It's about the same in terms of what it does (which means it hallucinates just as strongly and can't be trusted). It just takes less to do it. MUCH less.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
2 points (52.6% liked)
Fuck AI
1767 readers
168 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
The spirit of this community, at least as I understand it, is to not use those services nor post screenshots doing so. Because now you've wasted resources on who knows how many volunteer-run Lemmy servers with a screenshot of AI drivel.
And here I thought the sidebar said that the idea is to ridicule "AI"
Yeah, I don't get the downvotes, this is literally showing an example where the model is falling flat on its face.
I think much like the model, no one read the actual prompt and response.
And how is this post doing that exactly?
Just like me in school, the AI didn't even bother to read the full riddle, but just started giving the standard answer nevertheless.
I think it's a good example how LLMs are just smart at repeating words and dumb about problem solving.
The title introducing the AI as being better than the rest, while the content showing the shitty answer it produced.
Honestly though, after my recent interactions with some people IRL, I feel like I shouldn't be very disappointed with this.
Yeah all we got to figure out now is how to use up the water of an entire lake to figure out how to stop that wolf from eating that carrot.
Or use the electricity of a an entire household to have the same reading comprehension as a lemming.
Is there something particular about the screenshot?
OP asked the famous "Wolf, goat and cabbage problem", but altered the question.
The answer is the correct answer to the original riddle, but not the answer to the question OP asked.
It seems like both the chatbot and many readers here on lemmy didn't get the fine details in the question.
Oh wow I didn't see that. Thanks.