this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
153 points (96.4% liked)

News

25224 readers
4803 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

That's already existed for years: https://www.eightblack.com/

They run a side-hustle of sometimes on-time airport shuttles (not armed.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

That ED-209 scene is comedic as hell.

[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'm not sure they've thought this through... If CEOs start hiring armed guards, then doesn't the next Luigi just become one? Uber-like services aren't exactly known for their stringent hiring practices.

[–] athairmor 76 points 1 day ago
[–] FlyingSquid 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This isn't for CEOs. This is for people with more money than sense who are also paranoid as fuck. CEOs can afford to hire security that they can run thorough background checks on.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luigi didn't really have a background that would have flagged him.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 1 day ago

He also didn't have a background in security.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's literally being marketed to them...

From the article:

Who is this for, you might ask? A video posted on January 6, 2025, that runs just over two minutes gives the game away. It opens with a photo of assassinated UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. “We’re going to run through a scenario to demonstrate, where if a Protector had been present, crisis could have been averted,” the Protector says in the video. He then runs through several fantasy versions of the assassination where a Protector is on hand to prevent the assassin from killing the CEO.

Also,

This is for people with more money than sense who are also paranoid as fuck.

You've just described CEOs.

[–] FlyingSquid 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it's literally being marketed to paranoid people.

Do you honestly think CEOs of major corporations would stoop to hiring their security through a non-vetted app?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. Almost no CEO would've had a security detail before now. Also, minimising costs is their lifeblood. They'll definitely be using this.

Your average paranoid Joe can't afford to hire some goons to hang around him. And the people on the board of investors don't need celebrity like CEOs do, so they're largely unknown to the public, so don't need this service.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sorry... you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives? These are people who own multiple mansions and have collections of sport cars.

And of course no CEO would have one before now. No one was suggesting otherwise. But now they do. And there are already companies out there they can hire that have vetted, experienced people who come heavily-armed and highly-trained, so why would they use this app?

[–] P00ptart 2 points 1 day ago

A lot of CEOs have had security teams for ages. Like UHC said themselves, they get death threats all the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry... you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives?

Quite literally, yes. Their commitment to being as cheap as possible is pathological. Not frugal, cheap.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand how one can have multiple mansions and luxury cars, and then we get into things like the tailored suits and the fancy dinners, and also be cheap. That fits no definition of the word 'cheap' I know.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know, it's a bit counterintuitive. But look at the Cheeto as a prime example. He's one of the biggest cheapskates around. He'll try and get out of paying for anything he possibly can. It's all slash and burn tactics with these people. It's all they know. They don't care if their bodyguards are from temu, because they're largely just for show.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 day ago

He doesn't try to get out of paying for things he wants.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

Yeah like my first thought was well the next Luigi can get paid to be given the adress to show up to.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

This service isn't for CEOs, it's for upper middle class people with recency bias.

[–] Carmakazi 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The beauty of Luigi's* escapade is that they had no fucking clue who he was until they arrested him - over a hundred miles away in fucking Pennsylvania. If he had committed to the bit and put more thought into the getaway he probably could have gotten away with it completely.

You get hired by this service, they will have all your personal info and that will get handed over to authorities immediately if you went rogue. You would be an FBI top 10 fugitive and have millions of dollars spent on bringing you in, warm or cold.

*allegedly, innocent until proven guilty, etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

All your personal info, assuming you didn't fake any of it.

How thoroughly are they going to check that stuff?

Gig economy businesses rely on disposable work force. The deal they're offering is horrible for their "employees," but because they only pay for the work that actually gets done they can afford to just hire every applicant and let them fight among themselves for a limited amount of available work.

Stringent application controls and serious background checks are anathema to that business model.

[–] ieatpwns 5 points 1 day ago

Rich don’t mean smart

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I already have a subscription with Trauma Team

[–] Mostly_Gristle 41 points 1 day ago

Systematically driving down the wages of the people you expect to catch a bullet for you by gig-ifying their industry seems like a pretty terrible idea if you're someone who depends on armed security for your continued existence.

I guess I'll go make some popcorn.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Sweet! They're giving would-be assassins the perfect way to get close to their target! 😃

[–] Allonzee 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Awesome idea for an app!

The capitalists will "efficiency" aka be greedy and pocket what they should have spent on their app's vetting process into being useless, basically opening the door to hiring potential heroes who wish to do the right thing being given the capitalist's location and being invited to show up armed.

Five stars!

[–] Carmakazi 28 points 1 day ago

Would you trust your life to be well-protected by someone you hire for $18/hour in a gig economy?

Grifters gonna grift.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Be the change you want to see in the world?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Brilliant, just the thing I need to protect me from all the disgusting poors that I've fucked over to become obscenely wealthy; gig workers with no job security!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I'm happy to volunteer as a driver!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Countdown to when they make the public pay for it again like they did when they pushed for their private security to be made into police forces.

[–] jordanlund 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure would be a shame if a bunch of normal people hired them for bachelorette parties and stuff, preventing them from responding to CEO requests.

Just sayin'... our 15th Wedding Anniversary is coming up, who wouldn't want an Escalade entourage? ;)

[–] FlyingSquid 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's who is going to be hiring them though. People who have no need for such security because they were never in any danger to begin with, but had the money to throw away on this either because they're paranoid or they want to show off.

CEOs can afford Academi.

[–] jordanlund 3 points 1 day ago

They CAN, but they are also notoriously cheap. :)

I do wonder what this service costs though.

[–] thesohoriots 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should’ve called it Goonr

[–] SpaceNoodle 2 points 1 day ago

That's a totally different service

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's more baffling to me, why the hell is it high up in the rankings on an app store? Are there that many wealthy people that have killed millions with pens? Least I thought apps were ranked by how many people use them rather than how much money they bring in). Plus you'd figure most the people in the budget to be hiring motorcades... would be better served hiring a few full time security guards.

[–] PugJesus 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus you’d figure most the people in the budget to be hiring motorcades… would be better served hiring a few full time security guards.

One thing you can never underestimate is just how cheap some of these cunts are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's how they stay rich, while the rest of us spend our measly incomes on stuff like rent and food.

[–] PugJesus 7 points 1 day ago

If that were the case, it would almost be understandable. But so many of these twats couldn't spend all their money in a single lifetime - anyone who has an 9-digit net worth (or mid-level 8-digit) could pay my monthly rent every day of their lives and, without making another cent, still die with more money than I will make in ten lifetimes.

Yet they prefer to cheat people - for example, out of a measly few hundred dollars in legally-mandated and agreed-upon overtime pay per year - to the most basic, fundamental decency.

Not even by their own professed values of well-negotiated mutual contractual obligations are they decent human beings, and that's a low fucking bar.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Their promo video is hilarious. Agent 47 over here immediately jumps behind the "protectee" as she climbs into an SUV, like six inches behind her. Even though he has backup and there is no crowd, he's handling it like a celebrity-vs-mob situation or something. He has no clue what he's doing, just what he thinks looks right for the camera.

I've worked with a real, retired bodyguard before; somebody who has had to protect people from actual, active threats in hostile environments. He was the head of security at the office I worked in, and was chill as fuck. People like that carry themselves a certain way. They move with intent and telegraph nothing. The dude I worked with was in his 60s but could still whoop my ass before I knew what hit me, he was like what I'd imagine a retired Jason Bourne to be.

These guys are like... the Paul Blart version of that. They're just doing live-fire LARPing.

[–] DharkStare 5 points 1 day ago

This is real?!? When I first heard about this, I thought it was a joke.