this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
357 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19629 readers
3491 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump ended federal security protection for Dr. Anthony Fauci, who faced threats after criticizing Trump's COVID-19 response.

Speaking to reporters in North Carolina on Friday, Trump said he wouldn’t feel any responsibility if harm befell the former government officials

The move follows similar revocations for former officials like Mike Pompeo, Brian Hook, and Bolton, who faced threats from Iran.

Fauci’s protection had been repeatedly renewed under Biden due to ongoing domestic threats.

Critics see this as another instance of Trump targeting former aides-turned-critics.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue 61 points 6 days ago

“You can’t have a security detail for the rest of your life because you worked for government,” Trump said.

I wish he had told the Secret Service that four years ago.

[–] ChowJeeBai 12 points 5 days ago

The us president, ladies and germs!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago

"Wont someone rid me of this meddlesome doctor" vibes

[–] Skyrmir 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fauci should sue him in civil court for security costs. No pardons, and lots of news coverage of a president threatening the life of an American.

[–] Nightwingdragon 25 points 6 days ago

Fauci should sue him in civil court for security costs.

Good luck getting a MAGA judge to allow a case against a sitting President to go forward. If he's lucky, he might get on the docket sometime in 2028.

No pardons, and lots of news coverage of a president threatening the life of an American.

The man literally just held a news conference to say he was stripping Fauci of his security detail and saying he's not responsible for what happens to him. He literally just put a hit out on the man. He has made virtually every news outlet bend the knee to him in some way, shape, or form already, and has made several credible threats against other outlets that don't report favorably about him. And his own base wants Fauci dead already.

I don't think he's all that worried about negative press.

[–] P00ptart 11 points 6 days ago

No, what he should really do is flee the US to the EU to tell his story. Write a book and go on tv. But never, ever come back.

[–] elbucho 35 points 6 days ago

"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?"

[–] ChowJeeBai 4 points 5 days ago

I suppose trump's genocide is on the American people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

If I said the same thing about Trump I'd get a knock on my door within 30 minutes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I won't be sad if John Bolton gets hurt...

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 6 days ago

Not only would he feel no responsibility, it'd probably give him a semi.

[–] b3an 121 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] thisorthatorwhatever 5 points 6 days ago

History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago

This is absolutely what he is doing.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

Even without this historical reference .... everyone understands what he meant.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trump is a psychopath. He feels no empathy for anybody and nothing is ever his fault.

[–] Pilferjinx 10 points 6 days ago

Trump is probably a legit narcissist. The difference is the intention and the changing inner reality to fit his narratives.

[–] ChowJeeBai 4 points 5 days ago

This is pretty much every person who sat out the election and handed him the office. Again.

'it can't be my fault because I was given a choice between a genocidal maniac and a proven insurrectionist rapist!'

[–] FenrirIII 5 points 6 days ago

He's smart enough to message to his followers what he wants while evading the blame. Like a mafia boss.

[–] RedWeasel 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only the negatives are not his fault. If it was a success he will take credit even if it was others are responsible and he did nothing or even impeded its success.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

"Fault" implies that the result is negative.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"But he's not a Nazi."

No, this is literally what the Nazis would do. Now Trump's paramilitary can take care of the rest. Exactly like the Nazis would.

There is no safety in a totalitarian regime.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Its literally what the Nazis did to people like Hans Litten. As soon as they got to power abuse that power to torture and kill the people who tried to hold them accountable.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If I worked for Trump, I'd take heed: if he can betray former collaborators, he can betray future ones too.

[–] ChowJeeBai 5 points 5 days ago

Short term thinkers don't think like that. Power and money and all that, and then they figure they can beat the orange moron.

[–] Diplomjodler3 47 points 1 week ago

He's betrayed a lot of people who worked for him. Yet the bootlickers keep coming.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing about narcissists - especially ones who want political power - is that every single one believes they are special, different, and in control.

You could put them all in an auditorium and tell them, "Look to your left, look to your right, look in front of you, look behind you. All but one of you will be betrayed and thrown in jail by Trump," and every single one would uncritically think they are the 1 in 5 that will not. They all think they can manipulate Trump and each other better than the others.

[–] Nightwingdragon 9 points 6 days ago

ou could put them all in an auditorium and tell them, “Look to your left, look to your right, look in front of you, look behind you. All ~~but one~~ of you will be betrayed and thrown in jail by Trump,”

Fixed that for you. They all think that they are the exception to the rule. They think they'll be able to jump in, make all the money, and bail out before the shit hits the fan and blows right in their face. They have the one "it" factor that everybody else has been missing.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He doesn't feel responsibility when he shits his pants, I doubt he CAN feel responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

depends. if it's a really good stinky juicy one, he might take responsibility for it with his should-be-patented smirky smile when the designated diaper changer approaches.