The best Trek is the one you like the most.
What is NOT up for debate is that the best intro song is from Enterprise.
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
25 points (66.7% liked)
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name
4057 readers
626 users here now
/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!
Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.
~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.
~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.
~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.
~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.
~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.
~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.
~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'
~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.
Fun will now commence.
Sister Communities:
Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!
Honorary Badbitch:
@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.
Creator Resources:
Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)
Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's been a long road for me to come to a point in my life where I agree with you.
The best Trek is the one you like the most
It's like the people who complain how bad SNL is these days. When it always gets summed up by SNL was best when [first started watching it in HS/College and most of the topical references were things I understood at the time]
I second that .... and if you've only ever watched a few episodes or a movie or one series and that's enough for you, then that's fine.
I love engaging with Trek fans about Trek stuff but it isn't fun when you're made to feel less for not watching or knowing everything.
The majority of Trek fans I've ever run into love any of the shows so much, they're just happy to talk about any of it.
I liked Firefly's way better:-)
Omg this is my favorite image on all of Lemmy now:-).
Early TNG is in fact PEAK Roddenberry.
I have a feeling that, of all the Treks he didn't produce, he'd have liked Lower Decks the most. It's still mostly "humans got better" future, which I think was his core tenant.
TNG was also very much
not utopian; I can't think of a word that implies that the human race evolved socially; "utopia" would imply everything was perfect for everybody. But he obviously hoped we'd be progressive.
I love DS9, but it's a step backwards socially. There's a darkness in the Federation. It's there in most of the other series, post-TNG, and maybe a little in later TNG seasons, too.
The culmination of all this is the newest series, Section 31. All of Roddenberry's ideals have simply been shit-canned. The Federation has a black ops section that's basically cold war CIA; they go around assassinating people and manipulating cultures.
I think this just reflects the zeitgeist. It's hard to be optimistic now, whereas when ST:TOS was produced we were on the moon, the cold war was fading, and mankind was reaching for the stars. TOS reflects that, and Section 31 reflects exactly how optimistic we are about the future, and current affairs.
It's depressing. And - to get back to my premise - while Lower Decks was faithful to cannon, and didn't ignore Section 31, I felt it captured the original general optimism about the future: that we'd be a better, more progressive society. And I think that would have appealed to Roddenberry.
Ahh don't you blame DS9 for kurtzmann's bullshit. Cherry picking motherfucker has warped concepts.
You literally have DS9 going "section 31 is the antithesis of everything we wish to be, we need to destroy this antiquated cancer" and kurtz is in the corner scribbling down notes on how to build the puppy mincing machine
I'm not blaming DS9! It's one of my favorites in the series. But it really didn't feel like Star Trek; it was petty dark, most of the time, with a lot of questionable ethics. It was all rationalized and the setting made absolute sense, but still... it strayed far from TOS.
not really, I mean in-universe TOS had a death penalty for going to a planet of superpowered telepaths. Women couldn't be starship captains....and lemme tell you as a woman, there are a lot of problems with TOS.
a lot.
Women couldn't be starship captains
Couldn't be? Is that cannon from TOS, or do we just have no examples of women captains? Which episode was that in? I can believe it, but it would surprise me. Uhura was a full lieutenant, which is an officer rank.
But, yeah, it was a broadcast television series produced in the 60's and a lot of that seeped through despite Roddenberry's efforts to normalize interracial relationships and minority equality.
Dude. infamously turnabout intruder.
I had always interpreted that as Starfleet not allowing captains to be married, and also that she was also genuinely unfit for command herself. But looking into it, I see that apparently Roddenberry later stated that the comments did actually refer to women not being allowed to be captains. And that he had immediately regretted adding that.
Yeah, that "if only" was a shit note to end the series on. "If only she could be content with being a second class citizen..." cheer trek, thanks for that
You hit the nail on the head.
Your username, ironically, underscores that it wasn't all optimistic progressive future. Although, I guess that was a decade later; the space race had mostly wound down, we'd been through disco and punk was peaking.
No, the missing letter did not escape my attention.
Star Trek to me will always be the story and misadventures of a post-Utopian humanity.
I'm sorry, but any of the dystopian or counter-utopian or tearing down utopia series feel not just not like Star Trek to me, but fully contrary to it.
DS9 reminds you that a utopia is construct, not a natural occurrence. And it will fall if you do not actively defend ALL of it.
The "standard" Star Trek for me by which I compare others to is TNG, because I grew up in the 80s and 90s. TOS I guess is great for getting it off the ground but I just can't relate to the 60s aesthetics, feels like I'm watching an old episode of The Munsters or I dream of Jeannie. I'm not from that time, and it feels very campy to me.
It's a thing you can't get back, a melange of culture and society and media technology and drugs. It was absolutely the best, and still is, in many ways. It was almost done in a vacuum, because the fanbase wasn't there yet (they were becoming fans) and there was no instant polling or trending media other than the basic ones they had in the 60s. The studio, even the actors, weren't getting a good picture of how huge it was.
With DS9, as an example, you get all the cool things and you also get to speculate about why this is the way it is, and what they were trying to do with that and if they thought the other was going to make the show a certain way or not, etc. . . . With TOS you get what you get. Star Trek, original, home made, artisinal episodes with 100% pure Shat and a Spock/McCoy overtone blend on a shoestring with everyone but the fans laughing at or ignoring them. Watching it now and kind of going back to the future is big fun if you can get to it. I totally understand if people can't, but don't dismiss it - it's the only one you actually need to grok to love Star Trek.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Wasn’t Gene involved in the early seasons of TNG?
Not only that, he said that it more closely captured his vision.
That's what I was thinking too.
I'm pretty sure he's credited as [executive] producer or something
Remember when it was just Enterprise
No bloody A, B, C, or D.
You could tell the speed we were traveling by the feel of the deck plates.
Forgot The Orville.
TNG fanfic
Hi-ooooooooo
All versions of Star Trek have their high and low points. The debate should be which ones managed to do that enough times. Because that's more of a subjective measure people are going to differ on what they like, so we get the disagreement of what's "best" or "real". In the end they all are tied to the Star Trek universe and concepts, just aren't the same in how they present and tell the stories. I don't like Discovery for a number of reasons, but I have seen a few parts where it felt TOS/TNG Star Trek level for a bit.
And I know this is just visual media, but I'm a rarity who likes the alternate future of the Star Fleet Battles board game that was based on TOS ships and history but expanded much differently ways. TNG and later loosely used some of the ideas in their various plots. The Borg are absolutely a variant of the Andromedans, sans a cube ship.
The mental disorder of Lower Decks is ADHD.
Prodigy isn't a mental disorder. It's just not yet fully grown.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I started trying to place them on a triangle with the three corners labelled "good trek", "bad trek", and "not trek" but I soon ended up arguing against my own choices of where I'd put them.
Not to mention that gatekeeping is kinda gross and actively goes against what Star Trek stands for. You wanna label good trek or bad trek, fine. But not trek? Come on.
I think on the mindset of what trek stands, bringing humanity together & tearing down divisions is really at the core. I think it's completely fine to dissociate with elements of the media that seem to go contrary to that when you want to engage with something that pushes the idea of a positive future.
load more comments
(17 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Where do the Star Trek Christmas Specials fit in?
I'm by no means a Trekkie as much as I am a Gater, but didn't TNG get immensely better after Roddenberry stopped being able to give input and make weird episodes?
It definitely became something... different after season 1 when he stopped contributing
view more: next ›