing that's in it?

[–] FlyingSquid 131 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Same reason it's legal for HP to brick your printer if you use third party ink. You violated their shitty TOS that none of us read because it's 80 pages of legalese, but you agreed to it.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago (4 children)

hmmm yes I suppose that's true. Okay so let me rephrase: I'm amazed it's legal for a car manufacturer to even HAVE a TOS like that when you purchase a car. It shouldn't be legal to write language like "you are purchasing this but agreeing that you can't use it" ... wtf?

[–] FlyingSquid 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I agree that it's wrong, but I don't think, at least in the U.S., that there's any law against it. Like I said, HP does the exact same thing with their printers. I certainly would like for it to be illegal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nioxic 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Lets be fair

TOSs you need two lawyers and an ai chatbot to explain to you, shouldnt be legal vs regular citizens.

They cannot expect anyone to read all TOS they get thrown in their face throughout a lifetime. Let alone understand them. Its often not written super clearly and not all users can even read the language very well to begin with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Cliffmode3000 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

The captalism, American politics bought and paid for.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] _number8_ 124 points 2 years ago (12 children)

good. software locks are anti human and anti consumer. everyone inherently feels ripped off by them, but the more capitalist minded think 'oh that's the company's right to do'

if it's my property in my house I can fuck with it to do whatever I want

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] captainjman2 119 points 2 years ago

Yes! Back to jailbreaking!

[–] foggy 94 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Hardware companies trying to copy the software companies with a subscription model really sucks. What's next? Intel charging a monthly fee to unlock 5 GHz boost? Nvidia charging a monthly fee if you want to do anything AI-related with their GPUs? Samsung and LG charging a monthly fee if you want to use a TV or a monitor for more than 2 hours a day? Greed knows no bounds.

[–] FireWire400 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Funnily enough, Intel tried something similar already in 2010 (way before their pay-as-you-go bullshit). It was a Pentium that you could unlock hyper-threading on for $50.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 years ago (1 children)

of course it was the PSP. I’ll say it again and again; secure computing is like adding a back door that you know about. Fuck intel me, fuck amd psp, fuck apple sep, fuck microsoft tpm, and fuck anyone who wants to have control over a device I own.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google: time to add DRM to chrome

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Iron_Lynx 72 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Can somebody build & sell a dumb electric car? Or at least one not permanently internet-enabled and/or that has no functionality and capabilities locked behind software and subscriptions?

[–] Agent641 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ive been genuinely thinking about getting into business selling dumb stuff exclusively. Dumb tvs, fridges, washers, phones, printers watever. Just a safe online vendor where you know that what you buy wont connect to the internet, need a subscription, or require a credit card on file to work. I just need a business name.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's a neat idea, and definitely a product group that I've been actively looking for. But I do find it ironic that your business model is of an online vendor that sells offline versions of online appliances haha

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A group of researchers said they have found a way to hack the hardware underpinning Tesla’s infotainment system, allowing them to get what normally would be paid upgrades — such as heated rear seats — for free.

This may also give owners the ability to enable the self-driving and navigation system in regions where it’s normally not available, the researchers told TechCrunch, though they admitted that they haven’t tested these capabilities yet, as that would require more reverse engineering.

“We are not the evil outsider, but we’re actually the insider, we own the car,” Werling told TechCrunch in an interview ahead of the conference.

Werling explained that what they did was “fiddle around” with the supply voltage of the AMD processor that runs the infotainment system.

With the same technique, the researchers said they were also able to extract the encryption key used to authenticate the car to Tesla’s network.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago

Researchers jailbreak Tesla to allow usage of the entire car they purchased. FTFY

[–] swirle13 45 points 2 years ago (7 children)

This looks to have already been discovered years ago as this company sells an OBD2 plug that can toggle all of this stuff, as well as highjacking some controls to add new functionality, as well as adding 50HP to those cars with a specific rear motor version https://ingenext.ca/products/ghost-upgrade

Is this method software only? Because the upgrades on that site are pretty expensive and proprietary.

[–] 4thDimensionDuck 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

as well as adding 50HP

Holy shit, IRL health buffs to mounts

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mydickismicrosoft 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is great. When you buy the car, you own it. I don’t care what kind of weird licenses and contracts they put together. If I buy the car and there is hardware in the car that allows for heated seats, there is no reason why I shouldn’t be able to enable it myself, tear it out, or do whatever I want with it. It is mine.

I can understand there being safety concerns for modifying a car. But the owner of the car already accepts liability for the operation of that car. If I do not modify the car and I get into an accident due to Teslas auto pilot feature or another thing baked into their system, does Tesla accept liability? No, they do not. If it is my responsibility for the safe operation of the vehicle, then it is also my responsibility to modify a vehicle in a safe manner. 

[–] _sideffect 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never buying any car with this type of tech.

If it's "our future" then I'll stick to used cars for life

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

"Researchers remove limits that shouldn't be there on features that are already part of the car"

[–] itadakimasu 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Elon's going to have a hissy fit

[–] woooferine 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

He has one every X minutes anyway, an extra one is not going to make any difference.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bisexualskunkie 23 points 2 years ago

Can't imagine a bigger "fuck you" to give to the Muskrat... other than when Xtwitter finally implodes.

[–] foggy 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"how to jailbreak your Mr coffee grinder and grind any beans you want!"

"5 hacks to get your doorbell to keep working without a subscription!"

"How to beat Microsoft Office drm to turn in assignments for free!"

"4 clever ways to keep your AC running all summer long for free, no CC required! #3 will shock you!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bappity 18 points 2 years ago

GOOD!! I despise it when hardware features are held at ransom!

load more comments
view more: next ›