this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
536 points (98.4% liked)

politics

20340 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump sparked backlash after quoting Napoleon on social media: "He who saves his Country does not violate any Law."

Critics saw this as a justification for authoritarianism, comparing it to fascist rhetoric. Some mocked Trump’s legal troubles, while others suggested it signaled dictatorial ambitions.

His administration’s recent executive orders and efforts to bypass congressional approval have already raised legal concerns.

JD Vance’s claim that judges "aren't allowed to control" the executive has further fueled fears of a constitutional crisis.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 122 points 4 days ago (3 children)

He literally said he was going to be a day one dictator, multiple times, live on TV. And he still got elected.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 days ago

People have forgotten why no one wins when you have a dictator. He's kindly offered to remind them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Authoritarian culture -> Dictator fetish

[–] Placebonickname 125 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Skip to the part were we banish Trump to an island by himself and just leave him there.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Let's send him to Hans Island. Then he can "rightfully" say he laid claim to Canada and Greenland and live out his life there as a proud and noble warrior. To sweeten the deal we can send him Canadian Whiskey and Danish Schnapps to enjoy, which is great since he doesn't drink.

[–] Treczoks 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now that's a compromise many could probably live with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

As long as there’s no internet there, I’m in.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

He'd have to fight all the other great powers of the world for 23 years, so... uh... yeah. Not looking forward to that.

[–] ieatpwns 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exile that orange mother fucker. Leave him on an island and let him have his little tantrums while the world forgets about him

[–] tanisnikana 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

♪But then he’ll come back!♩

So we should banish him to another island.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

learn from history: start with the remote island. also put all the oligarchs on it and give them two guns. see how they like resource scarcity

[–] pennomi 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Islands aren’t what they used to be with modern travel. We’d need to put him on the moon instead.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

i'm fine with that. but we're keeping the limited number of guns idea. and they're both going to take different ammo so the oligarchs form up into meaningless groups based on arbitrary distinctions. see how they like it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago
[–] Tyrangle 34 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There's a simple way for the Republicans in Congress to reassure critics that this is not a dictatorship: define it. Make a list of things that would obviously not be okay. If the rest of us are right about Trump, he'll cross those lines sooner or later. Then there will be no more denying it.

[–] Blue_Morpho 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Republicans want a dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

Republicans want to be in control. If Democrats had set up a dictatorship, they would be completely against it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Like some sort of constitution

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, "He who saves the country does not violate any law." Has anybody told Luigi about this?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It just means that he wants his cronies to do as they please. If you were even raise your hands to your face you are a class A war criminal and will be shot...

God I can't believe this happened so fast. If you told me 10 years ago that it was going to be like this I'd call you crazy.

[–] Kaput 3 points 3 days ago

Plenty of people have been called crazy in the last ten years .

[–] aaa999 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)
[–] Snowclone 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The internet RIPPS OFF TRUMP'S PANTS AND PADDLES HIS BEHIND WITH A BOTTLE OF WARCHESTERSHIRE SAUSE for quoting Nepoleon who is widely considered a poor film.

[–] Treczoks 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Tha sick bastard would probably get an orgasm from that. Don't do it.

[–] Snowclone 2 points 3 days ago

Fair enough.

[–] suigenerix 2 points 4 days ago

... PADDLES HIS BEHIND...

Hey, I think you're onto something.

Trump being a dictator...

That's a paddlin

[–] notsoshaihulud 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

people commit angry typing to inflict maximum damage on the fascist-in-chief.

[–] Snowclone 4 points 4 days ago

Now this is a headline!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Whoa there, let's not make this into a sex thing.

/s...?

[–] GraniteM 7 points 3 days ago

On 1 March 1815, Napoleon and his followers landed on the French mainland at Golfe-Juan and headed for Grenoble through the foothills of the Alps, taking the route now known as Route Napoléon. The 5th Regiment intercepted him just south of Grenoble on 7 March. Napoleon approached the battalion alone and called to them, "Here I am. Kill your Emperor, if you wish!" The soldiers responded with, "Vive l'empereur!" and joined Napoleon's men. Six days later, 5,000 troops under Michel Ney, who had boasted that he would bring Napoleon to Paris in an iron cage, also joined Napoleon.

I rather doubt Trump has the kind of personal magnetism and courage that would get him to go face to face with armed troops and recruit them to his own side.

[–] DaddleDew 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He already said it plainly years ago. Can we stop pretending that we are shocked by him being a dictator already?

[–] Snowclone 4 points 4 days ago

The news will never report on the many fascist things he's plainly said for the last decade, or point out that he's already violating the constitution on a huge amount of actions. That would be mean.

[–] TomMasz 23 points 4 days ago

Uh, he already is one. He's just laying out the legal justification for it based on the SCOTUS ruling.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (5 children)

At least he's quoting Napoleon and not Hitler. Progress? No? ok, fuck Trump.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Hitler was a big Napolean fan. He visited his tomb after he conquered France.

[–] merdaverse 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not Hitler directly, but this is the same quote that Norwegian far right terrorist Breivik included in his manifesto before killing 77 people. Hitler was also a big fan of Napoleon. Similar flies buzzing around the same shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

How much slamming is one blasting?

[–] affiliate 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

the days of slamming are over. it is time to start blasting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

The Troubles: Amerikkka Edition

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyRobotShitsBolts 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I dont care what the Internet says, I want congress or the SC to say something. Who cares what I think.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 points 3 days ago

Nobody cares what they think either

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

The important difference is that Napoleon actually did some good things for France. I'd rather have him than the Orange Jackass.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I'm pretty sure he is already the head dictator of emperor musk, so therefore he is just acting as he is, not what he wants to be

[–] Emerald 3 points 3 days ago

Next stop: Quoting Machiavelli

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

And if people don't stop him, then he very well may. But ya know what happens when dictators die? Revolutions. Tales old as time.

load more comments
view more: next ›